Abstract
I argue in favor of associating situations (events, episodes, eventualities, etc.) with arbitrarily complex sentences, not just atomic predicates, in NL interpretation. In that respect, a Situation Semantics approach to incorporating situations into semantic representations is preferable to a Davidsonian one. However, I will further argue that beyond the notion of truth or falsity of a sentence in a situation, as in Situation Semantics, we also need the notion of a sentence characterizing a situation, in order to deal adequately with causal relations mentioned or implied in NL texts. I propose a way of doing this that essentially reduces complex situations to joins of basic, Davidsonian ones, along with basic situations corresponding to negated predications. The resulting situational logic, called FOL**, captures many of the essential features of both Davidsonian and Situation Semantics approaches to representing the content of sentences describing situations. The proposed semantics supports common intuitions about truth-in-situations, about the existence of situations characterized by sentences, and about persistence of information from parts of situations to the whole. I allow for temporal parts of situations as well as concurrent parts, and distinguish persistence properties of telic and atelic sentences. The development of FOL** is part of a continuing effort to fully formalize Episodic Logic, an implemented knowledge representation designed to support language understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. F. and Schubert, L. K. (1993). Language and discourse in the trains project. In Ortony, A., Slack, J., and Stock, O., editors, Communication from an Artificial Intelligence Perspective, pages 91–120. Theoretical Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.
Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J. (1995). The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Davidson, D. (1967a). Causal relations. The J. of Philosophy, 64:691–703. Reprinted in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, editors, The Logic of Grammar, pp. 246–254. Dickenson Publ., Encino, CA., 1975.
Davidson, D. (1967b). The logical form of action sentences. In Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, editors, The Logic of Grammar, pp. 235–245. Dickenson Publ., Encino, CA., 1975. (Reprinted from The Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher, ed., U. of Pittsburg Pr., 1967.).
Hobbs, J. R. (1985). Ontological promiscuity. In 23rd Ann. Meet, of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (COLING-85), pages 61–69, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Hobbs, J. R., Croft, W., Davies, T., Edwards, D., and Laws, K. (1986). Commonsense metaphysics and lexical semantics. In 24th Ann. Meet, of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (COLING-86), pages 231–240, Columbia Univ., New York, NY.
Hwang, C. H. and Schubert, L. K. (1993a). Episodic Logic: A comprehensive, natural representation for language understanding. Minds and Machines, 3(4):381–419.
Hwang, C. H. and Schubert, L. K. (1993b). Episodic Logic: A situational logic for natural language processing. In Peter Aczel, David Israel, Y. K. and Peters, S., editors, Situation Theory and its Applications, volume 3, pages 303–338, Stanford, CA. CSLI.
Hwang, C. H. and Schubert, L. K. (1994). Interpreting tense, aspect and time adverbials: A compositional, unified approach. In Gabbay, D. M. and Ohlbach, H. J., editors, Proc., 1st Int’l. Conf. on Temporal Logic, pages 238–264, Bonn, Germany. Springer-Verlag.
McCarthy, J. and Hayes, P. J. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In Meltzer, B. and Michie, D., editors, Machine Intelligence 4, pages 463–502. Edinburgh University Press.
Moore, R. C. (1989). Events, situations, and adverbs. In Martins, J. and Morgado, E., editors, Proc. of the 4th Portugese Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Berlin. Springer-Verlag. Reprinted in R.C. Moore, Logic and Representation, (ch. 9), pages 159–170, CSLI Lecture Notes No. 39, CSLI Publications, 1995.
Muskens, R. (1995). Meaning and Partiality. CSLI Books, Stanford, CA.
Namioka, A., Hwang, C. H., and Schaeffer, S. (1992). Using the inference tool epilog for a message processing application. Int’l. J. of Expert Systems, 5(l):55–82.
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantic of English. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, New York, NY.
Schubert, L. K. and Hwang, C. H. (1989). An episodic knowledge representation for narrative texts. In Proc., 1st Int’l. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR′89), pages 444–458, Toronto, Canada.
Schubert, L. K. and Hwang, C. H. (2000). Episodic Logic meets Little Red Riding Hood: A comprehensive, natural representation for language understanding. In Iwanska, L. and Shapiro, S. C, editors, Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language, pages 111–174. MIT/AAAI Press.
Traum, D., Schubert, L., Poesio, M., Martin, N., Light, M., Hwang, C. H., Heeman, P., Ferguson, G., and Allen, J. (1996). Knowledge representation in the trains-93 conversation system. Int. J. of Expert Sys., special issue on Knowledge Representation and Inference for Natural Language Processing, 9(l):173–223.
Wilensky, R. (1991). Sentences, situations, and propositions. In Sowa, J. F., editor, Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge, pages 191–227 (ch. 6). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schubert, L.K. (2000). The Situations We Talk About. In: Minker, J. (eds) Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 597. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1567-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1567-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5618-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1567-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive