Skip to main content

Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Regularized Artificial Neural Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Estimating Nonlinear Models

Abstract

The artificial neural network (ANN) test of Lee et al. (Journal of Econometrics 56, 269–290, 1993) uses the ability of the ANN activation functions in the hidden layer to detect neglected functional misspecification. As the estimation of the ANN model is often quite difficult, LWG suggested activate the ANN hidden units based on randomly drawn activation parameters. To be robust to the random activations, a large number of activations is desirable. This leads to a situation for which regularization of the dimensionality is needed by techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA), Lasso, Pretest, partial least squares (PLS), among others. However, some regularization methods can lead to selection bias in testing if the dimensionality reduction is conducted by supervising the relationship between the ANN hidden layer activations of inputs and the output variable. This paper demonstrates that while these supervised regularization methods such as Lasso, Pretest, PLS, may be useful for forecasting, they may not be used for testing because the supervised regularization would create the post-sample inference or post-selection inference (PoSI) problem. Our Monte Carlo simulation shows that the PoSI problem is especially severe with PLS and Pretest while it seems relatively mild or even negligible with Lasso. This paper also demonstrates that the use of unsupervised regularization does not lead to the PoSI problem. Lee et al. (Journal of Econometrics 56, 269–290, 1993) suggested a regularization by principal components, which is a unsupervised regularization. While the supervised regularizations may be useful in forecasting, regularization should not be supervised in inference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For radial basis functions, see (e.g.) Campbell, Lo and Mackinlay (1997, p. 517).

  2. 2.

    See Pötscher and Leeb (2009) and Berk, Brown, Buja, Zhang and Zhao (2011).

  3. 3.

    At 5% level, since the p-value is Bernoulli distributed with success probability of 0.05, the standard error of the p-value from the 1,000 Monte Carlo replication is \(\sqrt{\left (0.05 \times 0.95 \right ) /1000} \approx 0.0069\). The 95% confidence interval is 0.05 ± 1.96 × 0.0069 = (0.0365, 0.0635). At 10% level, the standard error of the p-value is \(\sqrt{\left (0.1 \times 0.9 \right ) /1000} = 0.0095\), and the 95 % confidence interval is 0.10 ± 1.96 × 0.0095 = (0.0814, 0.1186).

References

  • Aït-Sahalia, Y., P. J. Bickel and T. M. Stoker (2001), “Goodness-of-fit Tests for Kernel Regression with an Application to Option Implied Volatilities,” Journal of Econometrics 105(2), 363–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. W. K. (1991), “Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation,” Econometrica 59(3), 817–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. W. K. and W. Ploberger (1994), “Optimal Tests when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Econometrica 62, 1383–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2008), “Forecasting Economic Time Series Using Targeted Predictors”, Journal of Econometrics 146, 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, E., Hastie, T., Paul, D. and Tibshirani, R. (2006), “Prediction by Supervised Principal Components,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101(473), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R., L. Brown, A. Buja, K. Zhang and L. Zhao (2011), “Valid Post-Selection Inference,” The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper. Submitted to the Annals of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierens, H. J. (1982), “Consistent Model Specification Tests,” Journal of Ecomometrics 20, 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierens, H. J. (1990), “A Consistent Conditional Moment Test of Functional Form,” Econometrica 58, 1443–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierens, H. J. and W. Ploberger (1997), “Asymptotic Theory of Integrated Conditional Moment Tests,” Econometrica 65, 1129–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, A. P. and G. Kapetanios (2000), “A Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network Test for ARCH,” Economics Letters 69, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, A. P. and G. Kapetanios (2003), “A Radial Based Function Artificial Neural Network Test for Neglected Nonlinearity,” Econometrics Journal 6, 356–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, E., H., Trevor j. Iain and T., Robert (2004), Annals of Statistics 32(2), 407–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. and R. McClelland (1996), “A Kernel Test for Neglected Nonlinearity,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 1(2), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Z., J. Fan and Q. Yao (2000), “Functional-Coefficient Regression Models for Nonlinear Time Series,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95(451), 941–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., A. W. Lo and A. C. Mackinlay (1997), The Economometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, V. and N. R. Swanson (2002), “A Consistent Test for Nonlinear Out of Sample Predictive Accuracy,” Journal of Econometrics 110, 353–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, C. M. (2002), “An Investigation of Tests for Linearity and the Accuracy of Likelihood Based Inference using Random Fields,” Econometrics Journal 1, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, C. M. and G. Gonzalez-Rivera (2003), “Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity in Regression Models: A Collection of New Tests,” Journal of Econometrics 114(1), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. B. (1977), “Hypothesis Testing when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Biometrika 64, 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. B. (1987), “Hypothesis Testing when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Biometrika 74, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubank, R. L. and C. H. Spiegelman (1990), “Testing the Goodness of Fit of a Linear Model Via Nonparametric Regression Techniques,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85(410), 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y. and Q, Li (1996), “Consistent Model Specification Tests: Omitted Variables and Semi-parametric Functional Forms,” Econometrica 64, 865–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. and J, Lv (2008), “Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 70, 849–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. and R. Li (2001), “Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1348–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, I.E., and J.H. Friedman (1993), “A Statistical View of Some Chemometrics Regression Tools,” Technometrics, 35, 109–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. and T. Teräsvirta (1993), Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships, Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (2001), “A Parametric Approach to Flexible Nonlinear Inference,” Econometrica 69(3): 537–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1996), “Inference When a Nuisance Parameter Is Not Identified Under the Null Hypothesis,” Ecomometrica 64: 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W. and E. Mammen (1993), “Comparing Nonparametric versus Parametric Regression Fits,” Annals of Statistics 21: 1926–1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, E., H. Huang, T.-H. Lee, and Canlin Li (2011), “Using the Yield Curve in Forecasting Output Growth and Inflation”, Manuscript. Aarhus University and UC Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjellvik, V. and D. Tjøstheim (1995), “Nonparametric Tests of Linearity for Time Series,” Biometrika 82(2), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjellvik, V. and D. Tjøstheim (1996), “Nonparametric Statistics for Testing of Linearity and Serial Independence,” Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 6, 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjellvik, V., Q. Yao and D. Tjøstheim (1998), “Linearity Testing Using Local Polynomial Approximation,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 68, 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y. and H. White (1995), “Consistent Specification Testing via Nonparametric Series Regression,” Econometrica 63, 1133–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K.D. (2012), “The Role of Hypothesis Testing in the Molding of Econometric Models,” Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE) Working Paper No. 2012–03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, and H. White (1989), “Multi-Layer Feedforward Networks Are Universal Approximators,” Neural Network 2, 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., J. Horowitz and Ma, S. (2008), “Asymptotic Properties of Bridge Estimators in Sparse High-dimensional Regression Models,” Annals of Statistics 36, 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. and T.-H. Lee (2010), “To Combine Forecasts or To Combine Information?” Econometric Reviews 29, 534–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, A. and Kilian, L. (2008), “How Useful is Bagging in Forecasting Economic Time Series? A Case Study of U.S. CPI Inflation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(482), 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, A. B. (2011), “Forecasting with Universal Approximators and a Learning Algorithm,”Journal of Time Series Econometrics 3, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, A. B. and T. Teräsvirta (2011), “Forecasting Macroeconomic Variables using Neural Network Models and Three Automated Model Selection Techniques,” CREATES Research Paper 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H. (2001), “Neural Network Test and Nonparametric Kernel Test for Neglected Nonlinearity in Regression Models,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 4(4), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H. and A. Ullah (2001), “Nonparametric Bootstrap Tests for Neglected Nonlinearity in Time Series Regression Models,” Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 13, 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H. and A. Ullah (2003), “Nonparametric Bootstrap Specification Testing in Econometric Model,” Computer-Aided Econometrics, Chapter 15, edited by David Giles, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 451–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H., H. White and C. W. J. Granger (1993), “Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity in Time Series Models: A Comparison of Neural Network Methods and Alternative Tests,” Journal of Econometrics 56, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H., Z. Xi and R. Zhang (2012), “Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Artificial Neural Networks with Many Random Hidden Unit Activations,” UCR, manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeb, H. and B.M. Pötscher (2003), “The finite-sample distribution of post model-selection estimators and uniform versus nonuniform approximations,” Econometric Theory 19, 100–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeb, H. and B.M. Pötscher (2005), “Model selection and inference: Facts and fiction,” Econometric Theory 21, 21–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeb, H. and B.M. Pötscher (2006), “Performance limits for estimators of the risk or distribution of shrinkage-type estimators, and some general lower risk-bound results,” Econometric Theory 22, 21–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeb, H. and B.M. Pötscher (2008), “Can One Estimate The Unconditional Distribution Of Post-Model-Selection Estimators?,” Econometric Theory 24(2), 338–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. and S. Wang (1998), “A Simple Consistent Bootstrap Test for a Parametric Regression Function,” Journal of Econometrics 87, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. Y. (1988), “Bootstrap Procedures under Some Non-iid Models,” Annals of Statistics 16: 1697–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, Y. (1999), “A Test of Linearity Against Functional-Coefficient Autoregressive Models,” Communications in Statistics, Theory and Method 28(11), 2539–2551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. K. (1985), “Maximum Likelihood Specification Testing and Conditional Moment Tests,” Econometrica 53, 1047–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi, J. M. and B. Portier (1997), “A Test of Linearity for Functional Autoregressive Models,” Journal of Time Series Analysis 18(6), 615–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pötscher, B.M. and H. Leeb, (2009), “On the Distribution of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimators: The LASSO, SCAD, and Thresholding,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100(9), 2065–2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengos, T. and Y. Sun (2001), “Consistent Model Specification Test for a Regression Function Based on Nonparametric Wavelet Estimation,” Econometric Reviews 20(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, M. and H. White (1998), “Consistent Specification Testing with Nuisance Parameters Present only under the Alternative,” Econometric Theory 14, 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauchen, G. (1985), “Diagnostic Testing and Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Models,” Journal of Econometrics 30, 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. (1996), “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B, 58, 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. (1996), “Power Properties of Linearity Tests for Time Series,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 1(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, Timo, C.-F. Lin and C. W. J. Granger (1993), “Power of the Neural Network Linearity Test,” Journal of Time Series Analysis 14(2), 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjøstheim, D. (1999), “Nonparametric Specification Procedures for Time Series,” in S. Ghosh (ed.), Asymptotics, Nonparametrics, and Time Series: A Tribute to M.L. Puri, Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, A. (1985), “Specification Analysis of Econometric Models,” Journal of Quantitative Economics 1: 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whang, Y.-J. (2000), “Consistent Bootstrap Tests of Parametric Regression Functions,” Journal of Econometrics 98, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980), “A Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1987), “Specification Testing in Dynamic Models,” T.F. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Fifth World Congress, Vol 1, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1989), “An Additional Hidden Unit Tests for Neglected Nonlinearity in Multilayer Feedforward Networks,” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, DC. (IEEE Press, New York, NY), II: 451–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1994), Estimation, Inference, and Specification Analysis, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (2006), “Approximate Nonlinear Forecasting Methods,” Handbook of Economic Forecasting 1, 459–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. F. J. (1986), “Jackknife, Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Methods in Regression Analysis,” Annals of Statistics 14: 1261–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, J. X. (1996), “A Consistent Test of Functional Form via Nonparametric Estimation Techniques,” Journal of Econometrics 75, 263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H. (2006), “The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101(476), 1418–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H. and H. Zhang (2009), “On The Adaptive Elastic-Net with a Diverging Number of Parameters, ” The Annals of Statistics 37(4), 1773–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Hwy Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, TH., Xi, Z., Zhang, R. (2014). Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Regularized Artificial Neural Networks. In: Ma, J., Wohar, M. (eds) Recent Advances in Estimating Nonlinear Models. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8060-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics