File:Fermentation Technologies (AD) based on Biomass (Substrates) - Matrix.png
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 570 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 228 pixels | 640 × 456 pixels | 1,024 × 730 pixels | 1,280 × 912 pixels | 2,560 × 1,825 pixels | 3,579 × 2,551 pixels.
Original file (3,579 × 2,551 pixels, file size: 3.4 MB, MIME type: image/png)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionFermentation Technologies (AD) based on Biomass (Substrates) - Matrix.png |
English: The provided infographic is a visual representation of the potential for gas production from various types of biomass through anaerobic digestion (AD) technology. It includes a gradient scale indicating the gas potential /vs. dry matter (DM%) of different materials, ranging from over 0% to 55%. The materials are depicted with corresponding images and include feed and food grain, food waste, various kinds of manure (cattle, poultry, horse), green waste, and straw. The infographic categorizes biomass into easily degradable, liquid biomasses like liquid manure and tougher, fibrous biomasses like straw, each suited for different fermentation technologies - liquid, plug flow, and dry fermentation. This educational image is designed to inform viewers about the efficiency of different substrates in biogas production processes, highlighting the dry matter content and gas potential of each biomass type.
Deutsch: Die bereitgestellte Infografik ist eine visuelle Darstellung des Potenzials für die Gaserzeugung aus verschiedenen Arten von Biomasse durch anaerobe Vergärungstechnologie (AD). Sie enthält eine Skala, die das Gaspotenzial im Verhältnis zur Trockensubstanz (TS) der verschiedenen Materialien anzeigt und von über 0 % bis 55 % reicht. Die Materialien sind mit entsprechenden Bildern dargestellt und umfassen Futter- und Lebensmittelgetreide, Lebensmittelabfälle, verschiedene Arten von Mist (Rinder, Geflügel, Pferde), Grünabfälle und Stroh. Die Infografik unterteilt die Biomasse in leicht abbaubare, flüssige Biomassen wie Gülle und zähere, faserige Biomassen wie Stroh, die sich jeweils für unterschiedliche Fermentationsverfahren eignen - Flüssig-, Pfropfenstrom- und Trockenfermentation. Dieses informative Bild soll den Betrachter über die Effizienz der verschiedenen Substrate in Biogasproduktionsprozessen informieren und den Trockensubstanzgehalt und das Gaspotenzial jeder Biomasseart hervorheben. |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Thzorro77 |
Licensing
[edit]I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:20, 23 February 2024 | 3,579 × 2,551 (3.4 MB) | Thzorro77 (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on gl.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Software used |
---|