Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Rathaus Hannover, Innenansicht.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2016 at 01:06:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Rathaus Hannover, Innenansicht.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Rathaus Hannover, Innenansicht.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created and uploaded by Raycer - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support For me, it's the best interior view I've ever seen. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - I don't like it quite as much as you, as there are some unsharp areas around the edges at full size, but I do like both the photo and the motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Noise in shadow --The Photographer (talk) 11:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose A lot of noise in the dark areas and it is out of balance, something is weird here, and that bright spot at the top, keep bringing my eyes removing the attention to the door, "it's the best interior view I've ever seen" o.O, search for Diliff. -- RTA 12:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigo.Argenton: View, including angle. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support nice photo -- Jiel (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I do like this one a lot. Fully agree with the nominator. -- Ram-Man 23:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support INeverCry 02:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A little luminance noise never hurt anybody. Better than too much denoising! -- Thennicke (talk) 05:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Compared to our other interior FPs, this is very noisy and over-sharpened (making the noise worse). Sorry, but I think if I nominated this as my own, it would be torn to shreds by my friends, never mind my enemies :-). Clearly a subject worth photographing. -- Colin (talk) 12:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Its noisy, best of it, it has QI mark, where this would be main issue. Suppose Ccefalon was on break. I could not see EXIF to be more straight, hand shot or not...etc. Colors are fine. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I think it has great wow when I see it in its entirety on my screen. If I look at full resolution, sure there is some luminance noise in the darker area, but it is also a 22 MPixel photo, which should be taken into account, it is not a downsampled 'thumbnail'. If we complain about this level of noise at this detail level it will motivate nominators to just downsample instead. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Noise, worse at edges, per other opposers. Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]