Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azogues Ecuador Igl San Francisco 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2016 at 22:35:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Azogues Ecuador Igl San Francisco 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azogues Ecuador Igl San Francisco 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created and uploaded by Cayambe - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Do they have enough of those little black lights stuck everywhere? INeverCry 22:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral Fix the verticals please --The Photographer (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral per The Photographer. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Just a QI. At only 4.8MP and not sharp (plus the vertical perspective issue) this is not close to being among our finest works. -- Colin (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral New version uploaded, verticals corrected on both sides, noise reduction... BUT I tend to agree with Colin. --Cayambe (talk) 17:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral per The Photographer. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Moderate  Oppose - I realize this is pretty punctilious criticism, but I feel it's a bit too unsharp for me, especially at the altar. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think it over-"punctilious" to expect pixel-level sharpness for 4.8MP. Pixel-peeping a 48MP image, on the other hand... -- Colin (talk) 08:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose as per Colin, at this Size this would need to be pin-sharp to be considered. I tried to salvage it with deblurring, but it does not give me the wow that I expect from this type of interior. --Rftblr (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]