User talk:RedAuburn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RedAuburn!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. GPSLeo (talk) 11:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiff files

Hi, Do you understand, how we use tiff files on the project. We don't crop them, rather convert and crop. Please see this image for an explanation. Any questions, happy to help? jpeg files are used on websites, because they scale better. Broichmore (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can get (direct from this museum's website) jpeg equivalents of these very large tiff files. Just saying. Broichmore (talk) 20:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hiǃ
I agree that TIFFs aren't an ideal format, but I'm not the original uploader. I was under the impression from Commons:Media_for_cleanup#Unnecessary_borders that it's fine to overwrite files with crops that remove colour patches & borders which are not part of the image, are TIFFs exempt from this?
The JPEG equivalents on the website are a good point though, maybe we can replace the current imported TIFFs with them? RedAuburn (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fae, uploaded the files in the first place in collaboration with the museum. They are not available on their website, special access is required. There's no rule as such, that they can’t be cropped, but of course cropping is a filter, and all filters diminish, as well as potentially introduce corruption.
Tiff files, and some say png's too, are reference files, for conversion to jpg (use GIMP or photoshop). So why alter them in the first place.
Yes, I agree, jpg's are preferred for general use, for multiple reasons, most importantly size without loss of definition, and as I said they scale better. Broichmore (talk) 21:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noticed there were reversions here, This is because the original reference files contain colour indices, so you can check the art is properly rendered on any derivatives. Well, that's my take on it. Broichmore (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the same name as another file, which already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya,
thanks for reverting the crops.
As discussed above, Commons:Media for cleanup#Unnecessary borders suggested that these types of crops would be uncontroversial (In fact, I even mentioned that I wanted to do this clean-up as part of my request for autopatrol permissions)
I'll make sure to upload crops as a separate file in the future 👍️ RedAuburn (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broughton Village, Scottish Borders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swanage War Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]