User talk:Gzen92

Archives 2005.
Archives 2013-2015.
Archives 2016-2017.
Archives 2018-2019.
Archives 2020-2021.
Archives 2022-2023.
Archives valued images.
Archives quality images.
Archives featured pictures.

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

✴ Happy Holidays, Gzen92 ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Gzen92, va donc regarder les catégories May 2023 in Colmar et June 2023 in Colmar, tu vas halluciner, mon vieux ! PLus de 600 nouvelles photos en tout, et toutes de la meilleure qualité ! Tu vas pouvoir t'amuser à catégoriser tout cela, mais ce sera sûrement un plaisir ! :) Bien à toi, Edelseider (talk) 18:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beau boulot, Gzen92 ! Tu assures ! Mais ça en vaut la peine ! Si en tu as le temps, il reste les photos de la Category:Koïfhus à catégoriser. Pour ma part, je m'occupe — peu à peu — des collections du musée d'Unterlinden. Il y a encore à faire de ce côté-là ! Cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Edelseider: j'ai vu que tu t'occupais du musée Unterlinden, c'est bien car il y a aussi beaucoup à faire et je manque de temps. Prochainement, je pense harmoniser Buildings in Colmar by street : à part les bâtiments célèbres, je vais normaliser en "Building at X, rue xxx (Colmar)". Cordialement, Gzen92 (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Gzen92, j'ai vu que ton bot renomme des tas de catégories colmariennes. Sur la forme, cela paraît judicieux, mais sur le fond, c'est problématique. Pourquoi ? Parce que tu renommes systématiquement building des catégories qui étaient soit "immeuble", soit "maison", soit "villa". En fait, tu effaces la distinction entre ces trois types de bâtiment, qui est pourtant essentielle. En gros : immeuble = grand, maison = petit, villa = riche (et privé). J'aurais à ta place transformé "maison" en house, laissé "villa" tel quel, et "immeuble", eh bien, j'en aurais fait building. N'ai-je pas raison ? Cordialement, Edelseider (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir @Edelseider: effectivement. Merci à toi pour le renommage des villas, il n'y en avait pas d'autres (à voir pour Maison des jeunes et de la culture / villa Wiederkehr. Pour les maison et immeuble, j'en ai moi-même crés bon nombre, si ce n'est la majorité et je pense que l'appellation était la plupart du temps erronées, c'est pourquoi j'ai préféré utiliser le terme générique "building", que l'on pourra toujours affiner au cas par cas en "house" (à noter que j'ai conservé les appellations historiques (maison Bergheaud, maison Kern, maison Pfister) même s'il s'agit pour la plupart actuellement de logement collectif.

Concernant mes modifications, j'ai conservés les nom avant/après modification, je peux sans soucis faire marche sur une série de nom. Cordialement, Gzen92 (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've marked a building in File:F Haut-Rhin Colmar 07.jpg now. What ist this, not the Maison Pfister? PaulT (talk) 20:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulT: that's right. It's a distant view with lots of buildings. The category Category:Maison Pfister (Colmar) is very busy. Putting a note is enough I think, here we could possibly indicate "remote view of Maison Pfister". Gzen92 (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok --PaulT (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gzen92, Centaurea triumfettii is a species of the southern Alps and it does not occur in the Bas-Rhin area. If this is a wildflower, then this is certainly Centaurea montana. If it is a cultivated flower (which is likely outside the Vosges mountains), then it is still very likely Centaurea montana, which is a frequently cultivated species. The major difference is the color of the appendages of the involucral bracts, see e.g. [1]. Leaves are also different, but I am not sure from your image. I do not know how you identified the species, but it is wise to also take a photo with a side view when you take photos of knapweeds because this makes identification much easier. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 07:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Robert Flogaus-Faust: identification with plantnet.org, Centaurea triumfettii 28 %, Centaurea montana 18.9 %. You are better than AI, I modify. Gzen92 (talk) 08:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Gzen92, j'espère que tu vas bien ! Réjouis-toi : de nouvelles photos de Colmar sont arrivées et tu peux les dorloter à loisir. Tu les trouveras dans la catégorie June 2023 in Colmar, leur nom commence toujours par "Colmar June 2023". Amuse-toi bien, et merci ! Edelseider (talk) 17:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Et on continue, cher Gzen92 : voici 32 nouvelles photos de Colmar, prises le mois dernier. Voir Category:July 2024 in Colmar. Amicalement, --Edelseider (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, @Gzen92: ǃ Je ne sais pas comment faire une demande à votre bot, peux-je l'écrire ici? Je voulais savoir si votre bot peut faire upload d'une collection portugaise de monnaies anciennes dans le site Museu da Casa da Moeda. Est-il possible? Quelle que soit la réponse, merci beaucoup d'avanceǃ Cordialement, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Mhmrodrigues: je suis d'autre versements (Gallica). Tu peux regarder ici (en bas, "File upload" ou "User assistants"). Cordialement Gzen92 (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, @Gzen92: ǃ Merci pour ta réponse! Oui, je comprends que vous serez plus intéressé de faire upload de images/objets des musées françaises que d'autres pays. La colléction française est indubitablement riche, et merci pour me montrer ça avec les uploads de votre bot! Merci aussi pour ton conseil; je regarderai les liens. Pardon moi quelques erreurs, J'apprend encore le français. Cordialement, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 08:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gzen92,

sorry for interfering with your last nomination. I did not want to annoy you, my comments were just about the idea of a speedy renomination which has recently triggered several heated discussions (as mentioned by Basile) and caused a lot of trouble. Therefore I wanted to intervene quickly, before several users vote on the nomination and then are frustrated when somebody starts again to discuss the renomination problem ...

As a sign of goodwill, I would be happy to help you with the improvement of the photo, if you want, in a similar way as with your Château du Saint-Ulrich photo. I cannot guarantee success, but I see some possibilities for careful improvements of your beautiful Fontainebleau photo. Would you be interested? Then I could try what I can come up with, just as a little help and as a compensation for the trouble with this nomination. However in my experience it is better when I start with the original image file, directly as produced by the camera, to avoid any loss of quality caused by the repetitive edits. So if you are interested, just upload the original, unedited image file somewhere and I will see what I can do with it. Of course this is just an offer, you do not need to use my version if you are not satisfied with it!

In any case, no offence and all the best to you, Roman / – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aristeas: no problem, your comments were right. I accept your help with pleasure. I have difficulty with the colors/contrast of the photos. I only have jpg, see 27 août 2024 à 14:01. Thanks for your help, there is no emergency. Sincerly, Gzen92 (talk) 08:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gzen92, thank you for your answer and your interest. Ah, very well, it’s good to know that the 27 août 2024 à 14:01 version is the original, so I will start with that version. If it is OK for you, I would like to wait until next week with this as I am busy with some other duties over the weekend. I will contact you when I have a first proposal for an edited version. All the best and have a nice weekend, too – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aristeas: I always upload the original first, it can be useful. Take your time, I'm in no hurry. Thanks again. Gzen92 (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have reverted your revision before figuring out completely what you had done. Still I suppose your method is not quite correct. I added the category Clothing shops in France to this picture because this shop is currently located in this house and could be seen at the picture. You moved this category to the category created for this building. However, this building is many centuries old, and most of the time it had not a clothing shop in it (an it is quite possible that in 5 or 20 years will not have it anymore when the space on the ground floor would be rented by somebody else). So, if any picture of the same building created before or after the clothing shop in it will be added to Commons and obviously end up in the category of this building, it should not be included into the category for clothing shops. Thus this category has to be located in the page of the pictures itself, as any category for temporary, not permanent qualities of this building. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Андрей Романенко: I understand, what you say is right. I actually did that for this city. Gzen92 (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Le bouc, texte de Rainer Werner Fassbinder - photographies - Alain Fonteray - btv1b10611364c (181 of 343).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Didym (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]