User talk:Marcus Cyron: Difference between revisions

This user is a member of the Volunteer Response Team. (verify)

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Mein Herr, Sie sehr viel! --Ejensyd (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I will leave File:Flag_of_Iraq_(1963-1991);_Flag_of_Syria_(1963-1972).svg.svg cleanup to you. It is my opinion that the rename of flags like this one is not a good idea. They are a PITA due to how the templates are used at the WPs plus while they look the same I think that separate naming is a better way to manage these issues, especially with like flags that have different derivation.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you try to say to me. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving File:Le opere di Galileo Galilei XV.djvu to itas new name. At beginning I've been confused from the existence of a redirect: I didn't know that it was possible! Is it something new? Or did I simply ignore this possibility? --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 13:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed all references to File:Le opere di Galileo Galilei XV.djvu, pointing them into File:Opere complete di Galileo Galilei XV.djvu; can you delete the redirect page? It could be confusing into itsource. Thanks!--Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 19:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be a new evention, as far as I remeber, redirects were earlier than moving. And the redirects always comes automatic, when you move an image that's used. Deletion is ofcourse possible. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antique body board.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I greatly appreciate the moves you have completed on all the sword photos. As there are some that are almost identical, I will only request moves for one example of each general view of this sword. Wpollard (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, this sword has files with photos that are either identical or almost identical views of this sword. If I knew how to nominate the duplicates for deletion, I would do so. I probably would get some very negative comments, but we are trying to make the Wikimedia system better, not waste space with almost identical images. If you would tell me how to nominate these images, I would do so. I work mostly in English Wikipedia and am very familiar with setting up deletion nominations there. Lately, however, I have spent some time in Commons. Thanks again for your file moves based on my requests. Wpollard (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tell the file names here to me - the ones you want to delete and the ones you want not to delete. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Marcus. IMO waren deine Löschungen überhastet. Der Benutzer scheint allenfalls die Berechtigung zu haben. Die Bilder hätten besser mit no permission getaggt werden sollen. --Leyo 15:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Möglich ist vieles, geht aber in keiner Weise aus den Angaben hervor. Bei Urheberrechtsfragen sollten wir kein Risiko eingehen. Wenn er zeigt, daß er die Bilder nutzen darf, kann man sie sicher gerne wiederherstellen. Würde mich aber interessieren, wo du das zu erkennen meinst (und das meine ich ernst, nicht daß das falsch ankommt, ich freue mich immer, wenn ich noch dazulernen kann, ich merke immer wieder, daß ich doch noch recht limitiert bin). Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bei Fotos, die schon mehrere Monate auf Commons sind und dann getaggt werden, kommt es auf einige Stunden (im getaggten Zustand) auch nicht mehr an. Der Uploader war ja gerade aktiv und es ist einfacher, sich über sichtbare Bilder zu unterhalten.

Betreffend deiner Frage: Ich habe den vom Benutzer hauptsächlich bearbeitete Artikel auf meiner Watchlist und auch schon mal mit ihm diskutiert. Da und heute auf seiner de-WP-Disk. hat er ein paar Angaben gemacht. --Leyo 17:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich muß gestehen, ich habe nicht danach geschaut, wie lange sie schon da sind. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin mit der Umbenennung nicht ganz glücklich. Der Fotograf hatte auf Flickr eine ganze Reihe von Bildern aus Jena gepostet, die ich auf Commons übertragen habe. Ich hatte auch überlegt, aussagekräftigere Namen zu wählen, aber dann die Originalnamen beibehalten, um zumindest den Seriencharakter der Bilder (und damit letztlich die Wiederauffindbarkeit) zu gewährleisten. Aber was solls .... --slg (talk) 17:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Weiterleitung müßte noch da sein. Aber bei der Masse an Bildern, die wir mittlerweile haben, müssen wir wirklich mehr auf die Namen achten. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Es ging mir vor allem um die Auffindbarkeit in einer Kategorie wie 2009 in Jena. Für größere Serien erscheint mir eine Sortierung nach Datum, Ort und fortlaufender Nummer durchaus ausreichend (was z.T. im Übrigen auch von sehr erfahrenen Wikifotografen nicht anders gehandhabt wird, siehe z.B. die ersten ca. 100 Bilder dieser Kategorie ;)); wichtiger als Dateinamen finde ich halbwegs aussagekräftige Bildbeschreibungen und Kategorisierungen. Ich habe übrigens einen großen Anteil an Bildern aus Gera und Jena selber kategorisiert, so leicht entwischt mir da keines, nur manchmal ist es halt ein mühsames Hinterherarbeiten ;) --slg (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vielleicht hast du eine Idee, wie man Datum uns bessere Erklärung verbinden kann? Ich verschiebe dir alle, was sein muß ;). Und ich muß unbedingt mal nach Jena... Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich will ja eben damit ausdrücken, dass es von mir aus keine Verschiebungen braucht ;) .... aber wenn, dann würde ich die Erklärung im Dateinamen ganz nach hinten setzen, damit die alphabetische Sortierung unbeeinträchtigt bleibt. Wenn also (erfundenes Beispiel) ein Bild als 2013-12-02 Jena 0001.jpg hochgeladen wird, dann könnte man es z.B. in 2013-12-02 Jena 0001 – Weihnachtsmarkt.jpg umbenennen. --slg (talk) 21:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soll an mir nicht scheitern. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alopekis dogs working with sheep.jpg The file was wrongly deleted. The photo is included in the article of the Greek wiki that I authored https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%91%CF%81%CF%87%CE%B5%CE%AF%CE%BF:%CE%A0%CE%BF%CE%B9%CE%BC%CE%B5%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AD%CF%82_%CE%91%CE%BB%CF%89%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%BA%CE%AF%CE%B4%CE%B5%CF%82_1960.jpg and carries a FREE licence. (see the licence in Greek wiki under the photo) The file was wrongly deleted. I am the author of both articles and legal user of the photo I wish the photo re-instated. I filed an undelete request. Thank you Fainomenon (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but why exactly you think you are allowed to use an image from 1960 with unknown photographer? Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because the file belongs to the archive of Amaltheia Society for the Preservation of Hellenic Native Breeds, of which I am a member, and I was given specific permission (copyright) by the Society to use it in the creation of articles about the breed in the English and other wikis and other media.

And why these information was not to find in the article? And why there's not an permission send to the Support team? How we should know, that this is correct what you say? There were so much people who told us a lot. We need at least some written words to the support team, so we can use an OTRS number. We talking about copyrights - they are often very problematic (and at the end this could become expensive), we must take this serious. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I am a new user and not very familiar with all the instructions yet.I did not see how I could have attached all this info to the file in the first place. I thought I selected the correct options for the file but that's obviously not the case. I am learning the wikimedia commons instructions as I go along, I find them very complicated and I am not an experienced user yet; I will e-mail OTRS with all the relevant information; I was astonished by the fact the file was deleted here despite the fact it is published in the Greek wiki with a free licence, and the information I supplied here about the source. Amaltheia Society's site is down at present otherwise I would have included it in the information. I am waiting for an e-mail message from the HQ of the Society before I proceed to write to the OTRS. I thought I had seven days' time to do that.Fainomenon (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Idea. I will help you as good as I can. I'm always happy, when we can solve a problem. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody posted a comment about one of your edits at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, but failed to notify you. Jcb (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in such PC discussions. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]