Commons:Office actions/DMCA notices: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→BP logo: answer to a few questions from wmf legal |
|||
Line 290:
:::As above, I will not re-open the DR (another amind might), but legal has said (a) it is above TOO; but (b) they aren't forced under copyright law to delete it due to fair use (which is not ok by Commons policy, see COM:CSD#G2). --[[User:Josve05a|Jonatan Svensson Glad]] ([[User talk:Josve05a|talk]]) 22:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|JSutherland (WMF)}} after thinking about all this, I suspect that when someone files a DMCA complaint that is invalid because the file is legal per fair use, you won't take action. Which, I think, is actually good. But could you drop the community a note in that case? Perhaps on the village pump, or my talk page (I tend to agree with you so I wouldn't mind proxying for you) Starting the DR yourself might not be ideal because it would put a certain weight on things. Unless you use an anonymous alternative account that isn't in any way connected to the WMF to start the DR. That would also be fine. - [[User talk:Alexis Jazz|Alexis Jazz]] <sup><small>ping plz</small></sup> 15:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
|