Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Adamvase

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Adamvase}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Adamvase

Status: to be archived • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 12:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Adamvase (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected related users

Gapingprolapse (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: LTA, similar vandalism. Both accounts are blocked (see here and here), but maybe there's an IP range to block? Trijnstel_talk 12:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed - Sorry, Trijnstel, I did look into this yesterday when you pinged at ANV but forget to note the same. For reference, this also the LTA that's been posting with lewd user names (and comments) to User talk:GorillaWarfare. Эlcobbola _talk 13:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Elcobbola: Alright, thanks. And is there an IP address or range to block? (Because I didn't see a block.) Plus, I assume Bigveinydick4Molly (talk · contribs) isn't related? This account isn't blocked btw, so you might wish to block it anyway, related or not. ;-) Trijnstel_talk 14:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - That account is related, as is Spawtew, etc. It was globally blocked yesterday, which is why I did not block it locally, but it looks like a steward action (hiding/oversighting/deleting due to the name) caused the local account to decouple. I've now blocked it locally. I don't want to comment on IP issues for privacy reasons, but it will be handled. Эlcobbola _talk 14:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.