Commons:Deletion requests/File:Association for Germanic Heathenry (Verein für Germanisches Heidentum) logo.png
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=1){kind=link}
I don't think it can not pass threshold of originality. −ebraminiotalk 17:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
- Well, actually I think that, according to COM:TO, it is simple enough to stay, being the logo of an organisation made up just of a common symbol plus a text in red.--Wewelsburger (talk) 17:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- The symbol in the center looks pretty complex. Then again, the German TOO is ridiculously high... darkweasel94 20:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- I can't say that the symbol in the middle is a common one. Brrr...., somewhere in the middle between not to complex and just over the limit. TO probably ok on German Wikipedia. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- The symbol in the center looks pretty complex. Then again, the German TOO is ridiculously high... darkweasel94 20:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
The central symbol is a variation on the Irminsul -- a reconstruction of what File:Externsteine relief irminsul detail.jpg / File:Brockhaus-Efron_Extersteine.jpg might look like unbent... AnonMoos (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
IMHO this logo is over the Threshold of originality. Some of the other logos Wewelsburger have uploaded are even more over the threshold than this one. / Achird (talk) 13:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Seems too complex for PD shape on Commons. I'd suggest uploading it to local wikis under fair use FASTILY 08:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
_logo.png&oldid=101494057){kind=link}