Welcome at my talk page. Use it, don't send me email.

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise)

File:Vuurwerk 14 juli.JPG

 
File:Vuurwerk 14 juli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JackPotte (talk • contribs) 21:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

FP Nomination

 

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:FEMA - 12695 - Photograph by Barry Markowitz taken on 02-19-2005 in American Samoa.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FEMA - 12695 - Photograph by Barry Markowitz taken on 02-19-2005 in American Samoa.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:WLANL_-_mchangsp_-_090626-110151_1482_50D.jpg

 
File:WLANL_-_mchangsp_-_090626-110151_1482_50D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 14:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:WLANL_-_mchangsp_-_090626-105929_1472_50D.jpg

 
File:WLANL_-_mchangsp_-_090626-105929_1472_50D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 14:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Template:Potd description

Is het misschien ook mogelijk om een delay in te bouwen van 31 dagen in de robot? Dan hoeft bij het overhevelen van de onderschriften naar de Nederlandstalige wiki (nl:Sjabloon:POTD_onderschrift) niet steeds de code van Template:Potd description er weer om weg gehaald te worden. Na 31 dagen volgt normaliter de volgende maand en kunnen de oude onderschriften (van de vorige maand) dan worden gearchiveerd/gecategoriseerd met het sjabloon. --Hardscarf (talk) 23:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Eigenlijk wil ik juist de boel bijhouden omdat het snel zo rommelig wordt. Waarom wordt het overzetten eigenlijk handmatig gedaan? Zou toch zo automatisch moeten kunnen? Die template code haal je er trouwens vrij makkelijk af met een reguliere expressie. Multichill (talk) 12:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Als je een manier weet om het automatisch te doen, hou ik mij aanbevolen. Het wordt nu gekopieerd vanaf een automatisch gegenereerde lijst hier. En wat bedoel je met 'reguliere expressie'? - ik kan het grootste deel er met search en replace wel uithalen in bijvoorbeeld MS-Word, maar voor elke dag staat er weer een nieuwe datum bij variabele 5 (bv. 5=01, 5=02 etc.), zodat alle onderschriften allemaal moeten worden nagelopen om die datum weer te wissen. Als je een betere manier weet, graag, maar anders zou ik graag opteren voor een delay (ik maakte de onderschriften met opzet al zo veel mogelijk aan in de laatste dagen van de maand om de bot te kunnen ontlopen, maar nu heeft dat blijkbaar ook geen zin meer) - de onderschriften staan allemaal in een formaat, zodat de rommel ook na 31 dagen toch netjes wordt opgeruimd door de bot? Of zijn er andere problemen? --Hardscarf (talk) 15:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

COM:PS

Hi Multichill, I'm - apart from this deletion request - not too experienced on Commons. It would be great if you could tell me which part of the PS includes File:Geschändetehostie.jpg. Thank you very much. --Atlan da Gonozal (talk) 11:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The part about possible educational usage (it was used). Trying to get something deleted by a narrow interpretation of scope won't get you anywhere here. Multichill (talk) 12:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

@Multichill, I’m quite disappointed how „easy“ you closed this rfd. Your rationale “We don't delete … tasteless, offensive or because you don't like it” shows to me that you haven’t really taken the time/pain to read through the discussion, which would have been your duty, as I don’t have to tell you as an admin-colleague. Otherwise you might have noted that there are other problems with this image beyond offensiveness as I[1] and a few others have pointed out. I’m well aware that any decision in such a case is difficult, but one shouldn’t take it that easy. Just for you to know, I’ve put a {{Fact disputed}} tag on the image as there is no proof of the validity of the claim in the description. --Túrelio (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I did read it and that's why I came to this conclusion. Multichill (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The amount of delete votes on DRs like this always leads people to think that we can just brush aside one of our most fundamental policies. Anyway, I just want to say I completely support the closure and would have done the same (it would have qualified for a speedy close in my book since any amount of discussion won't change the outcome). Rocket000 (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timeline energy companies NL.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent PNG quality. ZooFari 19:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Evil Poles needed

Done! odder (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Your translations are visible at {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-example}} (pl). Multichill (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Heidenhoek_Brunsveldweg.JPG

Hi Multichill, you're from the Dutch wikipedia. aren't you? The above mentioned file has been speedy deleted 3 days ago. I didn't react because I wasn't in office during the X-mas period. The photo was taken by me in January last year, so I felt free to reload it with the proper tags. I hope this OK? The picture was used in the article nl:Heidenhoek, but I can't repair that due to some problems that arose there. Peter HO (dutch wiki)/Peter O (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm also active at nlwp. If it's own work, why did you add source/author = Stichting Achterhoek Weer Mooi ? Multichill (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bot's reattribution of my photo

Hello again, Multichill, and Happy New Year! I see your BotMultichillT has cleverly replaced my own description and details of a photo of mine with the details from a Geograph page that someone had added an external link to some time ago. I have put my own original details back. Please can you make sure it doesn't do it again? Cheers, SiGarb (talk) 23:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, that was not supposed to happen! Was a one time big cleaning operation because unfortunatly a lot of Geograph images were lacking information. This was to prepare for Commons:Batch uploading/Geograph. Multichill (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

User:D-Kuru/licence

Two short questions: 1) What was so bad about {{Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.0-at}}? It was based on {{Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} which still exists.
2) Is that yellow box with the red border at the top of User:D-Kuru/licence not big enough or did you just give a fuck on it? May the text ("You are NOT allowed to edit this template! If you have any ideas or want to change something (e.g. the categorisation) contact me!") was just too difficult to understand... It was not a coincidence that 01-AT and 02-CBS2 had the same entry even there was no actual need for it. Even I'm not editing a page every day I have a look at least once a day on my talk page so there was no need for that change. Thanks for your attention --D-Kuru (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  1. It was not a non-standard, barely used, not translated Creative Commons license tag. It's now replace with standard license tags which have at least 20 translations
  2. I didn't notice it. Big shiny notices look like spam so I stopped noticing them long ago. Even if I did I would probably have changed it anyway in the spirit of the Wiki.
Multichill (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

re 'Hold on' note

 
Only bunnies are allowed to hop here

Hi Multichill - presume you mean those empty 'Avenues in ....' categories? If you're sure they'll fill, they can easily be re-made, but as they'd been lying empty for the best part of 2 months they didn't serve any useful purpose as of when I found them. I left the one for Avenues in UK (and added some files to it) even though that was also empty before today. - MPF (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

See User talk:MPF#Hold on. Please don't hop talk pages. Multichill (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

No--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template:Creative Commons

Thanks, you're right. It was my mistake.--Trixt (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:Please help replace this outdated license

Español: Yo no soy el autor. Las imágenes de símbolos de Galicia publicadas en el "Diario Oficial de Galicia" (DOG) están en el dominio público. Si las desean ustedes borrar, bórrenlas; puesto que yo no soy el autor, no me importa demasiado puesto que, además, si aparecen en el "Diario Oficial de Galicia" se admiten sin problemas en la Wikipedia gallega

All the simbols of Galicia are PD if the source is DOG (oficial publication of the government of Galicia)--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 20:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.. Multichill (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
No, this is not my problem--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
You're barking up the wrong tree. Multichill (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I can't understand. If you want, you can delete these images. There are these images in gl.wp:

I don't want anything, I just ran a notification bot for Zscout370, so contact him. Multichill (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
No. Zscout370 don't speak spanish, portgal language or galician language (!!!). My english is very poor
Galego: Xamais sería quen de expresar o que tería que expresar
--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Marrovi

 
Only bunnies are allowed to hop here

yes, ok Ichange for this templete. See you! --Marrovi (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

See User talk:Marrovi. Please don't hop talk pages. Multichill (talk) 11:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

COM:AN/V

I know that you are very experienced and rich in ideas in source categorization, please have an eye on Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#JarektBot_.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contributions.29. Thank you, --Martin H. (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Left a comment over there. Multichill (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bot message

While I appreciate your message, I think your bot should leave messsages on the home project discussion page, especially if a note exists on the talk page. Is there a standard way to signal this and to instruct a bot to do this? --M7 (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're talking about this message? That's a one time run for User:Zscout370. My bots only notify users on Commons talk pages. Multichill (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Okay then, thank you for your answer. --M7 (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories

Hello Multichill, thanks for advising, I was wondering how to deal with this issue... Djoehana (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Wim_Delvoye.jpg

 
File:Wim_Delvoye.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

PD template warnings

Please put PD template warnings to the original uploaders talk pages for files

but not on my talk page. See them in the description pages, ekz. for File:Kleiner Ameisenhügel.jpg it is de:Benutzer:TomK32. Maksim (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply