ليمن (سياسة)

لِيمن دْ السياسة ؤلا الجْناح اللِيمني هما بزاف ديال الفكار و لإديولوجيات السياسية لي كيعتابرو بلي شي نواع د لأنضيما الجتيماعية و لهيراركيات عاديين و مزيانين و مرغوب فيهوم،^[1]^[2]^[3] و بشكل عام كيدعمو لقانون الطبيعي، السلطة، لملكية لخاصة و التقاليد ف لقتيصاد و ف السياسة.^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10] لهيراركيات و اللامساواة كيتشافو من هاد لمنضور كا نتيجة طبيعية ل لإختلافات لإجتماعية،^[11]^[12] و التنافس ف لإقتصاد د السوق.^[13]^[14]^[15]

پوسطيرة ضد الشيوعية ف روسيا (جوايه 1932)

الضد ديال ليمن ف السياسة هوّ ليسر السياسي لي بشكل عام كيسعى ل تحقيق لمساواة ف لمجتمع و كيعارض الطبقية.^[16]

عيون لكلام

^ Johnson، Paul (2005). "Right-wing, rightist". A Politics Glossary. Auburn University website. مأرشيڤي من لأصل ف 19 غشت 2014. تطّالع عليه ب تاريخ 23 أكتوبر 2014.
^ Bobbio، Norberto؛ Cameron، Allan (1996). Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 51, 62. ردمك 978-0-226-06246-4.
^ Goldthorpe، J.E. (1985). An Introduction to Sociology (طبعة Third). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ص. 156. ردمك 978-0-521-24545-6.
^ "Right". Encyclopædia Britannica (ب نڭليزية). 2009-04-15. تطّالع عليه ب تاريخ 2022-05-22.
^ Carlisle، Rodney P. (2005). Encyclopedia of Politics: The Left and the Right. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: SAGE Publishing. ردمك 978-1-4129-0409-4.
^ T. Alexander Smith, Raymond Tatalovich. Cultures at war: moral conflicts in western democracies. Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd, 2003. p. 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.' In other words, the sociological perspective sees preservationist politics as a right-wing attempt to defend privilege within the social hierarchy."
^ Left and right: the significance of a political distinction, Norberto Bobbio and Allan Cameron, p. 37, University of Chicago Press, 1997.
^ Seymour Martin Lipset, cited in Fuchs, D., and Klingemann, H. 1990. The left-right schema. pp. 203–34 in Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed.M.Jennings et al. Berlin:de Gruyter
^ Lukes, Steven. 'Epilogue: The Grand Dichotomy of the Twentieth Century': concluding chapter to T. Ball and R. Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. pp.610–612
^ Clark، William Roberts (2003). Capitalism, Not Globalism: Capital Mobility, Central Bank Independence, and the Political Control of the Economy (طبعة [Online-Ausg.].). Ann Arbor [u.a.]: University of Michigan Press. ردمك 978-0-472-11293-7.^{[page needed]}
^ Smith, T. Alexander and Raymond Tatalovich. Cultures at War: Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies (Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd., 2003) p. 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.'
^ Gidron, N؛ Ziblatt, D. (2019). "Center-right political parties in advanced democracies 2019" (PDF). Annual Review of Political Science. 22: 23. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750. Defining the right by its adherence to the status quo is closely associated with a definition of the right as a defense of inequality (Bobbio 1996, Jost 2009, Luna & Kaltwasser 2014). As noted by Jost (2009), within the context of Western political development, opposition to change is often synonymous with support for inequality. Notwithstanding its prominence in the literature, we are hesitant to adopt this definition of the right since it requires the researcher to interpret ideological claims according to an abstract understanding of equality. For instance, Noel & Therien (2008) argue that right-wing opposition to affirmative action speaks in the name of equality and rejects positive discrimination based on demographic factors. From this perspective, the right is not inegalitarian but is "differently egalitarian" (Noel & Therien 2008, p. 18).
^ Scruton, Roger "A Dictionary of Political Thought" "Defined by contrast to (or perhaps more accurately conflict with) the left the term right does not even have the respectability of a history. As now used it denotes several connected and also conflicting ideas (including) 1)conservative, and perhaps authoritarian, doctrines concerning the nature of civil society, with emphasis on custom, tradition, and allegiance as social bonds ... 8) belief in free enterprise free markets and a capitalist economy as the only mode of production compatible with human freedom and suited to the temporary nature of human aspirations ..." pp. 281–2, Macmillan, 1996
^ Goldthorpe، J.E. (1985). An Introduction to Sociology (طبعة 3rd). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ص. 156. ردمك 978-0-521-24545-6. There are ... those who accept inequality as natural, normal, and even desirable. Two main lines of thought converge on the Right or conservative side...the truly Conservative view is that there is a natural hierarchy of skills and talents in which some people are born leaders, whether by heredity or family tradition. ... now ... the more usual right-wing view, which may be called 'liberal-conservative', is that unequal rewards are right and desirable so long as the competition for wealth and power is a fair one.
^ Gidron, N؛ Ziblatt, D. (2019). "Center-right political parties in advanced democracies 2019" (PDF). Annual Review of Political Science. 22: 24. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750. ...since different currents within the right are drawn to different visions of societal structures. For example, market liberals see social relations as stratified by natural economic inequalities. Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (معاونة)
^ McClosky، Herbert؛ Chong، Dennis (July 1985). "Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals". British Journal of Political Science (ب نڭليزية). 15 (3): 329–363. doi:10.1017/S0007123400004221. ISSN 1469-2112. Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (معاونة)

هادي زريعة ديال مقالة خاصها تّوسع. تقدر تشارك ف لكتبة ديالها.

[1] Johnson، Paul (2005). "Right-wing, rightist". A Politics Glossary. Auburn University website. مأرشيڤي من لأصل ف 19 غشت 2014. تطّالع عليه ب تاريخ 23 أكتوبر 2014.

[2] Bobbio، Norberto؛ Cameron، Allan (1996). Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 51, 62. ردمك 978-0-226-06246-4.

[autogenerated1-3] Goldthorpe، J.E. (1985). An Introduction to Sociology (طبعة Third). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ص. 156. ردمك 978-0-521-24545-6.

[4] "Right". Encyclopædia Britannica (ب نڭليزية). 2009-04-15. تطّالع عليه ب تاريخ 2022-05-22.

[Carlisle-5] Carlisle، Rodney P. (2005). Encyclopedia of Politics: The Left and the Right. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: SAGE Publishing. ردمك 978-1-4129-0409-4.

[T._Alexander_Smith_2003._p._30-6] T. Alexander Smith, Raymond Tatalovich. Cultures at war: moral conflicts in western democracies. Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd, 2003. p. 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.' In other words, the sociological perspective sees preservationist politics as a right-wing attempt to defend privilege within the social hierarchy."

[Allan_Cameron_pg._37-7] Left and right: the significance of a political distinction, Norberto Bobbio and Allan Cameron, p. 37, University of Chicago Press, 1997.

[Fuchs,_D._1990._p._203-8] Seymour Martin Lipset, cited in Fuchs, D., and Klingemann, H. 1990. The left-right schema. pp. 203–34 in Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed.M.Jennings et al. Berlin:de Gruyter

[Lukes-9] Lukes, Steven. 'Epilogue: The Grand Dichotomy of the Twentieth Century': concluding chapter to T. Ball and R. Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. pp.610–612

[Clark-10] Clark، William Roberts (2003). Capitalism, Not Globalism: Capital Mobility, Central Bank Independence, and the Political Control of the Economy (طبعة [Online-Ausg.].). Ann Arbor [u.a.]: University of Michigan Press. ردمك 978-0-472-11293-7.^{[page needed]}

[11] Smith, T. Alexander and Raymond Tatalovich. Cultures at War: Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies (Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd., 2003) p. 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.'

[12] Gidron, N؛ Ziblatt, D. (2019). "Center-right political parties in advanced democracies 2019" (PDF). Annual Review of Political Science. 22: 23. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750. Defining the right by its adherence to the status quo is closely associated with a definition of the right as a defense of inequality (Bobbio 1996, Jost 2009, Luna & Kaltwasser 2014). As noted by Jost (2009), within the context of Western political development, opposition to change is often synonymous with support for inequality. Notwithstanding its prominence in the literature, we are hesitant to adopt this definition of the right since it requires the researcher to interpret ideological claims according to an abstract understanding of equality. For instance, Noel & Therien (2008) argue that right-wing opposition to affirmative action speaks in the name of equality and rejects positive discrimination based on demographic factors. From this perspective, the right is not inegalitarian but is "differently egalitarian" (Noel & Therien 2008, p. 18).

[13] Scruton, Roger "A Dictionary of Political Thought" "Defined by contrast to (or perhaps more accurately conflict with) the left the term right does not even have the respectability of a history. As now used it denotes several connected and also conflicting ideas (including) 1)conservative, and perhaps authoritarian, doctrines concerning the nature of civil society, with emphasis on custom, tradition, and allegiance as social bonds ... 8) belief in free enterprise free markets and a capitalist economy as the only mode of production compatible with human freedom and suited to the temporary nature of human aspirations ..." pp. 281–2, Macmillan, 1996

[14] Goldthorpe، J.E. (1985). An Introduction to Sociology (طبعة 3rd). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ص. 156. ردمك 978-0-521-24545-6. There are ... those who accept inequality as natural, normal, and even desirable. Two main lines of thought converge on the Right or conservative side...the truly Conservative view is that there is a natural hierarchy of skills and talents in which some people are born leaders, whether by heredity or family tradition. ... now ... the more usual right-wing view, which may be called 'liberal-conservative', is that unequal rewards are right and desirable so long as the competition for wealth and power is a fair one.

[15] Gidron, N؛ Ziblatt, D. (2019). "Center-right political parties in advanced democracies 2019" (PDF). Annual Review of Political Science. 22: 24. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750. ...since different currents within the right are drawn to different visions of societal structures. For example, market liberals see social relations as stratified by natural economic inequalities. Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (معاونة)

[16] McClosky، Herbert؛ Chong، Dennis (July 1985). "Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals". British Journal of Political Science (ب نڭليزية). 15 (3): 329–363. doi:10.1017/S0007123400004221. ISSN 1469-2112. Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (معاونة)

[1]