-
Towards Clinical AI Fairness: Filling Gaps in the Puzzle
Authors:
Mingxuan Liu,
Yilin Ning,
Salinelat Teixayavong,
Xiaoxuan Liu,
Mayli Mertens,
Yuqing Shang,
Xin Li,
Di Miao,
Jie Xu,
Daniel Shu Wei Ting,
Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng,
Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong,
Zhen Ling Teo,
Ting Fang Tan,
Narrendar RaviChandran,
Fei Wang,
Leo Anthony Celi,
Marcus Eng Hock Ong,
Nan Liu
Abstract:
The ethical integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare necessitates addressing fairness-a concept that is highly context-specific across medical fields. Extensive studies have been conducted to expand the technical components of AI fairness, while tremendous calls for AI fairness have been raised from healthcare. Despite this, a significant disconnect persists between technical adva…
▽ More
The ethical integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare necessitates addressing fairness-a concept that is highly context-specific across medical fields. Extensive studies have been conducted to expand the technical components of AI fairness, while tremendous calls for AI fairness have been raised from healthcare. Despite this, a significant disconnect persists between technical advancements and their practical clinical applications, resulting in a lack of contextualized discussion of AI fairness in clinical settings. Through a detailed evidence gap analysis, our review systematically pinpoints several deficiencies concerning both healthcare data and the provided AI fairness solutions. We highlight the scarcity of research on AI fairness in many medical domains where AI technology is increasingly utilized. Additionally, our analysis highlights a substantial reliance on group fairness, aiming to ensure equality among demographic groups from a macro healthcare system perspective; in contrast, individual fairness, focusing on equity at a more granular level, is frequently overlooked. To bridge these gaps, our review advances actionable strategies for both the healthcare and AI research communities. Beyond applying existing AI fairness methods in healthcare, we further emphasize the importance of involving healthcare professionals to refine AI fairness concepts and methods to ensure contextually relevant and ethically sound AI applications in healthcare.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Towards clinical AI fairness: A translational perspective
Authors:
Mingxuan Liu,
Yilin Ning,
Salinelat Teixayavong,
Mayli Mertens,
Jie Xu,
Daniel Shu Wei Ting,
Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng,
Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong,
Zhen Ling Teo,
Ting Fang Tan,
Ravi Chandran Narrendar,
Fei Wang,
Leo Anthony Celi,
Marcus Eng Hock Ong,
Nan Liu
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated the ability to extract insights from data, but the issue of fairness remains a concern in high-stakes fields such as healthcare. Despite extensive discussion and efforts in algorithm development, AI fairness and clinical concerns have not been adequately addressed. In this paper, we discuss the misalignment between technical and clinical perspectives o…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated the ability to extract insights from data, but the issue of fairness remains a concern in high-stakes fields such as healthcare. Despite extensive discussion and efforts in algorithm development, AI fairness and clinical concerns have not been adequately addressed. In this paper, we discuss the misalignment between technical and clinical perspectives of AI fairness, highlight the barriers to AI fairness' translation to healthcare, advocate multidisciplinary collaboration to bridge the knowledge gap, and provide possible solutions to address the clinical concerns pertaining to AI fairness.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Federated and distributed learning applications for electronic health records and structured medical data: A scoping review
Authors:
Siqi Li,
Pinyan Liu,
Gustavo G. Nascimento,
Xinru Wang,
Fabio Renato Manzolli Leite,
Bibhas Chakraborty,
Chuan Hong,
Yilin Ning,
Feng Xie,
Zhen Ling Teo,
Daniel Shu Wei Ting,
Hamed Haddadi,
Marcus Eng Hock Ong,
Marco Aurélio Peres,
Nan Liu
Abstract:
Federated learning (FL) has gained popularity in clinical research in recent years to facilitate privacy-preserving collaboration. Structured data, one of the most prevalent forms of clinical data, has experienced significant growth in volume concurrently, notably with the widespread adoption of electronic health records in clinical practice. This review examines FL applications on structured medi…
▽ More
Federated learning (FL) has gained popularity in clinical research in recent years to facilitate privacy-preserving collaboration. Structured data, one of the most prevalent forms of clinical data, has experienced significant growth in volume concurrently, notably with the widespread adoption of electronic health records in clinical practice. This review examines FL applications on structured medical data, identifies contemporary limitations and discusses potential innovations. We searched five databases, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, to identify articles that applied FL to structured medical data and reported results following the PRISMA guidelines. Each selected publication was evaluated from three primary perspectives, including data quality, modeling strategies, and FL frameworks. Out of the 1160 papers screened, 34 met the inclusion criteria, with each article consisting of one or more studies that used FL to handle structured clinical/medical data. Of these, 24 utilized data acquired from electronic health records, with clinical predictions and association studies being the most common clinical research tasks that FL was applied to. Only one article exclusively explored the vertical FL setting, while the remaining 33 explored the horizontal FL setting, with only 14 discussing comparisons between single-site (local) and FL (global) analysis. The existing FL applications on structured medical data lack sufficient evaluations of clinically meaningful benefits, particularly when compared to single-site analyses. Therefore, it is crucial for future FL applications to prioritize clinical motivations and develop designs and methodologies that can effectively support and aid clinical practice and research.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.