-
Multipartite Ramsey numbers of complete bipartite graphs arising from algebraic combinatorial structures
Authors:
I Wayan Palton Anuwiksa,
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Edy Tri Baskoro
Abstract:
In 2019, Perondi and Carmelo determined the set multipartite Ramsey number of particular complete bipartite graphs by establishing a relationship between the set multipartite Ramsey number, Hadamard matrices, and strongly regular graphs, which is a breakthrough in Ramsey theory. However, since Hadamard matrices of order not divisible by 4 do not exist, many open problems have arisen.
In this pap…
▽ More
In 2019, Perondi and Carmelo determined the set multipartite Ramsey number of particular complete bipartite graphs by establishing a relationship between the set multipartite Ramsey number, Hadamard matrices, and strongly regular graphs, which is a breakthrough in Ramsey theory. However, since Hadamard matrices of order not divisible by 4 do not exist, many open problems have arisen.
In this paper, we generalize Perondi and Carmelo's results by introducing the $[α]$-Hadamard matrix that we conjecture exists for arbitrary order. Finally, we determine set and size multipartite Ramsey numbers for particular complete bipartite graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Multiset Dimensions of Trees
Authors:
Yusuf Hafidh,
Rizki Kurniawan,
Suhadi Saputro,
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Steven Tanujaya,
Saladin Uttunggadewa
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a connected graph and $W$ be a set of vertices of $G$. The representation multiset of a vertex $v$ with respect to $W$, $r_m (v|W)$, is defined as a multiset of distances between $v$ and the vertices in $W$. If $r_m (u |W) \neq r_m(v|W)$ for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$, then $W$ is called an m-resolving set of $G$. If $G$ has an m-resolving set, then the cardinality of a…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a connected graph and $W$ be a set of vertices of $G$. The representation multiset of a vertex $v$ with respect to $W$, $r_m (v|W)$, is defined as a multiset of distances between $v$ and the vertices in $W$. If $r_m (u |W) \neq r_m(v|W)$ for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$, then $W$ is called an m-resolving set of $G$. If $G$ has an m-resolving set, then the cardinality of a smallest m-resolving set is called the multiset dimension of $G$, denoted by $md(G)$; otherwise, we say that $md(G) = \infty$.
In this paper, we show that for a tree $T$ of diameter at least 2, if $md(T) < \infty$, then $md(T) \leq n-2$. We conjecture that this bound is not sharp in general and propose a sharp upper bound. We shall also provide necessary and sufficient conditions for caterpillars and lobsters having finite multiset dimension. Our results partially settled a conjecture and an open problem proposed in [4].
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
$D$-Magic and Antimagic Labelings of Hypercubes
Authors:
Palton Anuwiksa,
Akihiro Munemasa,
Rinovia Simanjuntak
Abstract:
For a set of distances $D$, a graph $G$ of order $n$ is said to be $D-$magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots, n\}$ and a constant $k$ such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y) =k$, where $N_D(x)=\{y|d(y,x)=j, j\in D\}$.
In this paper we shall find sets of distances $D$s, such that the hypercube is $D-$magic. We shall utilise well-known properties of (bipart…
▽ More
For a set of distances $D$, a graph $G$ of order $n$ is said to be $D-$magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots, n\}$ and a constant $k$ such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y) =k$, where $N_D(x)=\{y|d(y,x)=j, j\in D\}$.
In this paper we shall find sets of distances $D$s, such that the hypercube is $D-$magic. We shall utilise well-known properties of (bipartite) distance-regular graphs to construct the $D-$magic labelings.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2019; v1 submitted 12 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
$D$-Magic Strongly Regular Graphs
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Palton Anuwiksa
Abstract:
For a set of distances $D$, a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices is said to be $D$-magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , n\}$ and a constant $k$ such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y) = k$, where $N_D(x)=\{y|d(x,y)=i, i\in D\}$ is the $D$-neighbourhood set of $x$.
In this paper we utilize spectra of graphs to characterize strongly regular graphs which are $D$-m…
▽ More
For a set of distances $D$, a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices is said to be $D$-magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , n\}$ and a constant $k$ such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y) = k$, where $N_D(x)=\{y|d(x,y)=i, i\in D\}$ is the $D$-neighbourhood set of $x$.
In this paper we utilize spectra of graphs to characterize strongly regular graphs which are $D$-magic, for all possible distance sets $D$. In addition, we provide necessary conditions for distance regular graphs of diameter 3 to be $\{1\}$-magic.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2019; v1 submitted 11 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Distance magic labelings of product graphs
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
I Wayan Palton Anuwiksa
Abstract:
A graph $G$ is said to be distance magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , v\}$ and a constant {\sf k} such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N(x)} f(y) ={\sf k}$, where $N_(x)$ is the set of all neighbours of $x$.
In this paper we shall study distance magic labelings of graphs obtained from four graph products: cartesian, strong, lexicographic, and cronecker. We sh…
▽ More
A graph $G$ is said to be distance magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , v\}$ and a constant {\sf k} such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N(x)} f(y) ={\sf k}$, where $N_(x)$ is the set of all neighbours of $x$.
In this paper we shall study distance magic labelings of graphs obtained from four graph products: cartesian, strong, lexicographic, and cronecker. We shall utilise magic rectangle sets and magic column rectangles to construct the labelings.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
The multiset dimension of graphs
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Presli Siagian,
Tomas Vetrik
Abstract:
We introduce a variation of metric dimension, called the multiset dimension. The representation multiset of a vertex $v$ with respect to $W$ (which is a subset of the vertex set of a graph $G$), $r_m (v|W)$, is defined as a multiset of distances between $v$ and the vertices in $W$. If $r_m (u |W) \neq r_m(v|W)$ for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$, then $W$ is called an m-resolving set…
▽ More
We introduce a variation of metric dimension, called the multiset dimension. The representation multiset of a vertex $v$ with respect to $W$ (which is a subset of the vertex set of a graph $G$), $r_m (v|W)$, is defined as a multiset of distances between $v$ and the vertices in $W$. If $r_m (u |W) \neq r_m(v|W)$ for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$, then $W$ is called an m-resolving set of $G$. If $G$ has an m-resolving set, then the cardinality of a smallest m-resolving set is called the multiset dimension of $G$, denoted by $md(G)$. If $G$ does not contain an m-resolving set, we write $md(G) = \infty$.
In this paper we present basic results on the multiset dimension. We obtain some (sharp) bounds for multiset dimension of arbitrary graphs in term of its metric dimension, order, or diameter. We provide some necessary conditions for a graph to have finite multiset dimension, with an example of an infinite family of graphs where those necessary conditions are also sufficient. We also show that the multiset dimension of any graph other than a path is at least $3$ and finally we provide two families of graphs having the multiset dimension $3$.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2019; v1 submitted 1 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
The local metric dimension of subgraph-amalgamation of graphs
Authors:
Gabriel A. Barragan-Ramirez,
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Suhadi W. Saputro,
Saladin Uttunggadewa
Abstract:
A vertex $v$ is said to distinguish two other vertices $x$ and $y$ of a nontrivial connected graph G if the distance from $v$ to $x$ is different from the distance from $v$ to $y$. A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is a local metric set for $G$ if every two adjacent vertices of $G$ are distinguished by some vertex of $S$. A local metric set with minimum cardinality is called a local metric basis for $G$ and…
▽ More
A vertex $v$ is said to distinguish two other vertices $x$ and $y$ of a nontrivial connected graph G if the distance from $v$ to $x$ is different from the distance from $v$ to $y$. A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is a local metric set for $G$ if every two adjacent vertices of $G$ are distinguished by some vertex of $S$. A local metric set with minimum cardinality is called a local metric basis for $G$ and its cardinality, the local metric dimension of $G$, denoted by $\dim_l(G)$. In this paper we present tight bounds for the local metric dimension of subgraph-amalgamation of graphs with special emphasis in the case of subgraphs which are isometric embeddings.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Metric Dimension of Amalgamation of Regular Graphs
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Danang Tri Murdiansyah
Abstract:
A set of vertices $S$ resolves a graph $G$ if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. The metric dimension of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$.
Let $\{G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n\}$ be a finite collection of graphs and each $G_i$ has a fixed vertex $v_{0_i}$ or a fixed edge $e_{0_i}$ called a terminal vertex or edge, respectively.…
▽ More
A set of vertices $S$ resolves a graph $G$ if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. The metric dimension of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$.
Let $\{G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n\}$ be a finite collection of graphs and each $G_i$ has a fixed vertex $v_{0_i}$ or a fixed edge $e_{0_i}$ called a terminal vertex or edge, respectively. The vertex-amalgamation of $G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n$, denoted by $Vertex-Amal\{G_i;v_{0_i}\}$, is formed by taking all the $G_i$'s and identifying their terminal vertices. Similarly, the edge-amalgamation of $G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n$, denoted by $Edge-Amal\{G_i;e_{0_i}\}$, is formed by taking all the $G_i$'s and identifying their terminal edges.
Here we study the metric dimensions of vertex-amalgamation and edge-amalgamation for finite collection of regular graphs: complete graphs and prisms.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Super edge-magic deficiency of join-product graphs
Authors:
A. A. G. Ngurah,
Rinovia Simanjuntak
Abstract:
A graph $G$ is called \textit{super edge-magic} if there exists a bijective function $f$ from $V(G) \cup E(G)$ to $\{1, 2, \ldots, |V(G) \cup E(G)|\}$ such that $f(V(G)) = \{1, 2, \ldots, |V(G)|\}$ and $f(x) + f(xy) + f(y)$ is a constant $k$ for every edge $xy$ of $G$. Furthermore, the \textit{super edge-magic deficiency} of a graph $G$ is either the minimum nonnegative integer $n$ such that…
▽ More
A graph $G$ is called \textit{super edge-magic} if there exists a bijective function $f$ from $V(G) \cup E(G)$ to $\{1, 2, \ldots, |V(G) \cup E(G)|\}$ such that $f(V(G)) = \{1, 2, \ldots, |V(G)|\}$ and $f(x) + f(xy) + f(y)$ is a constant $k$ for every edge $xy$ of $G$. Furthermore, the \textit{super edge-magic deficiency} of a graph $G$ is either the minimum nonnegative integer $n$ such that $G \cup nK_1$ is super edge-magic or $+\infty$ if there exists no such integer.
\emph{Join product} of two graphs is their graph union with additional edges that connect all vertices of the first graph to each vertex of the second graph. In this paper, we study the super edge-magic deficiencies of a wheel minus an edge and join products of a path, a star, and a cycle, respectively, with isolated vertices.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2014; v1 submitted 18 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Directed Metric Dimension of Oriented Graphs with Cyclic Covering
Authors:
Sigit Pancahayani,
Rinovia Simanjuntak
Abstract:
Let $D$ be a strongly connected oriented graph with vertex-set $V$ and arc-set $A$. The distance from a vertex $u$ to another vertex $v$, $d(u,v)$ is the minimum length of oriented paths from $u$ to $v$. Suppose $B=\{b_1,b_2,b_3,...b_k\}$ is a nonempty ordered subset of $V$. The representation of a vertex $v$ with respect to $B$, $r(v|B)$, is defined as a vector…
▽ More
Let $D$ be a strongly connected oriented graph with vertex-set $V$ and arc-set $A$. The distance from a vertex $u$ to another vertex $v$, $d(u,v)$ is the minimum length of oriented paths from $u$ to $v$. Suppose $B=\{b_1,b_2,b_3,...b_k\}$ is a nonempty ordered subset of $V$. The representation of a vertex $v$ with respect to $B$, $r(v|B)$, is defined as a vector $(d(v,b_1), d(v,b_2), ..., d(v,b_k))$. If any two distinct vertices $u,v$ satisfy $r(u|B)\neq r(v|B)$, then $B$ is said to be a resolving set of $D$. If the cardinality of $B$ is minimum then $B$ is said to be a basis of $D$ and the cardinality of $B$ is called the directed metric dimension of $D$.
Let $G$ be the underlying graph of $D$ admitting a $C_n$-covering. A $C_n$-simple orientation is an orientation on $G$ such that every $C_n$ in $D$ is strongly connected. This paper deals with metric dimensions of oriented wheels, oriented fans, and amalgamation of oriented cycles, all of which admitting $C_n$-simple orientations.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2014; v1 submitted 5 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Magic labelings of distance at most 2
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Mona Elviyenti,
Mohammad Navie Jauhari,
Alfan Sukmana Praja,
Ira Apni Purwasih
Abstract:
For an arbitrary set of distances $D\subseteq \{0,1, \ldots, d\}$, a graph $G$ is said to be $D$-distance magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , v\}$ and a constant {\sf k} such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y) ={\sf k}$, where $N_D(x) = \{y \in V| d(x,y) \in D\}$.
In this paper we study some necessary or sufficient conditions for the existence of $D$-…
▽ More
For an arbitrary set of distances $D\subseteq \{0,1, \ldots, d\}$, a graph $G$ is said to be $D$-distance magic if there exists a bijection $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , v\}$ and a constant {\sf k} such that for any vertex $x$, $\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y) ={\sf k}$, where $N_D(x) = \{y \in V| d(x,y) \in D\}$.
In this paper we study some necessary or sufficient conditions for the existence of $D$-distance magic graphs, some of which are generalization of conditions for the existence of $\{1\}$-distance magic graphs. More specifically, we study $D$-distance magic labelings for cycles and $D$-distance magic graphs for $D\subseteq\{0,1,2\}$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
On Distance Antimagic Graphs
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Kristiana Wijaya
Abstract:
For an arbitrary set of distances $D\subseteq \{0,1, \ldots, diam(G)\}$, a $D$-weight of a vertex $x$ in a graph $G$ under a vertex labeling $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , v\}$ is defined as $w_D(x)=\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y)$, where $N_D(x) = \{y \in V| d(x,y) \in D\}$. A graph $G$ is said to be $D$-distance magic if all vertices has the same $D$-vertex-weight, it is said to be $D$-distance antimag…
▽ More
For an arbitrary set of distances $D\subseteq \{0,1, \ldots, diam(G)\}$, a $D$-weight of a vertex $x$ in a graph $G$ under a vertex labeling $f:V\rightarrow \{1,2, \ldots , v\}$ is defined as $w_D(x)=\sum_{y\in N_D(x)} f(y)$, where $N_D(x) = \{y \in V| d(x,y) \in D\}$. A graph $G$ is said to be $D$-distance magic if all vertices has the same $D$-vertex-weight, it is said to be $D$-distance antimagic if all vertices have distinct $D$-vertex-weights, and it is called $(a,d)-D$-distance antimagic if the $D$-vertex-weights constitute an arithmetic progression with difference $d$ and starting value $a$.
In this paper we study some necessary conditions for the existence of $D$-distance antimagic graphs. We conjecture that such conditions are also sufficient. Additionally, we study $\{1\}$-distance antimagic labelings for some cycle-related connected graphs: cycles, suns, prisms, complete graphs, wheels, fans, and friendship graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Metric Dimension of Amalgamation of Graphs
Authors:
Rinovia Simanjuntak,
Saladin Uttunggadewa,
Suhadi Wido Saputro
Abstract:
A set of vertices $S$ resolves a graph $G$ if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. The metric dimension of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$.
Let $\{G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n\}$ be a finite collection of graphs and each $G_i$ has a fixed vertex $v_{0_i}$ or a fixed edge $e_{0_i}$ called a terminal vertex or edge, respectively.…
▽ More
A set of vertices $S$ resolves a graph $G$ if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. The metric dimension of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$.
Let $\{G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n\}$ be a finite collection of graphs and each $G_i$ has a fixed vertex $v_{0_i}$ or a fixed edge $e_{0_i}$ called a terminal vertex or edge, respectively. The \emph{vertex-amalgamation} of $G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n$, denoted by $Vertex-Amal\{G_i;v_{0_i}\}$, is formed by taking all the $G_i$'s and identifying their terminal vertices. Similarly, the \emph{edge-amalgamation} of $G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_n$, denoted by $Edge-Amal\{G_i;e_{0_i}\}$, is formed by taking all the $G_i$'s and identifying their terminal edges.
Here we study the metric dimensions of vertex-amalgamation and edge-amalgamation for finite collection of arbitrary graphs. We give lower and upper bounds for the dimensions, show that the bounds are tight, and construct infinitely many graphs for each possible value between the bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2013; v1 submitted 1 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
