Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Pinto, A C A

Phases of the electronic two-level model under the rotating wave approximation

Authors: M. T. Thomaz, A. C. Aguiar Pinto, M. Moutinho

Abstract: We present the time evolution of the electronic two-level model in the rotating wave approximation (RWA). We calculate the Aharonov-Anandan phase of the vector states with cyclic evolution either within the period of an external monochromatic electric field or the period corresponding to Rabi's frequency. The Aharonov-Anandan phase is shown to be dependent on the initial vector state, unless the s… ▽ More We present the time evolution of the electronic two-level model in the rotating wave approximation (RWA). We calculate the Aharonov-Anandan phase of the vector states with cyclic evolution either within the period of an external monochromatic electric field or the period corresponding to Rabi's frequency. The Aharonov-Anandan phase is shown to be dependent on the initial vector state, unless the system evolves in the adiabatic regime; in the latter case, the Aharonov-Anandan phase recovers Berry's phase. Our results are also discussed in the quasi-resonant regime. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2010; originally announced April 2010.

Comments: 18 pages, no figures

Contribution of adiabatic phases to noncyclic evolution

Authors: M. T. Thomaz, A. C. Aguiar Pinto, M. Moutinho

Abstract: We show that the difference of adiabatic phases, that are basis-dependent, in noncyclic evolution of non-degenerate quantum systems have to be taken into account to give the correct interference result in the calculation of physical quantities in states that are a superposition of instantaneous eigenstates of energy. To verify the contribution of those adiabatic phases in the interference phenom… ▽ More We show that the difference of adiabatic phases, that are basis-dependent, in noncyclic evolution of non-degenerate quantum systems have to be taken into account to give the correct interference result in the calculation of physical quantities in states that are a superposition of instantaneous eigenstates of energy. To verify the contribution of those adiabatic phases in the interference phenomena, we consider the spin-1/2 model coupled to a precessing external magnetic field. In the model, the adiabatic phase increases in time up to reach the difference of the Berry's phases of the model when the external magnetic field completes a period. △ Less

Submitted 5 August, 2009; originally announced August 2009.

Comments: 7 pages, no figure

Berry's phase in the two-level model

Authors: A. C. Aguiar Pinto, M. Moutinho, M. T. Thomaz

Abstract: We study the adiabatic evolution of a two-level model in the presence of an external classical electric field. The coupling between the quantum model and the classical field is taken in the electric dipole approximation. In this regime, we show the absence of geometric phases in the interacting two-level model in the presence of any periodic real time-dependent classical electric field. We obtai… ▽ More We study the adiabatic evolution of a two-level model in the presence of an external classical electric field. The coupling between the quantum model and the classical field is taken in the electric dipole approximation. In this regime, we show the absence of geometric phases in the interacting two-level model in the presence of any periodic real time-dependent classical electric field. We obtain a conservative scalar potential in the calculation of Berry's phases of the instantaneous eigenstates of the model. For complex electric fields, we recover the existence of geometric phases. In particular, the geometric phases of the instantaneous eigenstates of the model in the presence of a positive or of a negative frequency component of the monochromatic electric field differ by an overall sign. As a check on our results, we map this interacting two-level model onto a spin-1/2 model under the action of a classical magnetic field. We confirm that the first one acquires Berry's phase only in the rotating wave approximation [RWA]. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2009; originally announced April 2009.

Comments: 11 pages, no figure

Journal ref: Braz. J. Phys. vol.39, n.2, pp. 326-330 (2009).

Temperature inversion symmetry in the Casimir effect with an antiperiodic boundary condition

Authors: A. C. Aguiar Pinto, T. M. Britto, F. Pascoal, F. S. S. da Rosa

Abstract: We present explicitly another example of a temperature inversion symmetry in the Casimir effect for a nonsymmetric boundary condition. We also give an interpretation for our result. We present explicitly another example of a temperature inversion symmetry in the Casimir effect for a nonsymmetric boundary condition. We also give an interpretation for our result. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2003; originally announced May 2003.

Comments: 4 pages

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. D67, 107701 (2003)

Imaginary Phases in Two-Level Model with Spontaneous Decay

Authors: A. C. Aguiar Pinto, M. T. Thomaz

Abstract: We study a two-level model coupled to the electromagnetic vacuum and to an external classic electric field with fixed frequency. The amplitude of the external electric field is supposed to vary very slow in time. Garrison and Wright [{\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf A128} (1988) 177] used the non-hermitian Hamiltonian approach to study the adiabatic limit of this model and obtained that the probability of… ▽ More We study a two-level model coupled to the electromagnetic vacuum and to an external classic electric field with fixed frequency. The amplitude of the external electric field is supposed to vary very slow in time. Garrison and Wright [{\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf A128} (1988) 177] used the non-hermitian Hamiltonian approach to study the adiabatic limit of this model and obtained that the probability of this two-level system to be in its upper level has an imaginary geometric phase. Using the master equation for describing the time evolution of the two-level system we obtain that the imaginary phase due to dissipative effects is time dependent, in opposition to Garrison and Wright result. The present results show that the non-hermitian hamiltonian method should not be used to discuss the nature of the imaginary phases in open systems. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2003; v1 submitted 8 July, 2002; originally announced July 2002.

Comments: 11 pages, new version, to appear in J. Phys. A

Journal ref: J.Phys.A36:7461-7467,2003

Adiabatic Approximation in the Density Matrix Approach: Non-Degenerate Systems

Authors: A. C. Aguiar Pinto, K. M. Fonseca Romero, M. T. Thomaz

Abstract: We study the adiabatic limit in the density matrix approach for a quantum system coupled to a weakly dissipative medium. The energy spectrum of the quantum model is supposed to be non-degenerate. In the absence of dissipation, the geometric phases for periodic Hamiltonians obtained previously by M.V. Berry are recovered in the present approach. We determine the necessary condition satisfied by t… ▽ More We study the adiabatic limit in the density matrix approach for a quantum system coupled to a weakly dissipative medium. The energy spectrum of the quantum model is supposed to be non-degenerate. In the absence of dissipation, the geometric phases for periodic Hamiltonians obtained previously by M.V. Berry are recovered in the present approach. We determine the necessary condition satisfied by the coefficients of the linear expansion of the non-unitary part of the Liouvillian in order to the imaginary phases acquired by the elements of the density matrix, due to dissipative effects, be geometric. The results derived are model-independent. We apply them to spin 1/2 model coupled to reservoir at thermodynamic equilibrium. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2002; v1 submitted 6 January, 2002; originally announced January 2002.

Comments: 24 pages (new version), accepted for publication in Physica A

Journal ref: Physica A, vol.: 311, (2002) 169-187

Berry's Phase in the Presence of a Dissipative Medium

Authors: K. M. Fonseca Romero, A. C. Aguiar Pinto, M. T. Thomaz

Abstract: We consider the spin 1/2 model coupled to a slowly varying magnetic field in the presence of a weak damping represented by a Lindblad-form operators. We show that Berry's geometrical phase remains unaltered by the two dissipation mechanism considered. Dissipation effects are twofold: a shrinking in the modulus of the Bloch's vector, which characterizes coherence loss and a time dependent (dissip… ▽ More We consider the spin 1/2 model coupled to a slowly varying magnetic field in the presence of a weak damping represented by a Lindblad-form operators. We show that Berry's geometrical phase remains unaltered by the two dissipation mechanism considered. Dissipation effects are twofold: a shrinking in the modulus of the Bloch's vector, which characterizes coherence loss and a time dependent (dissipation related) precession angle. We show that the line broadening of the Fourier transformation of the components of magnetization is only due to the presence of dissipation. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2002; v1 submitted 14 March, 2000; originally announced March 2000.

Comments: 19 pages, 2 figures

Journal ref: Physica {\bf A307} (2002) 142

Comment on the Adiabatic Condition

Authors: A. C. Aguiar Pinto, M. C. Nemes, J. G. Peixoto de Faria, M. T. Thomaz

Abstract: The experimental observation of effects due to Berry's phase in quantum systems is certainly one of the most impressive demonstrations of the correctness of the superposition principle in quantum mechanics. Since Berry's original paper in 1984, the spin 1/2 coupled with rotating external magnetic field has been one of the most studied models where those phases appear. We also consider a special… ▽ More The experimental observation of effects due to Berry's phase in quantum systems is certainly one of the most impressive demonstrations of the correctness of the superposition principle in quantum mechanics. Since Berry's original paper in 1984, the spin 1/2 coupled with rotating external magnetic field has been one of the most studied models where those phases appear. We also consider a special case of this soluble model. A detailed analysis of the coupled differential equations and comparison with exact results teach us why the usual procedure (of neglecting nondiagonal terms) is mathematically sound. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2000; v1 submitted 7 December, 1999; originally announced December 1999.

Comments: 9 pages

Journal ref: Am. J. of Phys. {\bf 68} (2000) 955-958