Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Panahi, P M

Investigating the Interplay of Prioritized Replay and Generalization

Authors: Parham Mohammad Panahi, Andrew Patterson, Martha White, Adam White

Abstract: Experience replay, the reuse of past data to improve sample efficiency, is ubiquitous in reinforcement learning. Though a variety of smart sampling schemes have been introduced to improve performance, uniform sampling by far remains the most common approach. One exception is Prioritized Experience Replay (PER), where sampling is done proportionally to TD errors, inspired by the success of prioriti… ▽ More Experience replay, the reuse of past data to improve sample efficiency, is ubiquitous in reinforcement learning. Though a variety of smart sampling schemes have been introduced to improve performance, uniform sampling by far remains the most common approach. One exception is Prioritized Experience Replay (PER), where sampling is done proportionally to TD errors, inspired by the success of prioritized sweeping in dynamic programming. The original work on PER showed improvements in Atari, but follow-up results were mixed. In this paper, we investigate several variations on PER, to attempt to understand where and when PER may be useful. Our findings in prediction tasks reveal that while PER can improve value propagation in tabular settings, behavior is significantly different when combined with neural networks. Certain mitigations $-$ like delaying target network updates to control generalization and using estimates of expected TD errors in PER to avoid chasing stochasticity $-$ can avoid large spikes in error with PER and neural networks but generally do not outperform uniform replay. In control tasks, none of the prioritized variants consistently outperform uniform replay. We present new insight into the interaction between prioritization, bootstrapping, and neural networks and propose several improvements for PER in tabular settings and noisy domains. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2024; v1 submitted 12 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: Published in the Reinforcement Learning Conference 2024

A New View on Planning in Online Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Kevin Roice, Parham Mohammad Panahi, Scott M. Jordan, Adam White, Martha White

Abstract: This paper investigates a new approach to model-based reinforcement learning using background planning: mixing (approximate) dynamic programming updates and model-free updates, similar to the Dyna architecture. Background planning with learned models is often worse than model-free alternatives, such as Double DQN, even though the former uses significantly more memory and computation. The fundament… ▽ More This paper investigates a new approach to model-based reinforcement learning using background planning: mixing (approximate) dynamic programming updates and model-free updates, similar to the Dyna architecture. Background planning with learned models is often worse than model-free alternatives, such as Double DQN, even though the former uses significantly more memory and computation. The fundamental problem is that learned models can be inaccurate and often generate invalid states, especially when iterated many steps. In this paper, we avoid this limitation by constraining background planning to a set of (abstract) subgoals and learning only local, subgoal-conditioned models. This goal-space planning (GSP) approach is more computationally efficient, naturally incorporates temporal abstraction for faster long-horizon planning and avoids learning the transition dynamics entirely. We show that our GSP algorithm can propagate value from an abstract space in a manner that helps a variety of base learners learn significantly faster in different domains. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: Published in the Planning and Reinforcement Learning Workshop at ICAPS 2024. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2206.02902

K-percent Evaluation for Lifelong RL

Authors: Golnaz Mesbahi, Parham Mohammad Panahi, Olya Mastikhina, Martha White, Adam White

Abstract: In continual or lifelong reinforcement learning, access to the environment should be limited. If we aspire to design algorithms that can run for long periods, continually adapting to new, unexpected situations, then we must be willing to deploy our agents without tuning their hyperparameters over the agent's entire lifetime. The standard practice in deep RL, and even continual RL, is to assume unf… ▽ More In continual or lifelong reinforcement learning, access to the environment should be limited. If we aspire to design algorithms that can run for long periods, continually adapting to new, unexpected situations, then we must be willing to deploy our agents without tuning their hyperparameters over the agent's entire lifetime. The standard practice in deep RL, and even continual RL, is to assume unfettered access to the deployment environment for the full lifetime of the agent. In this paper, we propose a new approach for evaluating lifelong RL agents where only k percent of the experiment data can be used for hyperparameter tuning. We then conduct an empirical study of DQN and SAC across a variety of continuing and non-stationary domains. We find agents generally perform poorly when restricted to k-percent tuning, whereas several algorithmic mitigations designed to maintain network plasticity perform surprisingly well. △ Less

Submitted 25 May, 2024; v1 submitted 2 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Goal-Space Planning with Subgoal Models

Authors: Chunlok Lo, Kevin Roice, Parham Mohammad Panahi, Scott Jordan, Adam White, Gabor Mihucz, Farzane Aminmansour, Martha White

Abstract: This paper investigates a new approach to model-based reinforcement learning using background planning: mixing (approximate) dynamic programming updates and model-free updates, similar to the Dyna architecture. Background planning with learned models is often worse than model-free alternatives, such as Double DQN, even though the former uses significantly more memory and computation. The fundament… ▽ More This paper investigates a new approach to model-based reinforcement learning using background planning: mixing (approximate) dynamic programming updates and model-free updates, similar to the Dyna architecture. Background planning with learned models is often worse than model-free alternatives, such as Double DQN, even though the former uses significantly more memory and computation. The fundamental problem is that learned models can be inaccurate and often generate invalid states, especially when iterated many steps. In this paper, we avoid this limitation by constraining background planning to a set of (abstract) subgoals and learning only local, subgoal-conditioned models. This goal-space planning (GSP) approach is more computationally efficient, naturally incorporates temporal abstraction for faster long-horizon planning and avoids learning the transition dynamics entirely. We show that our GSP algorithm can propagate value from an abstract space in a manner that helps a variety of base learners learn significantly faster in different domains. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2024; v1 submitted 6 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.