Showing 1–13 of 13 results for author: Lovering, C

Are Language Model Logits Calibrated?

Authors: Charles Lovering, Michael Krumdick, Viet Dac Lai, Nilesh Kumar, Varshini Reddy, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Chris Tanner

Abstract: Some information is factual (e.g., "Paris is in France"), whereas other information is probabilistic (e.g., "the coin flip will be a [Heads/Tails]."). We believe that good Language Models (LMs) should understand and reflect this nuance. Our work investigates this by testing if LMs' output probabilities are calibrated to their textual contexts. We define model "calibration" as the degree to which t… ▽ More Some information is factual (e.g., "Paris is in France"), whereas other information is probabilistic (e.g., "the coin flip will be a [Heads/Tails]."). We believe that good Language Models (LMs) should understand and reflect this nuance. Our work investigates this by testing if LMs' output probabilities are calibrated to their textual contexts. We define model "calibration" as the degree to which the output probabilities of candidate tokens are aligned with the relative likelihood that should be inferred from the given context. For example, if the context concerns two equally likely options (e.g., heads or tails for a fair coin), the output probabilities should reflect this. Likewise, context that concerns non-uniformly likely events (e.g., rolling a six with a die) should also be appropriately captured with proportionate output probabilities. We find that even in simple settings the best LMs (1) are poorly calibrated, and (2) have systematic biases (e.g., preferred colors and sensitivities to word orderings). For example, gpt-4o-mini often picks the first of two options presented in the prompt regardless of the options' implied likelihood, whereas Llama-3.1-8B picks the second. Our other consistent finding is mode-collapse: Instruction-tuned models often over-allocate probability mass on a single option. These systematic biases introduce non-intuitive model behavior, making models harder for users to understand. △ Less

Submitted 21 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Comments: 10 pages (main), 24 pages (appendix), under review

SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA

Authors: Viet Dac Lai, Michael Krumdick, Charles Lovering, Varshini Reddy, Craig Schmidt, Chris Tanner

Abstract: The financial domain frequently deals with large numbers of long documents that are essential for daily operations. Significant effort is put towards automating financial data analysis. However, a persistent challenge, not limited to the finance domain, is the scarcity of datasets that accurately reflect real-world tasks for model evaluation. Existing datasets are often constrained by size, contex… ▽ More The financial domain frequently deals with large numbers of long documents that are essential for daily operations. Significant effort is put towards automating financial data analysis. However, a persistent challenge, not limited to the finance domain, is the scarcity of datasets that accurately reflect real-world tasks for model evaluation. Existing datasets are often constrained by size, context, or relevance to practical applications. Moreover, LLMs are currently trained on trillions of tokens of text, limiting access to novel data or documents that models have not encountered during training for unbiased evaluation. We propose SEC-QA, a continuous dataset generation framework with two key features: 1) the semi-automatic generation of Question-Answer (QA) pairs spanning multiple long context financial documents, which better represent real-world financial scenarios; 2) the ability to continually refresh the dataset using the most recent public document collections, not yet ingested by LLMs. Our experiments show that current retrieval augmented generation methods systematically fail to answer these challenging multi-document questions. In response, we introduce a QA system based on program-of-thought that improves the ability to perform complex information retrieval and quantitative reasoning pipelines, thereby increasing QA accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models

Authors: Stella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Lintang Sutawika, Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Alham Fikri Aji, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Sidney Black, Jordan Clive, Anthony DiPofi, Julen Etxaniz, Benjamin Fattori, Jessica Zosa Forde, Charles Foster, Jeffrey Hsu, Mimansa Jaiswal, Wilson Y. Lee, Haonan Li, Charles Lovering, Niklas Muennighoff, Ellie Pavlick, Jason Phang, Aviya Skowron, Samson Tan , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Effective evaluation of language models remains an open challenge in NLP. Researchers and engineers face methodological issues such as the sensitivity of models to evaluation setup, difficulty of proper comparisons across methods, and the lack of reproducibility and transparency. In this paper we draw on three years of experience in evaluating large language models to provide guidance and lessons… ▽ More Effective evaluation of language models remains an open challenge in NLP. Researchers and engineers face methodological issues such as the sensitivity of models to evaluation setup, difficulty of proper comparisons across methods, and the lack of reproducibility and transparency. In this paper we draw on three years of experience in evaluating large language models to provide guidance and lessons for researchers. First, we provide an overview of common challenges faced in language model evaluation. Second, we delineate best practices for addressing or lessening the impact of these challenges on research. Third, we present the Language Model Evaluation Harness (lm-eval): an open source library for independent, reproducible, and extensible evaluation of language models that seeks to address these issues. We describe the features of the library as well as case studies in which the library has been used to alleviate these methodological concerns. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

DocFinQA: A Long-Context Financial Reasoning Dataset

Authors: Varshini Reddy, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Viet Dac Lai, Michael Krumdick, Charles Lovering, Chris Tanner

Abstract: For large language models (LLMs) to be effective in the financial domain -- where each decision can have a significant impact -- it is necessary to investigate realistic tasks and data. Financial professionals often interact with documents that are hundreds of pages long, but most financial research datasets only deal with short excerpts from these documents. To address this, we introduce a long-d… ▽ More For large language models (LLMs) to be effective in the financial domain -- where each decision can have a significant impact -- it is necessary to investigate realistic tasks and data. Financial professionals often interact with documents that are hundreds of pages long, but most financial research datasets only deal with short excerpts from these documents. To address this, we introduce a long-document financial QA task. We augment 7,437 questions from the existing FinQA dataset with the full-document context, extending the average context length from under 700 words in FinQA to 123k words in DocFinQA. We conduct extensive experiments over retrieval-based QA pipelines and long-context language models. DocFinQA proves a significant challenge for even state-of-the-art systems. We also provide a case-study on the longest documents in DocFinQA and find that models particularly struggle on these documents. Addressing these challenges may have a wide reaching impact across applications where specificity and long-range contexts are critical, like gene sequences and legal document contract analysis. △ Less

Submitted 29 February, 2024; v1 submitted 12 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 13 pages

BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance

Authors: Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Michael Krumdick, Viet Lai, Varshini Reddy, Charles Lovering, Chris Tanner

Abstract: Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-… ▽ More Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model's financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2024; v1 submitted 11 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Work in progress

Deep Neural Networks Can Learn Generalizable Same-Different Visual Relations

Authors: Alexa R. Tartaglini, Sheridan Feucht, Michael A. Lepori, Wai Keen Vong, Charles Lovering, Brenden M. Lake, Ellie Pavlick

Abstract: Although deep neural networks can achieve human-level performance on many object recognition benchmarks, prior work suggests that these same models fail to learn simple abstract relations, such as determining whether two objects are the same or different. Much of this prior work focuses on training convolutional neural networks to classify images of two same or two different abstract shapes, testi… ▽ More Although deep neural networks can achieve human-level performance on many object recognition benchmarks, prior work suggests that these same models fail to learn simple abstract relations, such as determining whether two objects are the same or different. Much of this prior work focuses on training convolutional neural networks to classify images of two same or two different abstract shapes, testing generalization on within-distribution stimuli. In this article, we comprehensively study whether deep neural networks can acquire and generalize same-different relations both within and out-of-distribution using a variety of architectures, forms of pretraining, and fine-tuning datasets. We find that certain pretrained transformers can learn a same-different relation that generalizes with near perfect accuracy to out-of-distribution stimuli. Furthermore, we find that fine-tuning on abstract shapes that lack texture or color provides the strongest out-of-distribution generalization. Our results suggest that, with the right approach, deep neural networks can learn generalizable same-different visual relations. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Training Priors Predict Text-To-Image Model Performance

Authors: Charles Lovering, Ellie Pavlick

Abstract: Text-to-image models can often generate some relations, i.e., "astronaut riding horse", but fail to generate other relations composed of the same basic parts, i.e., "horse riding astronaut". These failures are often taken as evidence that models rely on training priors rather than constructing novel images compositionally. This paper tests this intuition on the stablediffusion 2.1 text-to-image mo… ▽ More Text-to-image models can often generate some relations, i.e., "astronaut riding horse", but fail to generate other relations composed of the same basic parts, i.e., "horse riding astronaut". These failures are often taken as evidence that models rely on training priors rather than constructing novel images compositionally. This paper tests this intuition on the stablediffusion 2.1 text-to-image model. By looking at the subject-verb-object (SVO) triads that underlie these prompts (e.g., "astronaut", "ride", "horse"), we find that the more often an SVO triad appears in the training data, the better the model can generate an image aligned with that triad. Here, by aligned we mean that each of the terms appears in the generated image in the proper relation to each other. Surprisingly, this increased frequency also diminishes how well the model can generate an image aligned with the flipped triad. For example, if "astronaut riding horse" appears frequently in the training data, the image for "horse riding astronaut" will tend to be poorly aligned. Our results thus show that current models are biased to generate images with relations seen in training, and provide new data to the ongoing debate on whether these text-to-image models employ abstract compositional structure in a traditional sense, or rather, interpolate between relations explicitly seen in the training data. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2023; v1 submitted 23 May, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Evaluation Beyond Task Performance: Analyzing Concepts in AlphaZero in Hex

Authors: Charles Lovering, Jessica Zosa Forde, George Konidaris, Ellie Pavlick, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: AlphaZero, an approach to reinforcement learning that couples neural networks and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), has produced state-of-the-art strategies for traditional board games like chess, Go, shogi, and Hex. While researchers and game commentators have suggested that AlphaZero uses concepts that humans consider important, it is unclear how these concepts are captured in the network. We inve… ▽ More AlphaZero, an approach to reinforcement learning that couples neural networks and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), has produced state-of-the-art strategies for traditional board games like chess, Go, shogi, and Hex. While researchers and game commentators have suggested that AlphaZero uses concepts that humans consider important, it is unclear how these concepts are captured in the network. We investigate AlphaZero's internal representations in the game of Hex using two evaluation techniques from natural language processing (NLP): model probing and behavioral tests. In doing so, we introduce new evaluation tools to the RL community and illustrate how evaluations other than task performance can be used to provide a more complete picture of a model's strengths and weaknesses. Our analyses in the game of Hex reveal interesting patterns and generate some testable hypotheses about how such models learn in general. For example, we find that MCTS discovers concepts before the neural network learns to encode them. We also find that concepts related to short-term end-game planning are best encoded in the final layers of the model, whereas concepts related to long-term planning are encoded in the middle layers of the model. △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 10 pages, Neural Information Processing Systems 2022

BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

Authors: BigScience Workshop, :, Teven Le Scao, Angela Fan, Christopher Akiki, Ellie Pavlick, Suzana Ilić, Daniel Hesslow, Roman Castagné, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, François Yvon, Matthias Gallé, Jonathan Tow, Alexander M. Rush, Stella Biderman, Albert Webson, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Thomas Wang, Benoît Sagot, Niklas Muennighoff, Albert Villanova del Moral, Olatunji Ruwase, Rachel Bawden, Stas Bekman, Angelina McMillan-Major , et al. (369 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be able to perform new tasks based on a few demonstrations or natural language instructions. While these capabilities have led to widespread adoption, most LLMs are developed by resource-rich organizations and are frequently kept from the public. As a step towards democratizing this powerful technology, we present BLOOM, a 176B-parameter open-access… ▽ More Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be able to perform new tasks based on a few demonstrations or natural language instructions. While these capabilities have led to widespread adoption, most LLMs are developed by resource-rich organizations and are frequently kept from the public. As a step towards democratizing this powerful technology, we present BLOOM, a 176B-parameter open-access language model designed and built thanks to a collaboration of hundreds of researchers. BLOOM is a decoder-only Transformer language model that was trained on the ROOTS corpus, a dataset comprising hundreds of sources in 46 natural and 13 programming languages (59 in total). We find that BLOOM achieves competitive performance on a wide variety of benchmarks, with stronger results after undergoing multitask prompted finetuning. To facilitate future research and applications using LLMs, we publicly release our models and code under the Responsible AI License. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2023; v1 submitted 9 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networks

Authors: Charles Lovering, Ellie Pavlick

Abstract: Many complex problems are naturally understood in terms of symbolic concepts. For example, our concept of "cat" is related to our concepts of "ears" and "whiskers" in a non-arbitrary way. Fodor (1998) proposes one theory of concepts, which emphasizes symbolic representations related via constituency structures. Whether neural networks are consistent with such a theory is open for debate. We propos… ▽ More Many complex problems are naturally understood in terms of symbolic concepts. For example, our concept of "cat" is related to our concepts of "ears" and "whiskers" in a non-arbitrary way. Fodor (1998) proposes one theory of concepts, which emphasizes symbolic representations related via constituency structures. Whether neural networks are consistent with such a theory is open for debate. We propose unit tests for evaluating whether a system's behavior is consistent with several key aspects of Fodor's criteria. Using a simple visual concept learning task, we evaluate several modern neural architectures against this specification. We find that models succeed on tests of groundedness, modularlity, and reusability of concepts, but that important questions about causality remain open. Resolving these will require new methods for analyzing models' internal states. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2022; v1 submitted 28 July, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: TACL, In Press. 12 Pages

Self-play for Data Efficient Language Acquisition

Authors: Charles Lovering, Ellie Pavlick

Abstract: When communicating, people behave consistently across conversational roles: People understand the words they say and are able to produce the words they hear. To date, artificial agents developed for language tasks have lacked such symmetry, meaning agents trained to produce language are unable to understand it and vice-versa. In this work, we exploit the symmetric nature of communication in order… ▽ More When communicating, people behave consistently across conversational roles: People understand the words they say and are able to produce the words they hear. To date, artificial agents developed for language tasks have lacked such symmetry, meaning agents trained to produce language are unable to understand it and vice-versa. In this work, we exploit the symmetric nature of communication in order to improve both the efficiency and quality of language acquisition in learning agents. Specifically, we consider the setting in which an agent must learn to both understand and generate words in an existing language, but with the assumption that access to interaction with "oracle" speakers of the language is very limited. We show that using self-play as a substitute for direct supervision enables the agent to transfer its knowledge across roles (e.g. training as a listener but testing as a speaker) and make better inferences about the ground truth lexicon using only a handful of interactions with the oracle. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Does Data Augmentation Improve Generalization in NLP?

Authors: Rohan Jha, Charles Lovering, Ellie Pavlick

Abstract: Neural models often exploit superficial features to achieve good performance, rather than deriving more general features. Overcoming this tendency is a central challenge in areas such as representation learning and ML fairness. Recent work has proposed using data augmentation, i.e., generating training examples where the superficial features fail, as a means of encouraging models to prefer the str… ▽ More Neural models often exploit superficial features to achieve good performance, rather than deriving more general features. Overcoming this tendency is a central challenge in areas such as representation learning and ML fairness. Recent work has proposed using data augmentation, i.e., generating training examples where the superficial features fail, as a means of encouraging models to prefer the stronger features. We design a series of toy learning problems to test the hypothesis that data augmentation leads models to unlearn weaker heuristics, but not to learn stronger features in their place. We find partial support for this hypothesis: Data augmentation often hurts before it helps, and it is less effective when the preferred strong feature is much more difficult to extract than the competing weak feature. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2020; v1 submitted 30 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

Authors: Yuxiang Jiang, Tal Ronnen Oron, Wyatt T Clark, Asma R Bankapur, Daniel D'Andrea, Rosalba Lepore, Christopher S Funk, Indika Kahanda, Karin M Verspoor, Asa Ben-Hur, Emily Koo, Duncan Penfold-Brown, Dennis Shasha, Noah Youngs, Richard Bonneau, Alexandra Lin, Sayed ME Sahraeian, Pier Luigi Martelli, Giuseppe Profiti, Rita Casadio, Renzhi Cao, Zhaolong Zhong, Jianlin Cheng, Adrian Altenhoff, Nives Skunca , et al. (122 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Background: The increasing volume and variety of genotypic and phenotypic data is a major defining characteristic of modern biomedical sciences. At the same time, the limitations in technology for generating data and the inherently stochastic nature of biomolecular events have led to the discrepancy between the volume of data and the amount of knowledge gleaned from it. A major bottleneck in our a… ▽ More Background: The increasing volume and variety of genotypic and phenotypic data is a major defining characteristic of modern biomedical sciences. At the same time, the limitations in technology for generating data and the inherently stochastic nature of biomolecular events have led to the discrepancy between the volume of data and the amount of knowledge gleaned from it. A major bottleneck in our ability to understand the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to biological macromolecules, especially proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, accurately assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. Methodology: We have conducted the second Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. One hundred twenty-six methods from 56 research groups were evaluated for their ability to predict biological functions using the Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using the Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3,681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured significantly expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis also compared the best methods participating in CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. Conclusions: The top performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed the best methods from CAFA1, demonstrating that computational function prediction is improving. This increased accuracy can be attributed to the combined effect of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. △ Less

Submitted 2 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.

Comments: Submitted to Genome Biology