Showing 1–22 of 22 results for author: Koczkodaj, W W

Computationally efficient orthogonalization for pairwise comparisons method

Authors: Julio Benitez, Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, Adam Kowalczyk

Abstract: Orthogonalization is one of few mathematical methods conforming to mathematical standards for approximation. Finding a consistent PC matrix of a given an inconsistent PC matrix is the main goal of a pairwise comparisons method. We introduce an orthogonalization for pairwise comparisons matrix based on a generalized Frobenius inner matrix product. The proposed theory is supported by numerous exampl… ▽ More Orthogonalization is one of few mathematical methods conforming to mathematical standards for approximation. Finding a consistent PC matrix of a given an inconsistent PC matrix is the main goal of a pairwise comparisons method. We introduce an orthogonalization for pairwise comparisons matrix based on a generalized Frobenius inner matrix product. The proposed theory is supported by numerous examples and visualizations. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: online, submitted as 22 pages and 2 figures

MSC Class: 65F25 ACM Class: G.m; F.m

Journal ref: Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol 473, 2024

Combating harmful Internet use with peer assessment and differential evolution

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, M. Mazurek, W. Pedrycz, E. Rogalska, R. Roth, D. Strzalka, A. Szymanska, A. Wolny-Dominiak, M. Woodbury-Smith, O. S. Xue, R. Zbyrowski

Abstract: Harmful Internet use (HIU) is a term coined for the unintended use of the Internet. In this study, we propose a more accurate HIU measuring method based on the peer assessment and differential evolution approach. The sample data comprises a juvenile population in Poland; 267 subjects assessed 1,513 peers. In addition to classic statistical analysis, differential evolution has been employed. Result… ▽ More Harmful Internet use (HIU) is a term coined for the unintended use of the Internet. In this study, we propose a more accurate HIU measuring method based on the peer assessment and differential evolution approach. The sample data comprises a juvenile population in Poland; 267 subjects assessed 1,513 peers. In addition to classic statistical analysis, differential evolution has been employed. Results indicate that there may be a substantially higher rate of HIU than other studies have indicated. More accurate measurement of the adolescent population influx affected by HIU is needed for healthcare and welfare system planning. Presented in Prague, Czech Republic, 20-22 July 2022. △ Less

Submitted 31 December, 2022; originally announced January 2023.

ACM Class: J.7

Pairwise Comparisons Matrix Decomposition into Approximation and Orthogonal Component Using Lie Theory

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, V. W. Marek, Y. Yayli

Abstract: This paper examines the use of Lie group and Lie Algebra theory to construct the geometry of pairwise comparisons matrices. The Hadamard product (also known as coordinatewise, coordinate-wise, elementwise, or element-wise product) is analyzed in the context of inconsistency and inaccuracy by the decomposition method. The two designed components are the approximation and orthogonal components. Th… ▽ More This paper examines the use of Lie group and Lie Algebra theory to construct the geometry of pairwise comparisons matrices. The Hadamard product (also known as coordinatewise, coordinate-wise, elementwise, or element-wise product) is analyzed in the context of inconsistency and inaccuracy by the decomposition method. The two designed components are the approximation and orthogonal components. The decomposition constitutes the theoretical foundation for the multiplicative pairwise comparisons. Keywords: approximate reasoning, subjectivity, inconsistency, consistency-driven, pairwise comparison, matrix Lie group, Lie algebra, approximation, orthogonality, decomposition. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2021; v1 submitted 13 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures; Lie theory knowledge is needed; the decomposition of a PC matrix into an approximation component and orthogonal component (interpreted as the approximation error) was obtained. Without such decomposition, the pairwise comparisons method has remained incomplete for 722 years from its first scholarly presentation

MSC Class: 22E60; 22E15 ACM Class: H.1; I.2

On Orthogonal Projections on the Space of Consistent Pairwise Comparisons Matrices

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, R. Smarzewski, J. Szybowski

Abstract: In this study, the orthogonalization process for different inner products is applied to pairwise comparisons. Properties of consistent approximations of a given inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrix are examined. A method of a derivation of a priority vector induced by a pairwise comparison matrix for a given inner product has been introduced. The mathematical elegance of orthogonalization and… ▽ More In this study, the orthogonalization process for different inner products is applied to pairwise comparisons. Properties of consistent approximations of a given inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrix are examined. A method of a derivation of a priority vector induced by a pairwise comparison matrix for a given inner product has been introduced. The mathematical elegance of orthogonalization and its universal use in most applied sciences has been the motivating factor for this study. However, the finding of this study that approximations depend on the inner product assumed, is of considerable importance. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: Followup to: Koczkodaj, WW; Orlowski, M, An orthogonal basis for computing a consistent approximation to a pairwise comparisons matrix, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 34(10): 41-47. 1997

ACM Class: I.2

Journal ref: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 379-397, 2020

On the use of group theory to generalize elements of pairwise comparisons matrix: a cautionary note

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, F. Liu, V. W. Marek, J. Mazurek, M. Mazurek, L. Mikhailov, C. Özel, W. Pedrycz, A. Przelaskowski, A. Schumann, R. Smarzewski, D. Strzalka, J. Szybowski, Y. Yayli

Abstract: This paper examines the constricted use of group theory in the studies of pairwise comparisons. The presented approach is based on the application of the famous Levi Theorems of 1942 and 1943 for orderable groups. The theoretical foundation for multiplicative (ratio) pairwise comparisons has been provided. Counterexamples have been provided to support the theory. In our opinion, the scientific c… ▽ More This paper examines the constricted use of group theory in the studies of pairwise comparisons. The presented approach is based on the application of the famous Levi Theorems of 1942 and 1943 for orderable groups. The theoretical foundation for multiplicative (ratio) pairwise comparisons has been provided. Counterexamples have been provided to support the theory. In our opinion, the scientific community must be made aware of the limitations of using the group theory in pairwise comparisons. Groups, which are not torsion free, cannot be used for ratios by Levi's theorems. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2020; v1 submitted 16 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures

RatingScaleReduction package: stepwise rating scale item reduction without predictability loss

Authors: Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, Alicja Wolny-Dominiak

Abstract: This study presents an innovative method for reducing the number of rating scale items without predictability loss. The "area under the re- ceiver operator curve method" (AUC ROC) is used to implement in the RatingScaleReduction package posted on CRAN. Several cases have been used to illustrate how the stepwise method has reduced the number of rating scale items (variables). This study presents an innovative method for reducing the number of rating scale items without predictability loss. The "area under the re- ceiver operator curve method" (AUC ROC) is used to implement in the RatingScaleReduction package posted on CRAN. Several cases have been used to illustrate how the stepwise method has reduced the number of rating scale items (variables). △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 20 pages, 6 figures

MSC Class: 94A50; 62C25; 62C99; 62P10

Special cases of pairwise comparisons matrices represented by Toeplitz matrices

Authors: Viera Čerňanová, Waldemar W. Koczkodaj

Abstract: This study presents special cases of inconsistent pairwise comparisons PC matrices and analysis of their eigenvalue-based inconsistency index using mathematical methods. All studied special cases of PC matrices are Toeplitz matrices with only three different entries $1$, $x$, and $1/x$. A new type of circulant pairwise comparisons matrix has been introduced. Although this class of PC matrices may… ▽ More This study presents special cases of inconsistent pairwise comparisons PC matrices and analysis of their eigenvalue-based inconsistency index using mathematical methods. All studied special cases of PC matrices are Toeplitz matrices with only three different entries $1$, $x$, and $1/x$. A new type of circulant pairwise comparisons matrix has been introduced. Although this class of PC matrices may be perceived as restricted, it is general enough to cover numerous levels of eigenvalue-based inconsistency index from the lowest to the highest. Both exact mathematical expressions and estimations, where the exact expression was impossible to find, are provided △ Less

Submitted 10 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 20 pages, 1 figure, 1 table

MSC Class: 15B05; 93B60; 62J15

Journal ref: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2018, 95

On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, J. -P. Magnot, J. Mazurek, J. F. Peters, H. Rakhshani, M. Soltys, D. Strzałka, J. Szybowski, A. Tozzi

Abstract: In this study, we provide mathematical and practice-driven justification for using $[0,1]$ normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. The need for normalization, as well as problems with the lack of normalization, are presented. A new type of paradox of infinity is described. In this study, we provide mathematical and practice-driven justification for using $[0,1]$ normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. The need for normalization, as well as problems with the lack of normalization, are presented. A new type of paradox of infinity is described. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2017; v1 submitted 23 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: 15 pages, 3 figures

A Geometric Framework for the Inconsistency in Pairwise Comparisons

Authors: Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, Jean-Pierre Magnot

Abstract: In this study, a pairwise comparison matrix is generalized to the case when coefficients create Lie group $G$, non necessarily abelian. A necessary and sufficient criterion for pairwise comparisons matrices to be consistent is provided. Basic criteria for finding a nearest consistent pairwise comparisons matrix (extended to the class of group $G$) are proposed. A geometric interpretation of pairwi… ▽ More In this study, a pairwise comparison matrix is generalized to the case when coefficients create Lie group $G$, non necessarily abelian. A necessary and sufficient criterion for pairwise comparisons matrices to be consistent is provided. Basic criteria for finding a nearest consistent pairwise comparisons matrix (extended to the class of group $G$) are proposed. A geometric interpretation of pairwise comparisons matrices in terms of connections to a simplex is given. Approximate reasoning is more effective when inconsistency in data is reduced. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2018; v1 submitted 23 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.

Comments: Article withdrawn under the request of W. Koczkodaj

MSC Class: 03F25

Pairwise Comparisons Rating Scale Paradox

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj

Abstract: This study demonstrates that incorrect data are entered into a pairwise comparisons matrix for processing into weights for the data collected by a rating scale. Unprocessed rating scale data lead to a paradox. A solution to it, based on normalization, is proposed. This is an essential correction for virtually all pairwise comparisons methods using rating scales. The illustration of the relative er… ▽ More This study demonstrates that incorrect data are entered into a pairwise comparisons matrix for processing into weights for the data collected by a rating scale. Unprocessed rating scale data lead to a paradox. A solution to it, based on normalization, is proposed. This is an essential correction for virtually all pairwise comparisons methods using rating scales. The illustration of the relative error currently, taking place, is discussed. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2015; v1 submitted 23 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: 12 pages, 3 figure, 1 table, progress report, (practically) ready for submission, call for cooperation, call for corrections of formerly published results (especially related to AHP) which may go into tens of thousands

Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisons

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, J. -P. Magnot

Abstract: This study proposes revised axioms for defining inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. It is based on the new findings that "PC submatrix cannot have a worse inconsistency indicator than the PC matrix containing it" and that there must be a PC submatrix with the same inconsistency as the given PC matrix. This study also provides better reasoning for the need of normalization. It is a… ▽ More This study proposes revised axioms for defining inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. It is based on the new findings that "PC submatrix cannot have a worse inconsistency indicator than the PC matrix containing it" and that there must be a PC submatrix with the same inconsistency as the given PC matrix. This study also provides better reasoning for the need of normalization. It is a revision of axiomatization by Koczkodaj and Szwarc, 2014 which proposed axioms expressed informally with some deficiencies addressed in this study. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2023; v1 submitted 12 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: Project aborted, not published

A different perspective on a scale for pairwise comparisons

Authors: J. Fueloep, W. W. Koczkodaj, S. J. Szarek

Abstract: One of the major challenges for collective intelligence is inconsistency, which is unavoidable whenever subjective assessments are involved. Pairwise comparisons allow one to represent such subjective assessments and to process them by analyzing, quantifying and identifying the inconsistencies. We propose using smaller scales for pairwise comparisons and provide mathematical and practical justif… ▽ More One of the major challenges for collective intelligence is inconsistency, which is unavoidable whenever subjective assessments are involved. Pairwise comparisons allow one to represent such subjective assessments and to process them by analyzing, quantifying and identifying the inconsistencies. We propose using smaller scales for pairwise comparisons and provide mathematical and practical justifications for this change. Our postulate's aim is to initiate a paradigm shift in the search for a better scale construction for pairwise comparisons. Beyond pairwise comparisons, the results presented may be relevant to other methods using subjective scales. Keywords: pairwise comparisons, collective intelligence, scale, subjective assessment, inaccuracy, inconsistency. △ Less

Submitted 5 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Comments: 16 pages, 1 figure; the mathematical theory has been provided for the use of small scale (1 to 3) for pairwise comparisons (but not only)

Journal ref: Logic Journal of the IGPL Volume: 18 Issue: 6 Pages: 859-869 Published: DEC 2010

Managing Null Entries in Pairwise Comparisons

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, M. W. Herman, M. Orlowski

Abstract: This paper shows how to manage null entries in pairwise comparisons matrices. Although assessments can be imprecise, since subjective criteria are involved, the classical pairwise comparisons theory expects all of them to be available. In practice, some experts may not be able (or available) to provide all assessments. Therefore managing null entries is a necessary extension of the pairwise compar… ▽ More This paper shows how to manage null entries in pairwise comparisons matrices. Although assessments can be imprecise, since subjective criteria are involved, the classical pairwise comparisons theory expects all of them to be available. In practice, some experts may not be able (or available) to provide all assessments. Therefore managing null entries is a necessary extension of the pairwise comparisons method. It is shown that certain null entries can be recovered on the basis of the transitivity property which each pairwise comparisons matrix is expected to satisfy. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: 5 pages

The key properties of inconsistency indicators for a triad in pairwise comparison matrices

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, J. Szybowski

Abstract: Processing information, acquired by subjective assessments, involves inconsistency analysis in most (if not all) applications of which some are of considerable importance at a national level (see, Koczkodaj/Kulakowski/Ligenza, Scientometrics, 99(3): 911-926, 2014)A triad inconsistency axiomatization in pairwise comparisons was informally proposed in Koczkodaj/Szwarc, FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 132(4… ▽ More Processing information, acquired by subjective assessments, involves inconsistency analysis in most (if not all) applications of which some are of considerable importance at a national level (see, Koczkodaj/Kulakowski/Ligenza, Scientometrics, 99(3): 911-926, 2014)A triad inconsistency axiomatization in pairwise comparisons was informally proposed in Koczkodaj/Szwarc, FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 132(4): 485-500, 2014. This study, rectifies it by the use of the distance and theoretical proofs. Three key properties of the indicator are presented in this study and illustrated by several examples. △ Less

Submitted 5 August, 2015; v1 submitted 19 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: 8 pages, 14 references; creative use of the distance to define inconsistency in pairwise comparisons (project originated in 2014 but submitted for a review in July 2015)

An Algorithm for the Optimal Consistent Approximation to a Pairwise Comparisons Matrix by Orthogonal Projections

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, M. Orlowski

Abstract: The algorithm for finding the optimal consistent approximation of an inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrix is based on a logarithmic transformation of a pairwise comparisons matrix into a vector space with the Euclidean metric. Orthogonal basis is introduced in the vector space. The orthogonal projection of the transformed matrix onto the space formed by the images of consistent matrices is the… ▽ More The algorithm for finding the optimal consistent approximation of an inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrix is based on a logarithmic transformation of a pairwise comparisons matrix into a vector space with the Euclidean metric. Orthogonal basis is introduced in the vector space. The orthogonal projection of the transformed matrix onto the space formed by the images of consistent matrices is the required consistent approximation. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Journal ref: Computers & Mathematics with Applications,34(10): 41-47, 1997

An LP-based inconsistency monitoring of pairwise comparison matrices

Authors: S. Bozoki, J. Fulop, W. W. Koczkodaj

Abstract: A distance-based inconsistency indicator, defined by the third author for the consistency-driven pairwise comparisons method, is extended to the incomplete case. The corresponding optimization problem is transformed into an equivalent linear programming problem. The results can be applied in the process of filling in the matrix as the decision maker gets automatic feedback. As soon as a serious er… ▽ More A distance-based inconsistency indicator, defined by the third author for the consistency-driven pairwise comparisons method, is extended to the incomplete case. The corresponding optimization problem is transformed into an equivalent linear programming problem. The results can be applied in the process of filling in the matrix as the decision maker gets automatic feedback. As soon as a serious error occurs among the matrix elements, even due to a misprint, a significant increase in the inconsistency index is reported. The high inconsistency may be alarmed not only at the end of the process of filling in the matrix but also during the completion process. Numerical examples are also provided. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

MSC Class: 68W30

Journal ref: Mathematical and Computer Modelling, v.54(1-2),789-793, 2011

A Monte Carlo Study of Pairwise Comparisons

Authors: M. W. Herman, W. W. Koczkodaj

Abstract: Consistent approximations obtained by geometric means ($GM$) and the principal eigenvector ($EV$), turned out to be close enough for 1,000,000 not-so-inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrices. In this respect both methods are accurate enough for most practical applications. As the enclosed Table 1 demonstrates, the biggest difference between average deviations of $GM$ and $EV$ solutions is 0.0001… ▽ More Consistent approximations obtained by geometric means ($GM$) and the principal eigenvector ($EV$), turned out to be close enough for 1,000,000 not-so-inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrices. In this respect both methods are accurate enough for most practical applications. As the enclosed Table 1 demonstrates, the biggest difference between average deviations of $GM$ and $EV$ solutions is 0.00019 for the Euclidean metric and 0.00355 for the Tchebychev metric. For practical applications, this precision is far better than expected. After all we are talking, in most cases, about relative subjective comparisons and one tenth of a percent is usually below our threshold of perception. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Journal ref: Information Processing Letters 57 (1996) 25-29

How to reduce the number of rating scale items without predictability loss?

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, T. Kakiashvili, A. Szymańska, J. Montero-Marin, R. Araya, J. Garcia-Campayo, K. Rutkowski, D. Strzałka

Abstract: Rating scales are used to elicit data about qualitative entities (e.g., research collaboration). This study presents an innovative method for reducing the number of rating scale items without the predictability loss. The "area under the receiver operator curve method" (AUC ROC) is used. The presented method has reduced the number of rating scale items (variables) to 28.57\% (from 21 to 6) making o… ▽ More Rating scales are used to elicit data about qualitative entities (e.g., research collaboration). This study presents an innovative method for reducing the number of rating scale items without the predictability loss. The "area under the receiver operator curve method" (AUC ROC) is used. The presented method has reduced the number of rating scale items (variables) to 28.57\% (from 21 to 6) making over 70\% of collected data unnecessary. Results have been verified by two methods of analysis: Graded Response Model (GRM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). GRM revealed that the new method differentiates observations of high and middle scores. CFA proved that the reliability of the rating scale has not deteriorated by the scale item reduction. Both statistical analysis evidenced usefulness of the AUC ROC reduction method. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2017; v1 submitted 7 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures

MSC Class: 94A50; 62C25; 62C99; 62P10

On the Convergence of the Pairwise Comparisons Inconsistency Reduction Process

Authors: Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, Jacek Szybowski

Abstract: This study investigates a powerful model, targeted to subjective assessments, based on pairwise comparisons. It provides a proof that a distance-based inconsistency reduction transforms an inconsistent pairwise comparisons (PC) matrix into a consistent PC matrix which is generated by the geometric means of rows of a given inconsistent PC matrix. The distance-based inconsistency indicator was defin… ▽ More This study investigates a powerful model, targeted to subjective assessments, based on pairwise comparisons. It provides a proof that a distance-based inconsistency reduction transforms an inconsistent pairwise comparisons (PC) matrix into a consistent PC matrix which is generated by the geometric means of rows of a given inconsistent PC matrix. The distance-based inconsistency indicator was defined in 1993 for pairwise comparisons. Its convergence was analyzed in 1996 (regretfully, with an incomplete proof; finally completed in 2010). However, there was no clear interpretation of the convergence limit which is of considerable importance for applications and this study does so. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2015; v1 submitted 6 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: 16 page, 1 figure. For pairwise comparisons, the normalized vector o geometric means (GM) is equal to the normalized principal eigenvector (EV) for consistent matrices. For inconsistent matrices, the limit is "make it consistent" process is GM (specifically, not EV). This contribution finally concludes the discussion "GM or EV" originated in 1980s

Report number: 2015-05-05

Inconsistency indicator maps on groups for pairwise comparisons

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, J. Szybowski, E. Wajch

Abstract: This study presents an abelian group approach to analyzing inconsistency in pairwise comparisons. However, it wrongly assumes that an inconsistency indicator can take values in any abelian linearly ordered group. The followup publication (On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons, a collaboration which includes two of three authors of this publication) shows that any inc… ▽ More This study presents an abelian group approach to analyzing inconsistency in pairwise comparisons. However, it wrongly assumes that an inconsistency indicator can take values in any abelian linearly ordered group. The followup publication (On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons, a collaboration which includes two of three authors of this publication) shows that any inconsistency indicator should be normalized for a number of practical and theoretical reasons. The publication below fails to demonstrate even one example of a non trivial group (other than a group consisting of real numbers. However, some obtained results (under erroneous assumptions) are still valid. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2017; v1 submitted 21 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: This paper contains a serious error which was corrected in the followup publication: "On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons" posted as https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.07205

MSC Class: Primary: 06F15; 54E35; secondary: 00A69; 91E45

Pairwise Comparisons Simplified

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, J. Szybowski

Abstract: This study examines the notion of generators of a pairwise comparisons matrix. Such approach decreases the number of pairwise comparisons from $n\cdot (n-1)$ to $n-1$. An algorithm of reconstructing of the PC matrix from its set of generators is presented. This study examines the notion of generators of a pairwise comparisons matrix. Such approach decreases the number of pairwise comparisons from $n\cdot (n-1)$ to $n-1$. An algorithm of reconstructing of the PC matrix from its set of generators is presented. △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2013; originally announced November 2013.

Comments: 15 pages, two figures

MSC Class: 65F30 ACM Class: C.4; D.2.8; G.1.2; G.1.6; H.1.1; H.4.2

On Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisons

Authors: W. W. Koczkodaj, R. Szwarc

Abstract: We examine the notion of inconsistency in pairwise comparisons and propose an axiomatization which is independent of any method of approximation or the inconsistency indicator definition (e.g., Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP). It has been proven that the eigenvalue-based inconsistency (proposed as a part of AHP) is incorrect. We examine the notion of inconsistency in pairwise comparisons and propose an axiomatization which is independent of any method of approximation or the inconsistency indicator definition (e.g., Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP). It has been proven that the eigenvalue-based inconsistency (proposed as a part of AHP) is incorrect. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2013; v1 submitted 23 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.

Comments: Enhanced text, with 21 pages and 3 figures, proves that arbitrarily inaccurate pairwise matrices are considered acceptable by theories with a inconsistency based on the principal eigenvalue (e.g., AHP). CPC (corner pairwise comparisons) matrix is the crucial part of this study as it invalidates any eigenvalue-based inconsistency. All comments are highly appreciated

Report number: 2013-10-04 (jrn revised submission) MSC Class: 65F30 ACM Class: C.4; D.2.8; G.1.2; G.1.6; H.1.1; H.4.2

Journal ref: Fundamenta Informaticae, Volume 132, Number 4 / 2014, pages 485-500