-
MRI-based and metabolomics-based age scores act synergetically for mortality prediction shown by multi-cohort federated learning
Authors:
Pedro Mateus,
Swier Garst,
Jing Yu,
Davy Cats,
Alexander G. J. Harms,
Mahlet Birhanu,
Marian Beekman,
P. Eline Slagboom,
Marcel Reinders,
Jeroen van der Grond,
Andre Dekker,
Jacobus F. A. Jansen,
Magdalena Beran,
Miranda T. Schram,
Pieter Jelle Visser,
Justine Moonen,
Mohsen Ghanbari,
Gennady Roshchupkin,
Dina Vojinovic,
Inigo Bermejo,
Hailiang Mei,
Esther E. Bron
Abstract:
Biological age scores are an emerging tool to characterize aging by estimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers. Various scores have shown associations with aging-related outcomes. This study assessed the relation between an age score based on brain MRI images (BrainAge) and an age score based on metabolomic biomarkers (MetaboAge). We trained a federated deep learning model to e…
▽ More
Biological age scores are an emerging tool to characterize aging by estimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers. Various scores have shown associations with aging-related outcomes. This study assessed the relation between an age score based on brain MRI images (BrainAge) and an age score based on metabolomic biomarkers (MetaboAge). We trained a federated deep learning model to estimate BrainAge in three cohorts. The federated BrainAge model yielded significantly lower error for age prediction across the cohorts than locally trained models. Harmonizing the age interval between cohorts further improved BrainAge accuracy. Subsequently, we compared BrainAge with MetaboAge using federated association and survival analyses. The results showed a small association between BrainAge and MetaboAge as well as a higher predictive value for the time to mortality of both scores combined than for the individual scores. Hence, our study suggests that both aging scores capture different aspects of the aging process.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
A Deep Learning Approach Utilizing Covariance Matrix Analysis for the ISBI Edited MRS Reconstruction Challenge
Authors:
Julian P. Merkofer,
Dennis M. J. van de Sande,
Sina Amirrajab,
Gerhard S. Drenthen,
Mitko Veta,
Jacobus F. A. Jansen,
Marcel Breeuwer,
Ruud J. G. van Sloun
Abstract:
This work proposes a method to accelerate the acquisition of high-quality edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) scans using machine learning models taking the sample covariance matrix as input. The method is invariant to the number of transients and robust to noisy input data for both synthetic as well as in-vivo scenarios.
This work proposes a method to accelerate the acquisition of high-quality edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) scans using machine learning models taking the sample covariance matrix as input. The method is invariant to the number of transients and robust to noisy input data for both synthetic as well as in-vivo scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
A Review of Machine Learning Applications for the Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Workflow
Authors:
Dennis M. J. van de Sande,
Julian P. Merkofer,
Sina Amirrajab,
Mitko Veta,
Ruud J. G. van Sloun,
Maarten J. Versluis,
Jacobus F. A. Jansen,
Johan S. van den Brink,
Marcel Breeuwer
Abstract:
This literature review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning (ML) applications in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). As the use of ML techniques in MRS continues to grow, this review aims to provide the MRS community with a structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, we examine and summarize studies published between 2017 and 2023 from major journa…
▽ More
This literature review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning (ML) applications in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). As the use of ML techniques in MRS continues to grow, this review aims to provide the MRS community with a structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, we examine and summarize studies published between 2017 and 2023 from major journals in the magnetic resonance field. We categorize these studies based on a typical MRS workflow, including data acquisition, processing, analysis, and artificial data generation. Our review reveals that ML in MRS is still in its early stages, with a primary focus on processing and analysis techniques, and less attention given to data acquisition. We also found that many studies use similar model architectures, with little comparison to alternative architectures. Additionally, the generation of artificial data is a crucial topic, with no consistent method for its generation. Furthermore, many studies demonstrate that artificial data suffers from generalization issues when tested on in-vivo data. We also conclude that risks related to ML models should be addressed, particularly for clinical applications. Therefore, output uncertainty measures and model biases are critical to investigate. Nonetheless, the rapid development of ML in MRS and the promising results from the reviewed studies justify further research in this field.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
