Investigating Mercury's Environment with the Two-Spacecraft BepiColombo Mission
Authors:
A. Milillo,
M. Fujimoto,
G. Murakami,
J. Benkhoff,
J. Zender,
S. Aizawa,
M. Dósa,
L. Griton,
D. Heyner,
G. Ho,
S. M. Imber,
X. Jia,
T. Karlsson,
R. M. Killen,
M. Laurenza,
S. T. Lindsay,
S. McKenna-Lawlor,
A. Mura,
J. M. Raines,
D. A. Rothery,
N. André,
W. Baumjohann,
A. Berezhnoy,
P. -A. Bourdin,
E. J. Bunce
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The ESA-JAXA BepiColombo mission will provide simultaneous measurements from two spacecraft, offering an unprecedented opportunity to investigate magnetospheric and exospheric dynamics at Mercury as well as their interactions with the solar wind, radiation, and interplanetary dust. Many scientific instruments onboard the two spacecraft will be completely, or partially devoted to study the near-spa…
▽ More
The ESA-JAXA BepiColombo mission will provide simultaneous measurements from two spacecraft, offering an unprecedented opportunity to investigate magnetospheric and exospheric dynamics at Mercury as well as their interactions with the solar wind, radiation, and interplanetary dust. Many scientific instruments onboard the two spacecraft will be completely, or partially devoted to study the near-space environment of Mercury as well as the complex processes that govern it. Many issues remain unsolved even after the MESSENGER mission that ended in 2015. The specific orbits of the two spacecraft, MPO and Mio, and the comprehensive scientific payload allow a wider range of scientific questions to be addressed than those that could be achieved by the individual instruments acting alone, or by previous missions. These joint observations are of key importance because many phenomena in Mercury's environment are highly temporally and spatially variable. Examples of possible coordinated observations are described in this article, analysing the required geometrical conditions, pointing, resolutions and operation timing of different BepiColombo instruments sensors.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
What controls the local time extent of flux transfer events?
Authors:
S. E. Milan,
S. M. Imber,
J. A. Carter,
M. -T. Walach,
B. Hubert
Abstract:
Flux transfer events (FTEs) are the manifestation of bursty and/or patchy magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause. We compare two sequences of the ionospheric signatures of flux transfer events observed in global auroral imagery and coherent ionospheric radar measurements. Both sequences were observed during very similar seasonal and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions, though with di…
▽ More
Flux transfer events (FTEs) are the manifestation of bursty and/or patchy magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause. We compare two sequences of the ionospheric signatures of flux transfer events observed in global auroral imagery and coherent ionospheric radar measurements. Both sequences were observed during very similar seasonal and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions, though with differing solar wind speed. A key observation is that the signatures differed considerably in their local time extent. The two periods are 26 August 1998, when the IMF had components $\mathit{B}_{\mathit{z}}$ $\approx$ -10 nT and $\mathit{B}_{\mathit{y}}$ $\approx$ 9 nT and the solar wind speed was $\mathit{V}_{\mathit{x}}$ $\approx$ 650 km $s^{-1}$, and 31 August 2005, IMF $\mathit{B}_{\mathit{z}}$ $\approx$ -7 nT, $\mathit{B}_{\mathit{y}}$ $\approx$ 17 nT, and $\mathit{V}_{\mathit{x}}$ $\approx$ 380 km $s^{-1}$. In the first case, the reconnection rate was estimated to be near 160 kV, and the FTE signatures extended across at least 7 h of magnetic local time (MLT) of the dayside polar cap boundary. In the second, a reconnection rate close to 80 kV was estimated, and the FTEs had a MLT extent of roughly 2 h. We discuss the ramifications of these differences for solar wind-magnetosphere coupling.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
