-
Detailed Report on the Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (168 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference b…
▽ More
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference between the muon spin precession frequency and its cyclotron frequency. This difference is normalized to the strength of the magnetic field, measured using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The ratio is then corrected for small contributions from beam motion, beam dispersion, and transient magnetic fields. We measure $a_μ= 116 592 057 (25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). This is the world's most precise measurement of this quantity and represents a factor of $2.2$ improvement over our previous result based on the 2018 dataset. In combination, the two datasets yield $a_μ(\text{FNAL}) = 116 592 055 (24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). Combining this with the measurements from Brookhaven National Laboratory for both positive and negative muons, the new world average is $a_μ$(exp) $ = 116 592 059 (22) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm).
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
The Mu2e crystal and SiPM calorimeter: construction status
Authors:
Nikolay Atanov,
Vladimir Baranov,
Leo Borrel,
Caterina Bloise,
Julian Budagov,
Sergio Ceravol,
Franco Cervelli,
Francesco Colao,
Marco Cordelli,
Giovanni Corradi,
Yuri Davydov,
Stefano Di Falco,
Eleonora Diociaiuti,
Simone Donati,
Bertrand Echenard,
Carlo Ferrari,
Ruben Gargiulo,
Antonio Gioiosa,
Simona Giovannella,
Valerio Giusti,
Vladimir Glagolev,
Francesco Grancagnolo,
Dariush Hampai,
Fabio Happacher,
David Hitlin
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab searches for the neutrino-less conversion of a negative muon into an electron, with a distinctive signature of a mono-energetic electron with energy of 104.967 MeV. The calorimeter is made of two disks of pure CsI crystals, each read out by two custom large area UV-extended SiPMs. It plays a fundamental role in providing excellent particle identification capabilitie…
▽ More
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab searches for the neutrino-less conversion of a negative muon into an electron, with a distinctive signature of a mono-energetic electron with energy of 104.967 MeV. The calorimeter is made of two disks of pure CsI crystals, each read out by two custom large area UV-extended SiPMs. It plays a fundamental role in providing excellent particle identification capabilities and an online trigger filter while improving the track reconstruction, requiring better than 10% energy and 500 ps timing resolutions for 100 MeV electrons. In this paper, we present the status of construction and the Quality Control (QC) performed on the produced crystals and photosensors, the development of the rad-hard electronics, and the most important results of the irradiation tests. Construction of the mechanics is also reported. Status and plans for the calorimeter assembly and its first commissioning are described.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (166 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable…
▽ More
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, $\tildeω'^{}_p$, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, $ω_a$. From the ratio $ω_a / \tildeω'^{}_p$, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine $a_μ= 116\,592\,057(25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data, we obtain $a_μ\text{(FNAL)} = 116\,592\,055(24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). The new experimental world average is $a_μ(\text{Exp}) = 116\,592\,059(22)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm), which represents a factor of 2 improvement in precision.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2023; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
An automated QC Station for the Calibration of the Mu2e Calorimeter Readout Units
Authors:
E. Sanzani,
C. Bloise,
S. Ceravolo,
F. Cervelli,
F. Colao,
M. Cordelli,
G. Corradi,
S. Di Falco,
E. Diociaiuti,
S. Donati,
C. Ferrari,
R. Gargiulo,
A. Gioiosa,
S. Giovannella,
V. Giusti,
D. Hampai,
F. Happacher,
M. Martini,
S. Miscetti,
L. Morescalchi,
D. Paesani,
D. Pasciuto,
E. Pedreschi,
F. Raffaelli,
I. Sarra
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Mu2e calorimeter will employ Readout Units, each made of two Silicon Photomultipliers arrays and two Front End Electronics boards. To calibrate them, we have designed, assembled and put in operation an automated Quality Control (QC) station. Gain, collected charge and photon detection efficiency are evaluated for each unit. In this paper, the QC Station is presented, in its hardware and softwa…
▽ More
The Mu2e calorimeter will employ Readout Units, each made of two Silicon Photomultipliers arrays and two Front End Electronics boards. To calibrate them, we have designed, assembled and put in operation an automated Quality Control (QC) station. Gain, collected charge and photon detection efficiency are evaluated for each unit. In this paper, the QC Station is presented, in its hardware and software aspects, summarizing also the tests performed on the ROUs and the first measurement results.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm
Authors:
B. Abi,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
L. P. Alonzi,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
F. Azfar,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
A. Behnke,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
R. Bjorkquist,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico
, et al. (212 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in…
▽ More
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ${\tildeω'^{}_p}$ in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^{\circ}$C. The ratio $ω_a / {\tildeω'^{}_p}$, together with known fundamental constants, determines $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.46\,ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both $μ^+$ and $μ^-$, the new experimental average of $a_μ({\rm Exp}) = 116\,592\,061(41)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.35\,ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Measurement of the anomalous precession frequency of the muon in the Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain
, et al. (153 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run in 2018. When combined with a precision measurement of the magnetic field of the experiment's muo…
▽ More
The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run in 2018. When combined with a precision measurement of the magnetic field of the experiment's muon storage ring, the precession frequency measurement determines a muon magnetic anomaly of $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.46 ppm). This article describes the multiple techniques employed in the reconstruction, analysis and fitting of the data to measure the precession frequency. It also presents the averaging of the results from the eleven separate determinations of ω_a, and the systematic uncertainties on the result.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Beam dynamics corrections to the Run-1 measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (152 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is fe…
▽ More
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is felt by relativistic muons passing transversely through the radial electric field components created by the ESQ system. The correction depends on the stored momentum distribution and the tunes of the ring, which has relatively weak vertical focusing. Vertical betatron motions imply that the muons do not orbit the ring in a plane exactly orthogonal to the vertical magnetic field direction. A correction is necessary to account for an average pitch angle associated with their trajectories. A third small correction is necessary because muons that escape the ring during the storage time are slightly biased in initial spin phase compared to the parent distribution. Finally, because two high-voltage resistors in the ESQ network had longer than designed RC time constants, the vertical and horizontal centroids and envelopes of the stored muon beam drifted slightly, but coherently, during each storage ring fill. This led to the discovery of an important phase-acceptance relationship that requires a correction. The sum of the corrections to $ω_a^m$ is 0.50 $\pm$ 0.09 ppm; the uncertainty is small compared to the 0.43 ppm statistical precision of $ω_a^m$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Magnetic Field Measurement and Analysis for the Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (148 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_μ= (g^{}_μ-2)/2$ of the muon to a combined precision of 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents the measurement of the magnetic field in the muon storage ring. The magnetic field is monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance systems and calibrat…
▽ More
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_μ= (g^{}_μ-2)/2$ of the muon to a combined precision of 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents the measurement of the magnetic field in the muon storage ring. The magnetic field is monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance systems and calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^\circ$C. The measured field is weighted by the muon distribution resulting in $\tildeω'^{}_p$, the denominator in the ratio $ω^{}_a$/$\tildeω'^{}_p$ that together with known fundamental constants yields $a^{}_μ$. The reported uncertainty on $\tildeω'^{}_p$ for the Run-1 data set is 114 ppb consisting of uncertainty contributions from frequency extraction, calibration, mapping, tracking, and averaging of 56 ppb, and contributions from fast transient fields of 99 ppb.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
The laser-based gain monitoring system of the calorimeters in the Muon $g-2$ experiment at Fermilab
Authors:
A. Anastasi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
A. Boiano,
E. Bottalico,
G. Cantatore,
D. Cauz,
A. T. Chapelain,
G. Corradi,
S. Dabagov,
S. Di Falco,
P. Di Meo,
G. Di Sciascio,
R. Di Stefano,
S. Donati,
A. Driutti,
C. Ferrari,
A. T. Fienberg,
A. Fioretti,
C. Gabbanini,
L. K. Gibbons,
A. Gioiosa,
P. Girotti,
D. Hampai,
J. B. Hempstead
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon $g-2$ experiment, E989, is currently taking data at Fermilab with the aim of reducing the experimental error on the muon anomaly by a factor of four and possibly clarifying the current discrepancy with the theoretical prediction. A central component of this four-fold improvement in precision is the laser calibration system of the calorimeters, which has to monitor the gain variations of t…
▽ More
The Muon $g-2$ experiment, E989, is currently taking data at Fermilab with the aim of reducing the experimental error on the muon anomaly by a factor of four and possibly clarifying the current discrepancy with the theoretical prediction. A central component of this four-fold improvement in precision is the laser calibration system of the calorimeters, which has to monitor the gain variations of the photo-sensors with a 0.04\% precision on the short-term ($\sim 1\,$ms). This is about one order of magnitude better than what has ever been achieved for the calibration of a particle physics calorimeter. The system is designed to monitor also long-term gain variations, mostly due to temperature effects, with a precision below the per mille level. This article reviews the design, the implementation and the performance of the Muon $g-2$ laser calibration system, showing how the experimental requirements have been met.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2019; v1 submitted 19 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Electron beam test of key elements of the laser-based calibration system for the muon $g$ $-$ $2$ experiment
Authors:
A. Anastasi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Bartolini,
G. Cantatore,
D. Cauz,
G. Corradi,
S. Dabagov,
G. DI Sciascio,
R. Di Stefano,
A. Driutti,
O. Escalante,
C. Ferrari,
A. T. Fienberg,
A. Fioretti,
C. Gabbanini,
A. Gioiosa,
D. Hampai,
D. W. Hertzog,
M. Iacovacci,
M. Karuza,
J. Kaspar,
A. Liedl,
A. Lusiani,
F. Marignetti
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the test of many of the key elements of the laser-based calibration system for muon g - 2 experiment E989 at Fermilab. The test was performed at the Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati's Beam Test Facility using a 450 MeV electron beam impinging on a small subset of the final g - 2 lead-fluoride crystal calorimeter system. The calibration system was configured as planned for the E989 experi…
▽ More
We report the test of many of the key elements of the laser-based calibration system for muon g - 2 experiment E989 at Fermilab. The test was performed at the Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati's Beam Test Facility using a 450 MeV electron beam impinging on a small subset of the final g - 2 lead-fluoride crystal calorimeter system. The calibration system was configured as planned for the E989 experiment and uses the same type of laser and most of the final optical elements. We show results regarding the calorimeter's response calibration, the maximum equivalent electron energy which can be provided by the laser and the stability of the calibration system components.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Test of candidate light distributors for the muon (g$-$2) laser calibration system
Authors:
A. Anastasi,
D. Babusci,
F. Baffigi,
G. Cantatore,
D. Cauz,
G. Corradi,
S. Dabagov,
G. Di Sciascio,
R. Di Stefano,
C. Ferrari,
A. T. Fienberg,
A. Fioretti,
L. Fulgentini,
C. Gabbanini,
L. A. Gizzi,
D. Hampai,
D. W. Hertzog,
M. Iacovacci,
M. Karuza,
J. Kaspar,
P. Koester,
L. Labate,
S. Mastroianni,
D. Moricciani,
G. Pauletta
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The new muon (g-2) experiment E989 at Fermilab will be equipped with a laser calibration system for all the 1296 channels of the calorimeters. An integrating sphere and an alternative system based on an engineered diffuser have been considered as possible light distributors for the experiment. We present here a detailed comparison of the two based on temporal response, spatial uniformity, transmit…
▽ More
The new muon (g-2) experiment E989 at Fermilab will be equipped with a laser calibration system for all the 1296 channels of the calorimeters. An integrating sphere and an alternative system based on an engineered diffuser have been considered as possible light distributors for the experiment. We present here a detailed comparison of the two based on temporal response, spatial uniformity, transmittance and time stability.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Muon (g-2) Technical Design Report
Authors:
J. Grange,
V. Guarino,
P. Winter,
K. Wood,
H. Zhao,
R. M. Carey,
D. Gastler,
E. Hazen,
N. Kinnaird,
J. P. Miller,
J. Mott,
B. L. Roberts,
J. Benante,
J. Crnkovic,
W. M. Morse,
H. Sayed,
V. Tishchenko,
V. P. Druzhinin,
B. I. Khazin,
I. A. Koop,
I. Logashenko,
Y. M. Shatunov,
E. Solodov,
M. Korostelev,
D. Newton
, et al. (176 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon (g-2) Experiment, E989 at Fermilab, will measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment a factor-of-four more precisely than was done in E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. The E821 result appears to be greater than the Standard-Model prediction by more than three standard deviations. When combined with expected improvement in the Standard-Model hadronic contributions, E989 should…
▽ More
The Muon (g-2) Experiment, E989 at Fermilab, will measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment a factor-of-four more precisely than was done in E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. The E821 result appears to be greater than the Standard-Model prediction by more than three standard deviations. When combined with expected improvement in the Standard-Model hadronic contributions, E989 should be able to determine definitively whether or not the E821 result is evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model. After a review of the physics motivation and the basic technique, which will use the muon storage ring built at BNL and now relocated to Fermilab, the design of the new experiment is presented. This document was created in partial fulfillment of the requirements necessary to obtain DOE CD-2/3 approval.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2018; v1 submitted 27 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
Study of the single cluster response of a helium-isobutane drift chamber prototype using 8 keV X-rays
Authors:
G. Cavoto,
S. Dabagov,
D. Hampai,
G. Piredda,
F. Renga,
E. Ripiccini,
C. Voena
Abstract:
The identification of single clusters in the electronic signals produced by ionizing particles within a drift chamber is expected to significantly improve the performances of this kind of detectors in terms of particle identification capabilities and space resolution. In order to develop refined cluster recognition algorithms, it is essential to measure the response of the chamber and its electron…
▽ More
The identification of single clusters in the electronic signals produced by ionizing particles within a drift chamber is expected to significantly improve the performances of this kind of detectors in terms of particle identification capabilities and space resolution. In order to develop refined cluster recognition algorithms, it is essential to measure the response of the chamber and its electronics to single ionization clusters. This can be done by irradiating the chamber with X-rays. We report here on the studies performed on a drift chamber prototype for the MEG-II experiment at the X-ray facility of the INFN Frascati's National Laboratories "XLab Frascati". The prototype is operated with a helium-isobutane mixture and instrumented with high bandwidth custom pre-amplifiers. The results of this study have been used to develop an innovative method for cluster recognition, based on the Wiener filter technique. As a side measurement, we also performed a study of the gas gain in a configuration which is similar to that of the MEG-II experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
-
X-ray propagation through hollow channel: PolyCAD - a ray tracing code (1)
Authors:
D. Hampai,
S. B. Dabagov,
G. Cappuccio,
G. Cibin
Abstract:
A new CAD program, PolyCAD, designed for X-ray photon tracing in polycapillary optics is described. To understand the PolyCAD code and its results, the theoretical basis of X-ray transmission by a single cylindrical channel (monocapillary) is discussed first. Then the simplest cases of cylindrically and conically shaped polycapillary optics are examined. PolyCAD allows any type of X-ray source t…
▽ More
A new CAD program, PolyCAD, designed for X-ray photon tracing in polycapillary optics is described. To understand the PolyCAD code and its results, the theoretical basis of X-ray transmission by a single cylindrical channel (monocapillary) is discussed first. Then the simplest cases of cylindrically and conically shaped polycapillary optics are examined. PolyCAD allows any type of X-ray source to be used: an X-ray tube of finite beam dimensions or an astrophysical object can be simulated in combination with the polycapillary optics. The radiation distribution images formed on a screen located at various focal distances are discussed. The good agreement of some of the PolyCAD results with those reported in earlier papers validate the code. This is the first paper of a series dedicated to the development of an exhaustive CAD program, work is in progress to develop the code to include other polycapillary-optics shapes, such as semi-lenses and full-lenses.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2005;
originally announced February 2005.
