-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in harmonic space
Authors:
L. Faga,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
R. Rosenfeld,
M. Lima,
C. Doux,
X. Fang,
J. Prat,
A. Porredon,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind
, et al. (78 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the joint tomographic analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering in harmonic space, using galaxy catalogues from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). We utilise the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues as lens galaxies and the METACALIBRATION catalogue as source galaxies. The measurements of angular power spectra are performed using the pseudo…
▽ More
We present the joint tomographic analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering in harmonic space, using galaxy catalogues from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). We utilise the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues as lens galaxies and the METACALIBRATION catalogue as source galaxies. The measurements of angular power spectra are performed using the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method, and our theoretical modelling follows the fiducial analyses performed by DES Y3 in configuration space, accounting for galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, magnification bias, shear magnification bias and photometric redshift uncertainties. We explore different approaches for scale cuts based on non-linear galaxy bias and baryonic effects contamination. Our fiducial covariance matrix is computed analytically, accounting for mask geometry in the Gaussian term, and including non-Gaussian contributions and super-sample covariance terms. To validate our harmonic space pipelines and covariance matrix, we used a suite of 1800 log-normal simulations. We also perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of our harmonic space analysis. In the $Λ$CDM model, the clustering amplitude $S_8 =σ_8(Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ is constrained to $S_8 = 0.704\pm 0.029$ and $S_8 = 0.753\pm 0.024$ ($68\%$ C.L.) for the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues, respectively. For the $w$CDM, the dark energy equation of state is constrained to $w = -1.28 \pm 0.29$ and $w = -1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$, for redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues, respectively. These results are compatible with the corresponding DES Y3 results in configuration space and pave the way for harmonic space analyses using the DES Y6 data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Cosmic Shear in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Configuration Space Results
Authors:
H. Camacho,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
A. Troja,
R. Rosenfeld,
L. Faga,
R. Gomes,
C. Doux,
X. Fang,
M. Lima,
V. Miranda,
T. F. Eifler,
O. Friedrich,
M. Gatti,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
E. Gaztanaga,
D. Gruen,
W. G. Hartley,
B. Hoyle,
M. Jarvis,
N. MacCrann
, et al. (74 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties…
▽ More
We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties as well as intrinsic alignments. We adopt as fiducial covariance matrix an analytical computation accounting for the mask geometry in the Gaussian term, including non-Gaussian contributions. A suite of 1200 lognormal simulations is used to validate the harmonic space pipeline and the covariance matrix. We perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of the harmonic space analysis. Finally, we use the DES-Y1 pipeline in configuration space to perform a similar likelihood analysis and compare both results, demonstrating their compatibility in estimating the cosmological parameters $S_8$, $σ_8$ and $Ω_m$. The methods implemented and validated in this paper will allow us to perform a consistent harmonic space analysis in the upcoming DES data.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2022; v1 submitted 13 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Galaxy Clustering in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Real-Space Results
Authors:
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
L. Faga,
R. Gomes,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. Troja,
O. Alves,
C. Doux,
J. Elvin-Poole,
X. Fang,
N. Kokron,
M. Lima,
V. Miranda,
S. Pandey,
A. Porredon,
J. Sanchez,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We perform an analysis in harmonic space of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data (DES-Y1) galaxy clustering data using products obtained for the real-space analysis. We test our pipeline with a suite of lognormal simulations, which are used to validate scale cuts in harmonic space as well as to provide a covariance matrix that takes into account the DES-Y1 mask. We then apply this pipeline to DES-Y1…
▽ More
We perform an analysis in harmonic space of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data (DES-Y1) galaxy clustering data using products obtained for the real-space analysis. We test our pipeline with a suite of lognormal simulations, which are used to validate scale cuts in harmonic space as well as to provide a covariance matrix that takes into account the DES-Y1 mask. We then apply this pipeline to DES-Y1 data taking into account survey property maps derived for the real-space analysis. We compare with real-space DES-Y1 results obtained from a similar pipeline. We show that the harmonic space analysis we develop yields results that are compatible with the real-space analysis for the bias parameters. This verification paves the way to performing a harmonic space analysis for the upcoming DES-Y3 data.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2021; v1 submitted 25 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.