-
Weak field and slow motion limits in energy-momentum powered gravity
Authors:
Ozgur Akarsu,
A. Kazim Camlibel,
Nihan Katirci,
Ibrahim Semiz,
N. Merve Uzun
Abstract:
We explore the weak field and slow motion limits, Newtonian and Post-Newtonian limits, of the energy-momentum powered gravity (EMPG), viz., the energy-momentum squared gravity (EMSG) of the form $f(T_{μν}T^{μν})=α(T_{μν}T^{μν})^η$ with $α$ and $η$ being constants. We have shown that EMPG with $η\geq0$ and general relativity (GR) are not distinguishable by local tests, say, the Solar System tests;…
▽ More
We explore the weak field and slow motion limits, Newtonian and Post-Newtonian limits, of the energy-momentum powered gravity (EMPG), viz., the energy-momentum squared gravity (EMSG) of the form $f(T_{μν}T^{μν})=α(T_{μν}T^{μν})^η$ with $α$ and $η$ being constants. We have shown that EMPG with $η\geq0$ and general relativity (GR) are not distinguishable by local tests, say, the Solar System tests; as they lead to the same gravitational potential form, PPN parameters, and geodesics for the test particles. However, within the EMPG framework, $M_{\rm ast}$, the mass of an astrophysical object inferred from astronomical observations such as planetary orbits and deflection of light, corresponds to the effective mass $M_{\rm eff}(α,η,M)=M+M_{\rm empg}(α,η,M)$, $M$ being the actual physical mass and $M_{\rm empg}$ being the modification due to EMPG. Accordingly, while in GR we simply have the relation $M_{\rm ast}=M$, in EMPG we have $M_{\rm ast}=M+M_{\rm empg}$. Within the framework of EMPG, if there is information about the values of $\{α,η\}$ pair or $M$ from other independent phenomena (from cosmological observations, structure of the astrophysical object, etc.), then in principle it is possible to infer not only $M_{\rm ast}$ alone from astronomical observations, but $M$ and $M_{\rm empg}$ separately. For a proper analysis within EMPG framework, it is necessary to describe the slow motion condition (also related to the Newtonian limit approximation) by $|p_{\rm eff}/ρ_{\rm eff}|\ll1$ (where $p_{\rm eff}=p+p_{\rm empg}$ and $ρ_{\rm eff}=ρ+ρ_{\rm empg}$), whereas this condition leads to $|p/ρ|\ll1$ in GR.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2023; v1 submitted 10 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Pantheon update on a model-independent analysis of cosmological supernova data
Authors:
A. K. Çamlıbel,
İ. Semiz,
M. A. Feyizoğlu
Abstract:
We present an update of our previous work, necessitated by availability of a significantly improved dataset. The work is a model-independent analysis of the cosmological supernova (Type Ia) data, where function families are fit to the data in form of luminosity distance as function of redshift, that is, $d_{L}(z)$; and subsequently time-derivatives of the scale function $a(t)$ are $analytically$ d…
▽ More
We present an update of our previous work, necessitated by availability of a significantly improved dataset. The work is a model-independent analysis of the cosmological supernova (Type Ia) data, where function families are fit to the data in form of luminosity distance as function of redshift, that is, $d_{L}(z)$; and subsequently time-derivatives of the scale function $a(t)$ are $analytically$ derived, but as functions of $z$, without making assumptions about of gravity or the contents of the universe. This gives, e.g. the redshift value at which the universe goes over from deceleration to acceleration, as $z_{t}=0.54 \pm 0.04$ for a flat universe. In the update, we switch to a more modern fit criterion and also take into account the uncertainty in the calibration of the SNIa luminosities.
If a theory of gravity $is$ assumed, our results allow determination of the density of the universe as function of $z$, from which conclusions about the contents of the universe can be drawn. We update the previous work's result where this was done for Einstein gravity, finding a lower-limit on the dark energy fraction, $Ω_{DE}>0.46$; and here we do this also for Starobinsky gravity, where we can find a Starobinsky parameter that can eliminate the need for dark energy.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Cosmic acceleration driven by dark matter self-interactions
Authors:
A. Kazım Çamlıbel
Abstract:
We explore a Gedanken-model for cosmic evolution, where dark matter is strongly self-interacting and stays in a plasma state until late stages. After decoupling, it condensates to super-structures with cosmic voids similar to the current picture of the universe. With the help of the equation of state of dry foam (equivalently a fluid with voids in it) from fluid mechanics, it is possible to show t…
▽ More
We explore a Gedanken-model for cosmic evolution, where dark matter is strongly self-interacting and stays in a plasma state until late stages. After decoupling, it condensates to super-structures with cosmic voids similar to the current picture of the universe. With the help of the equation of state of dry foam (equivalently a fluid with voids in it) from fluid mechanics, it is possible to show that tension within these cosmic walls due to their binding interaction may cause an accelerated expansion in the absence of dark energy. Furthermore, we give a cosmological analysis of this scenario with a semi-phenomenological ansatz, where we use recent Type Ia supernova compilation.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2020; v1 submitted 3 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
What do the cosmological supernova data really tell us?
Authors:
İbrahim Semiz,
A. Kazım Çamlıbel
Abstract:
Not much by themselves, aparently.
We try to reconstruct the scale factor $a(t)$ of the universe from the SNe Ia data, i.e. the luminosity distance $d_{L}(z)$, using only the cosmological principle and the assumption that gravitation is governed by a metric theory. In our hence "model-independent," or "cosmographic" study, we fit functions to $d_{L}(z)$ rather than $a(t)$, since $d_{L}(z)$ is wh…
▽ More
Not much by themselves, aparently.
We try to reconstruct the scale factor $a(t)$ of the universe from the SNe Ia data, i.e. the luminosity distance $d_{L}(z)$, using only the cosmological principle and the assumption that gravitation is governed by a metric theory. In our hence "model-independent," or "cosmographic" study, we fit functions to $d_{L}(z)$ rather than $a(t)$, since $d_{L}(z)$ is what is measured. We find that the acceleration history of the universe cannot be reliably determined in this approach due to the irregularity and parametrization-dependence of the results.
However, adding the GRB data to the dataset cures most of the irregularities, at the cost of compromising the model-independent nature of the study slightly. Then we can determine the redshift of transition to cosmic acceleration as $z_{\rm t} \sim 0.50 \pm 0.09$ for a flat universe (larger for positive spatial curvature).
If Einstein gravity (GR) is assumed, we find a redshift at which the density of the universe predicted from the $d_{L}(z)$ data is independent of curvature. We use this point to derive an upper limit on matter density, hence a lower limit on the density of dark energy. While these limits do not improve the generally accepted ones, they are derived *only using the $d_{L}(z)$ data*.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
Jovian planets as co-detectors of gravitational waves
Authors:
İbrahim Semiz,
A. Kazım Çamlıbel
Abstract:
Acoustic oscillations in stars can be driven by gravitational waves. However, at present it is not feasible to use the helioseismology data for their detection, since it is impossible to disentangle the uncertain driving contributions originating in the Sun itself.
We here point out that any such wave will affect also Jupiter and Saturn in a similar $and$ $coordinated$ $way$; after all, they are…
▽ More
Acoustic oscillations in stars can be driven by gravitational waves. However, at present it is not feasible to use the helioseismology data for their detection, since it is impossible to disentangle the uncertain driving contributions originating in the Sun itself.
We here point out that any such wave will affect also Jupiter and Saturn in a similar $and$ $coordinated$ $way$; after all, they are mostly spheres of gas like the Sun, only one order of magnitude smaller. Hence, akin to the concept of coincidence detection in particle physics experiments, evaluation of the time-correlation function of the measured acoustic velocities of the same mode of oscillation of any two of these three objects will eliminate the (independent) internal effects; and observation of a peak in that correlation function will be tantamount to detection of a gravitational wave. There is a (slight) possibility that such detection has already occured.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
