brainlife.io: A decentralized and open source cloud platform to support neuroscience research
Authors:
Soichi Hayashi,
Bradley A. Caron,
Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld,
Sophia Vinci-Booher,
Brent McPherson,
Daniel N. Bullock,
Giulia Bertò,
Guiomar Niso,
Sandra Hanekamp,
Daniel Levitas,
Kimberly Ray,
Anne MacKenzie,
Lindsey Kitchell,
Josiah K. Leong,
Filipi Nascimento-Silva,
Serge Koudoro,
Hanna Willis,
Jasleen K. Jolly,
Derek Pisner,
Taylor R. Zuidema,
Jan W. Kurzawski,
Kyriaki Mikellidou,
Aurore Bussalb,
Christopher Rorden,
Conner Victory
, et al. (39 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuroscience research has expanded dramatically over the past 30 years by advancing standardization and tool development to support rigor and transparency. Consequently, the complexity of the data pipeline has also increased, hindering access to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperabile, and Reusable) data analysis to portions of the worldwide research community. brainlife.io was developed to red…
▽ More
Neuroscience research has expanded dramatically over the past 30 years by advancing standardization and tool development to support rigor and transparency. Consequently, the complexity of the data pipeline has also increased, hindering access to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperabile, and Reusable) data analysis to portions of the worldwide research community. brainlife.io was developed to reduce these burdens and democratize modern neuroscience research across institutions and career levels. Using community software and hardware infrastructure, the platform provides open-source data standardization, management, visualization, and processing and simplifies the data pipeline. brainlife.io automatically tracks the provenance history of thousands of data objects, supporting simplicity, efficiency, and transparency in neuroscience research. Here brainlife.io's technology and data services are described and evaluated for validity, reliability, reproducibility, replicability, and scientific utility. Using data from 4 modalities and 3,200 participants, we demonstrate that brainlife.io's services produce outputs that adhere to best practices in modern neuroscience research.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Anatomically-Informed Multiple Linear Assignment Problems for White Matter Bundle Segmentation
Authors:
Giulia Bertò,
Paolo Avesani,
Franco Pestilli,
Daniel Bullock,
Bradley Caron,
Emanuele Olivetti
Abstract:
Segmenting white matter bundles from human tractograms is a task of interest for several applications. Current methods for bundle segmentation consider either only prior knowledge about the relative anatomical position of a bundle, or only its geometrical properties. Our aim is to improve the results of segmentation by proposing a method that takes into account information about both the underlyin…
▽ More
Segmenting white matter bundles from human tractograms is a task of interest for several applications. Current methods for bundle segmentation consider either only prior knowledge about the relative anatomical position of a bundle, or only its geometrical properties. Our aim is to improve the results of segmentation by proposing a method that takes into account information about both the underlying anatomy and the geometry of bundles at the same time. To achieve this goal, we extend a state-of-the-art example-based method based on the Linear Assignment Problem (LAP) by including prior anatomical information within the optimization process. The proposed method shows a significant improvement with respect to the original method, in particular on small bundles.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
Comparison of Distances for Supervised Segmentation of White Matter Tractography
Authors:
Emanuele Olivetti,
Giulia Bertò,
Pietro Gori,
Nusrat Sharmin,
Paolo Avesani
Abstract:
Tractograms are mathematical representations of the main paths of axons within the white matter of the brain, from diffusion MRI data. Such representations are in the form of polylines, called streamlines, and one streamline approximates the common path of tens of thousands of axons. The analysis of tractograms is a task of interest in multiple fields, like neurosurgery and neurology. A basic buil…
▽ More
Tractograms are mathematical representations of the main paths of axons within the white matter of the brain, from diffusion MRI data. Such representations are in the form of polylines, called streamlines, and one streamline approximates the common path of tens of thousands of axons. The analysis of tractograms is a task of interest in multiple fields, like neurosurgery and neurology. A basic building block of many pipelines of analysis is the definition of a distance function between streamlines. Multiple distance functions have been proposed in the literature, and different authors use different distances, usually without a specific reason other than invoking the "common practice". To this end, in this work we want to test such common practices, in order to obtain factual reasons for choosing one distance over another. For these reasons, in this work we compare many streamline distance functions available in the literature. We focus on the common task of automatic bundle segmentation and we adopt the recent approach of supervised segmentation from expert-based examples. Using the HCP dataset, we compare several distances obtaining guidelines on the choice of which distance function one should use for supervised bundle segmentation.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
