Jump to content

Talk:Curtiss F11C Goshawk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:F11C Goshawk)

Image deletion as of 8th August

[edit]

The image Image:XBFC-1.jpg has been deleted per category for speedy deletion, criteria I4. The image may be freely uploaded again if a source and correct copyright tag are given, and a fair use rationale (if appropriate). KiloT 18:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving of articles

[edit]

I moved to some articles between pages of F11C and BF2C, so they are more concentrating to each model now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shodan99 (talkcontribs) 09:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why having separate articles for F11C and BF2C?

[edit]

Dear Wikipedians, I'm confused... if the BF2C Goshawk is merely a more advanced version of the F11C Goshawk, why have 2 different wikiarticles? Shouldn't they be merged into this one? IMHO, it's like having different articles for the Bf 109 A to E and then F to K versions. Regards, DPdH (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Curtiss F11C Goshawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]