User talk:069952497a

You had asked me if I needed help. Thanks for all the help thus far. Now the page Pearce Robinson was put up for speedy deletion. I had a talk with the administrator and he said he will give me two days before he deletes. Could you help me address all the problems, since you've helped me already get the page to the good article criteria. I want to make sure that everyone is done to satisfy all needs. Capture2015 (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I am unable to help. The article itself is of good quality; the writing is fine. But the issue with your article is not that it is not written well, it is that the notability of the subject of the article, being Pearce Robinson, is not enough for him to merit an article on Wikipedia. Sorry to be blunt, but no matter how well the article is written, if there are no reliable, third party sources that go into the subject of the article in detail, then it cannot be included on Wikipedia. And so far, I have not been able to find any said sources. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 19:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked through the some of the sources yourself. I would contest that they do. Capture2015 (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Am I allowed to add the television station interview with Pearce Robinson from one of the most viewed television stations in Trinidad, CNC3 Television. It is in parts and is yet another example of notability. I haven't added it as a citation yet, just asking if I can do that. It is from cnc3 http://www.cnc3.co.tt/news/cnc3-ems-2013-05-14-transforming-youth-pt1. The interview in totality is 30 mins. Capture2015 (talk) 20:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see from 4:11 introduction to Discussion about Pearce Robinson, PNM Abroad and Scarlet41. The rest of the 30 minute interview can be seen at 1:30:00 onwards. This interview was done by CCN TV6 Express House and conducted by host Fazeer Mohammed. Please see the interview attached: http://www.tv6tnt.com/other-news/MORNING-EDITION-6TH-MAY-2013-206420251.html Capture2015 (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I saw you recently added that the mascot for Berczy is named "Wilber the Bear". I changed it back to just Berczy Bears, because I couldn't find a source to confirm this. So... I was wondering where you got the name from? Brambleclawx 23:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this counts as original research, but I go to the school, and that's what they changed it to this year. 069952497a (talk) 13:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They didn't have that name when I went there... is it "Wilber" or "Wilbur"? Brambleclawx 04:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wilber, as in WILliam BERczy.069952497a (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've left a message for you on the Talk page of the article you moved today to William Leveson (mercer). Best, NinaGreen (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a note at the Wikipedia Help desk. The deletion proposed on the article's Talk page sounds drastic. NinaGreen (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are very proud of our superintendent Dr. Adolf Hitler. I find it insane that you would undo the change I made. The wrangler of unicorns was our school mascot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.84.211 (talk) 15:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making joke edits. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 15:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.215.68.164 (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Jay Glazer is a client of ours and we need to update his bio page. I really do not have time or energy to read through all of the guidelines. Can you please advise on the best way to make changes? Thank you. JoshRosenthal2300 (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Josh Rosenthal 5/22/13[reply]

My reply here. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 20:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, he does not pay us to fix his page. OK, understood regarding the biases. Thanks for your help.JoshRosenthal2300 (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me what you mean by "client", then? 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 21:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did that change because I think it is useful to know that the links near root are so-called "fat" links but they are actually multiple links. Perhaps instead of just fat word, "fat" (i.e. in quotes) may be useful? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Methosoldest (talk • contribs) 00:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it really is a technical term, then I suppose that's my mistake. The usage of the term should be explained in the article and backed up with references. The quotes are a good idea as well. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 13:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mistake when you write that in brezovica is old ruins.Gradiste is in Štrpce not in brezovica.Brezovica was built in mid 70ths — Preceding unsigned comment added by King911 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what article is this? 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 13:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This post is about Brezovica. — Preceding unsigned comment added by King911 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit as vandalism because you removed information which was referenced. I believe the references do point to the existence of old ruins, which are clearly identified in the article as being part of Štrpce. As Brezovica is also part of Štrpce, I think the history section is still relevant to the article. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 23:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you from and do you know these things — Preceding unsigned comment added by King911 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am from Canada and have no personal knowledge of Brezovica. However, I and the potential readers of the article cannot assume that you have legitimate knowledge of the area. One of the keys of Wikipedia is that any information in its articles must be verifiable, not just true. I am prepared to accept that the references are legitimate and relevant to the article (since I do not speak Serbian/Russian).

I am also not very clear on what exactly your concern is; thus I have probably not addressed your actual issue in my reply. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 23:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My friend i am from Strpce and i know history of my place very well.

That may or may not be relevant depending on what your concern is. Is your concern that the information is incorrect, or that it is irrelevant to the article? 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 20:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My contribution was helpful. I stated that 'Annabeth Chase is nobody's sidekick'. People who are looking up sidekick information should have the whole truth. My statement was relevant because ANNABETH IS NOT A SIDEKICK. Even Rick Riordan stated so in a Percy Jackson book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.85.237.244 (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about sidekicks, and your edit about someone not being a sidekick doesn't belong, especially not in the lead. There are millions of characters who aren't sidekicks. People who are looking up information will generally want to know who is a sidekick, instead of who isn't. Your information would be slightly more helpful on the Annabeth Chase page, but even there, it's probably not notable. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 11:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that rather than reverse other editors removal of pure junk, that you take the effort to clean up the section. Editors acting in the way you have keep articles full of useless junk, assuming you are concerned with being constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.136.10 (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. You can delete it as far as I'm concerned. The only reason that I proposed starting this page is because

WAMP (financial)

in in the disambiguation page for WAMP and this article's contents for WAMP (financial) was in the page for WAMP which is about WAMP software which I wanted to link to a student and WAMP (financial) was in the wrong place, cluttering up the page on WAMP software.

Kaydell (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information is not true and as an Alumni I will file libel charges against Wikipedia of the previous content. You can either remove the page in its entirety, or restore the corrections I made to the page. My next out reach will be to Jimmy.

Thank you,

- Dr. B.D. Sanders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.207.163.13 (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your main issue with the article seems to be whether or not Almeda is unaccredited. This claim is supported by multiple references, not only those in the article, but also those which I found outside. Furthermore, please do not use legal threats like "I will file libel charges against Wikipedia of the previous content" (see WP:LEGAL). Instead, resolve the conflict on the article's talk page, or through some other venue. I will complete my response later. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 14:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 069952497a. I happened to notice your report at AN/I about the editor's legal threats. I just wanted to make you aware of this page from Almeda's own website about their accreditation status. I found the page by hovering on the "ABOUT ALMEDA" tab near the top left of the page, then clicking on "Accreditation". I'm not sure if you already saw this page. but there are a few interestsing pieces of information on there, such as:

• Almeda "has earned membership and accreditation by several certifying organizations", including the "Committee for Distance Education Accreditation (CDEA)", "The Association for Online Academic Excellence (AOAEX)", and the "Interfaith Education Ministries (IEM)".
• "Accreditation by any of these organizations does not guarantee acceptance of your degree. If you are unsure about whether your employer or perspective employer will accept your degree, we encourage you to contact them before proceeding any further with us."
• "None of the accrediting agencies that recognize Almeda University are recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as one of the seven official regional accrediting agencies. This non-recognition may have some implications to include, but not limited to: 1. Almeda University is unable to participate in the Federal Student Loan/Financial Aid program. 2. Almeda University is not authorized to accept the GI Bill. 3. Almeda University is unable to guarantee acceptance of its degree programs in other postsecondary institutions. 4. Public sector employers will not recognize a degree accredited by a private accreditor. 5. Private sector employers have no obligation to accept degrees from Almeda University."

Obviously, the editor's purpose was to completely whitewash the article by removing all negative content about the organization, and all 27 of its sources. He was also attempting to imply that the organization is fully accredited by traditional, recognized agencies, because what he failed to include in the article was any specific content about their accreditation status even though, as we now know, it is already revealed on the organization's own website. One would of course have to assume that Dr. B.D. Sanders/71.207.163.13, the IP in Huntstville, Alabama, (according to WP's geolocate link on his page), is a graduate of Almeda. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 11:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi, My name is Queen and I am a dermatologist. I am very sicken by your extremely racist Melanin theory page.. I have tried to make correction to the lies you are trying to teach our community and my patients, but you keep undoing them. I would appreciate it if you would take out the word black supremacists because we both know that black supremacy does not exist.. This article deeply expresses your own hatred for all people of color. You having the experience in writing should be able to express yourself with out hurting others. but then again your personal oppinions in this article is a prime example of what you claim is true about white people, and their hatred for this world and the living beings in it. Take your personal feelings out of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoddessQueen1 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are you trying to say? Which part is racist? How does this hurt others? Where is this hatred of white people present in the article? 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 00:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay no attention to this psychotic, 069952497a. This is a prime example of a black racist whose only intent is to deny her own racism by trading on the iniquities of the past and spreading the falsehood that racism has only one origin: whites. It is patently established that black supremacy exists. "GoddessQueen1" is a prime example of such black supremacy, particularly qualified by her hatred of whites and everything associated with whites. Notice specifically her words "white people, and their hatred for this world and the living beings in it." These are the ramblings of a racist psychotic who should sooner receive mass therapy than edit any article on Wikipedia. The very statement itself is sickeningly and blatantly racist, though because of her psychosis and belief that racism can only originate from whites, she has deluded herself into believing her proclamations wholly innocent, rationalizing them through the mere fact that she is (supposedly) a nonwhite speaking against whites. Melanin theory is a vile, perverted, and racist travesty of a coherent expression, designed by black supremacists who, in their realization that their race has, to a large degree, been brutalized in this world not only by whites of years gone but also by members of their own race (e.g., the selling of slaves to Europeans for export to the New World), have attempted to introduce a false pedigree of themselves to counteract their psychotic insecurity about who they are and what abilities they possess. Enter the likes of Afrocentrism and Melanin Theory. That is all. GeraldSmosk (talk) 08:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind enabling email, I'd like to talk to you offline.--v/r - TP 13:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have enabled it. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 19:26, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 069952497a,

Thanks for your review of the SOTI Inc. page I've created.

I have tried to keep the content very factual and non-promotional- could you let me know what you saw as advertorial? I will revise it immediately.

I have tried following the same format as similar companies on the site: MobileIron and AirWatch.

I'd appreciate any help you can provide. Thank you! Msalmassian (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. None of what I saw as promotional was very obvious or blatant, but I can identify several examples which can be construed as being promotional, like:

• "...develops Mobile Device Management solutions helping organizations..."
• "...is used to manage, support, secure and track mobile workforces..."
• "...MobiControl v10 moves beyond traditional Mobile Device Management policies..."
• "...Telecom Expense Management, a Secure Content Library and more..."

All four examples sort of sound like what an advertisement would say about a company. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 20:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the specific comments 069952497a, I've edited it to sound more neutral. I hope this helps the page.

It seems the article is being considered for deletion. I hope my edits help keep the page up. Please let me know if there's anything else you see that I can edit.

I will contact the user proposing the page takedown and address his comments. Msalmassian (talk) 22:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yves Gaucher (artist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Group of Seven and Halifax

Tan Shaowen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Xie Fei

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 12:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Review follows. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Guatemala City sinkhole/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 19:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This looks pretty strong already, though there are two issues:

1. It needs a copyedit, particularly the non-definition "The 2010 Guatemala City sinkhole is a sinkhole in Guatemala City". Also, if the sinkhole has been filled in, use the past tense, "was" not "is".

2. It could use an overhead view of some sort, even if it's just the approximate dimensions of the sinkhole drawn onto an overhead view taken before or after.

Fix those, and it should be ready for GA. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I have removed the non-definition. I also found the sinkhole on google maps and it is indeed filled in. As a result I have changed the verb tense. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 19:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have also found an image which depicts the sinkhole from above. It is included in the article now. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 20:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right. The lead is still a little weak - I copyedited a little - but for an event that is, in the end, a one off, this is a good, comprehensive article.

It's a fairly short article, but the subject is, in the end, a single, one-off event, which limits the scope. It may be worth throwing an after-it-was-filled-in-image as well, but on the whole, ✓ Pass. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 20:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guatemala City sinkhole, 2010, aerial view.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tan Shaowen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LittleMountain5 00:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! These were not good faith edits, but block evasion. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice! From the STiki tool alone it's pretty hard to tell which users are blocked or not, as far as I know. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 12:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Yves Gaucher (artist) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinging to let you know that there has been a new response that needs action from you. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your recent categorisation of several articles. It's appreciated. Azylber (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

im sobhan.alizadeh my ukraine embassy in tehran have problem ? please say more. thanx --Sobhan.alizadeh (talk) 19:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)sobhan.alizadeh[reply]

I have no opinion on the article itself. The one edit of yours I reverted as vandalism was this one, where you added your signature to the article. On Wikipedia, we do not have ownership of articles; the content contributor's account name should not appear in the article (see WP:OWN). 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 00:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused, I posted only facts, we own the logo and the links are either internal wikipedia or to sites which are part of our denomination?

Antiochean (talk) 13:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the information in your article is true. However, here on Wikipedia, the criteria for inclusion as an article are not limited to whether the article is legitimate. Rather, the subject of the article must be notable. What this means is that the subject of the article must have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (quoted from WP:GNG, the General Notability Guideline). In other words, neither internal Wikipedia links nor sites of your denomination count. Internal links are not secondary sources, and thus do not meet the criterion of reliable sources. Sites of your denomination are not independent of the subject, so they also fail GNG. Unfortunately, my conclusion is that the subject of your article is not notable enough to merit inclusion on Wikipedia. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 18:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

069952497a, there's a new note for you at this nomination; your edits solved the issue in one of the two paragraphs, but more is needed in the other.

We didn't notice until very recently that you'd made edits to the article on the same day, since we don't monitor the article, just the nomination page. Please, when you make your next (and hopefully final!) edits, please let us know on the nomination page that you've done so. This will help avoid any further delays. Thanks, and best of luck with the new edits. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Second World War (Antony Beevor book), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nationalist China and Communist China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Felicia Mabuza-Suttle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hmlarson (talk) 22:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 28 October 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Could you please go back to [1] and indicate if any of the newly provided options are preferred? Thanks, Hobit (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kim Chol-man, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Kim Chol-man pioneered North Korea's munitions industry, the country's economic base? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kim Chol-man. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Ri Ul-sol at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ri Ul-sol, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ri Ul-sol is seen as an ultraconservative within North Korean politics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ri Ul-sol. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)