Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Elementary School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neier (talk | contribs) at 12:43, 16 February 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Blake Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable elementary school in Louisville, Kentucky. Fails to pass WP:N with reliable sources

Also nominating:

Grsz11 02:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I understand what you are saying, but none return any results other than those that any other school would - those review websites, school databases, etc. Grsz11 05:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's why I argue their inherent notability. Also, I think it's worth pointing out that almost all of the sources for the Highland MS (which was removed from this AfD discussion presumably because of its numerous references) are from the local newspaper in Louisville, which only supports my inherent notability argument further. (See the schools section of the essay.) At least some of those schools have been covered significantly in that same newspaper in the past, to be sure, but since obtaining those articles online is not free (the free archive only lasts 60 days, I believe) it is impossible to judge each school's noteworthiness, unless someone is going to volunteer to purchase access to those archives. KhalfaniKhaldun 05:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Cunard (talk) 06:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • High schools are notable, elementary and middle schools aren't. Redirect all per Blanchardb. JuJube (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all. This is the default treatment , and can be done without coming to AfD. Except for Blue Ribbon Schools, almost no other elementary or middle schools have succeeded in establishing individual articles. . Such should be the default way to deal with these, and it does not take AfD. DGG (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think I could prove a lot of these have been the subject of non-trivial coverage by multiple sources... Audubon Elementary School, for example, was destroyed by the Super Outbreak tornado and this was quite well documented at the time. Meyzeek and Noe Middle schools are probably the top two academically in the state, and have been for some time, and thus also have gotten a lot of coverage. I don't really know about the others for sure though. This is the problem with mass nominations. Keep Meyzeek, Noe and Weak keep on Audubon. Meyzeek gets 300+ results in a search of the Courier-Journal news stories back to just 1999, and the school's been around since well before then. --Movingday29 (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all as out of process nomination. Schools do not meet the criteria for bulk nomination. Each school has different sources and varying claims to notability and should be considered separately. Better, as DGG suggests, these should be dealt with through the proposed merges procedure. TerriersFan (talk) 04:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per WP:BEFORE; although, according to WP:BEFORE obvious redirects do not need to be brought to an already-crowded AFD. So, !voting redirect seems a little redundant. Neier (talk) 12:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]