Jump to content

PACER Plus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Sioneholof (talk | contribs)
400 edits
No edit summary
Sioneholof (talk | contribs)
400 edits
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
The value of the agreement to the Pacific is disputed.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/201841614/few-gains-for-pacific-in-pacer-deal-new-zealand-mp |title=Few gains for Pacific in PACER deal - New Zealand MP |publisher=RNZ |date=27 April 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12269451 |title=Mixed reviews on Pacific Trade deal, Pacer Plus |publisher=New Zealand Herald |date=20 September 2019 |accessdate=4 July 2020}}</ref> [[Fiji]] and [[Papua New Guinea]], the two largest Pacific island economies, have refused to join, significantly undermining the value of the deal to the Pacific.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1711/S00335/pacific-trade-deal-pacer-plus-is-pacer-minus.htm |title=Pacific trade deal PACER-Plus is PACER-minus |publisher=Scoop |date=29 November 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.abc.net.au/radio-australia/programs/pacificbeat/economist-says-pacer-plus-without-png-and-fiji-is/8538460 |title=Economist says PACER Plus without PNG and Fiji is worthless |author=Bruce Hill |publisher=ABC |date=18 May 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref> The removal of tariffs on imported Australian and New Zealand goods is expected to cause a significant loss of revenue to Pacific governments.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/2018668199/pacific-trade-deal-signatories-face-heavy-losses-report |title=Pacific trade deal signatories face heavy losses - report |publisher=RNZ |date=25 October 2018 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref> The [[Pacific Network on Globalisation]] has called the agreement "unbalanced" as key provisions on aid and labour mobility are non-binding.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/410764/watchdog-warns-of-unbalanced-pacer-plus-deal |title=Watchdog warns of 'unbalanced' Pacer Plus deal |publisher=RNZ |date=2 March 2020 |accessdate=4 July 2020}}</ref>
The value of the agreement to the Pacific is disputed.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/201841614/few-gains-for-pacific-in-pacer-deal-new-zealand-mp |title=Few gains for Pacific in PACER deal - New Zealand MP |publisher=RNZ |date=27 April 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12269451 |title=Mixed reviews on Pacific Trade deal, Pacer Plus |publisher=New Zealand Herald |date=20 September 2019 |accessdate=4 July 2020}}</ref> [[Fiji]] and [[Papua New Guinea]], the two largest Pacific island economies, have refused to join, significantly undermining the value of the deal to the Pacific.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1711/S00335/pacific-trade-deal-pacer-plus-is-pacer-minus.htm |title=Pacific trade deal PACER-Plus is PACER-minus |publisher=Scoop |date=29 November 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.abc.net.au/radio-australia/programs/pacificbeat/economist-says-pacer-plus-without-png-and-fiji-is/8538460 |title=Economist says PACER Plus without PNG and Fiji is worthless |author=Bruce Hill |publisher=ABC |date=18 May 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref> The removal of tariffs on imported Australian and New Zealand goods is expected to cause a significant loss of revenue to Pacific governments.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/2018668199/pacific-trade-deal-signatories-face-heavy-losses-report |title=Pacific trade deal signatories face heavy losses - report |publisher=RNZ |date=25 October 2018 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref> The [[Pacific Network on Globalisation]] has called the agreement "unbalanced" as key provisions on aid and labour mobility are non-binding.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/410764/watchdog-warns-of-unbalanced-pacer-plus-deal |title=Watchdog warns of 'unbalanced' Pacer Plus deal |publisher=RNZ |date=2 March 2020 |accessdate=4 July 2020}}</ref>


The PACERPLUS agreement has now come into force on 13 December 2020.{{cite web |url=https://tvniue.com/2020/12/niue-prepares-for-the-pacer-plus-trade-agreement-which-will-come-into-force-on-december-13th/ |title=Economist says PACER Plus without PNG and Fiji is worthless |author=Bruce Hill |publisher=ABC |date=18 May 2017 |accessdate=2 November 2020}}</ref>
The PACERPLUS agreement has now come into force on 13 December 2020.{{cite web |url=https://tvniue.com/2020/12/niue-prepares-for-the-pacer-plus-trade-agreement-which-will-come-into-force-on-december-13th/ |title= |author= |publisher= |date= |accessdate= 2020}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 23:37, 14 December 2020

PACER Plus is a free trade agreement between members of the Pacific Islands Forum (the Forum Island Countries plus Australia and New Zealand). The agreement expands the existing Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) to include further trade liberalisation and development assistance. It will enter into force on 13 December 2020.[1]

Negotiations on the agreement began in 2009,[1] and were completed in April 2017.[2] It was opened for signature in Nuku'alofa, Tonga in June 2017 and initially signed by eleven countries: Australia, Cook Islands, Kiribati, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.[3]

The agreement needed 8 ratifications to come into force. At the end of 2018, two signatories completed internal processes on ratifying PACERPlus, New Zealand was the first to ratify PACERPlus in Oct 2018, followed by Australia in December 2018. Samoa ratified in July 2019.[4] The Solomon Islands ratified the agreement in June 2020.[5] Niue ratified the agreement in July 2020.[6] Kiribati and Tonga have also ratified the agreement.[7] The Cook Islands ratified in October.[8][9] The agreement will enter into force in December 2020.[10]

The value of the agreement to the Pacific is disputed.[11][12] Fiji and Papua New Guinea, the two largest Pacific island economies, have refused to join, significantly undermining the value of the deal to the Pacific.[13][14] The removal of tariffs on imported Australian and New Zealand goods is expected to cause a significant loss of revenue to Pacific governments.[15] The Pacific Network on Globalisation has called the agreement "unbalanced" as key provisions on aid and labour mobility are non-binding.[16]

The PACERPLUS agreement has now come into force on 13 December 2020.Esther Pavihi (10 December 2020). "Niue prepares for the PACERPLUS trade agreement which will come into force on 13 December". BCN TVNIUE News. Retrieved 14 December 2020.</ref>

References

  1. ^ a b "Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) Plus". Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  2. ^ "PACER Plus about development as much as trade". RNZ. 21 April 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  3. ^ "PACER Plus". New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Retrieved 2018-09-18.
  4. ^ "Samoa Ratifies Pacer Plus Trade Deal". Radio NZ International. 22 July 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
  5. ^ "Solomons ratifies Pacer Plus amid calls for re-think". RNZ. 23 June 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  6. ^ "Niue ratifies regional PACER Plus trade agreement". RNZ. 3 July 2020. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
  7. ^ "Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) Plus". Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  8. ^ Samantha Magick (15 October 2020). "Cook Islands ratifies PACER Plus". Islands Business. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  9. ^ Rashneel Kumar (19 October 2020). "Regional trade agreement brings new hope to growers". Cook Islands News. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  10. ^ Koroi Hawkins (2 November 2020). "Is the Pacific's new trade deal an early Xmas gift or a double edged sword?". RNZ. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  11. ^ "Few gains for Pacific in PACER deal - New Zealand MP". RNZ. 27 April 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  12. ^ "Mixed reviews on Pacific Trade deal, Pacer Plus". New Zealand Herald. 20 September 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
  13. ^ "Pacific trade deal PACER-Plus is PACER-minus". Scoop. 29 November 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  14. ^ Bruce Hill (18 May 2017). "Economist says PACER Plus without PNG and Fiji is worthless". ABC. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  15. ^ "Pacific trade deal signatories face heavy losses - report". RNZ. 25 October 2018. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  16. ^ "Watchdog warns of 'unbalanced' Pacer Plus deal". RNZ. 2 March 2020. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
Stub icon

This international trade related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PACER_Plus&oldid=994289966"