User talk:Ritsaiph: Difference between revisions

Its ritsaiph.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 04:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ritsaiph. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am notifying you of a complaint on the WP:AN/3RR noticeboard here. -Kudzu1 (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing, making personal attacks [1], and edit warring (at War in Donbass). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to War in Donbass, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at War in Donbass. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.
Please note that this should be discussed on the talk page of the article in question, not edit warred on individual user's talk page. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritsaiph. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 23:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akhtar Mansoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashtun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I made a slight change to your reverted version in respect to the infobox data which I hope you'll agree is the correct choice and version now. Thanks Antrangelos (talk) 13:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Antrangelos, I will leave it, but I used it the way it was for consistency. It is how Mansoor's predecessor Mohammed Omar has his info-box set out. --Ritsaiph (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K, fine, very good, no problem (no problemo) Antrangelos (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mullah Mohammed Omar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Najibullah (militant leader), Ritsaiph!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article is confusing. The intro states Omar Khatib is a pseudonym, then the article concludes with the death of "Mullah Omar". Are these the same people? Is the subject of this article alive or dead?

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent copyright violations and disruption of the incident noticeboard here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 11:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abu Mohammad al-Julani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad-Ali Ramin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Afghan Taliban mujaheddin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taliban training video, 2014.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Islamic State (IS) insurgents, Anbar Province, Iraq.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uday Hussein,Iraq.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although you are doing a good job in refuting ludicrous plots by premature media reports, please don't put triple parentheses around organs that are, or are presumed to be, under Jewish influence. It ruins your argument and makes it look immature. "Keep cool" should apply, there a million ways to refute bullshit without having to resort to this. '''tAD''' (talk) 14:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry if I offended you. --Ritsaiph (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, you didn't offend me. It's just that others will take your argument less seriously if you do that, or if you (I'm not saying you did) use other 4chan/alt-right clichés '''tAD''' (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am answering you here, because this subject has turned off-topic.

The whole point of my comment was that such ideologies exist also among those originally none-European. My reply was contextual when I added that persons name, as you said who has died in the 80s. Generally those who commit ideological crimes have a role model, I just pointed who that might be for an Iranian ultra-nationalist who might be living in Munich. I personally do not believe that that was the case here. I don't like how my answers turned up to be I wish I had remained silent here. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 15:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at File:TrayvonMartinHooded.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VQuakr (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you replaced a picture of two people at the Trayvon Martin protest with a picture of gorillas. Since you have been warned multiple times for this behavior, it's my feeling you are not here to build an encyclopedia, and should be blocked from editing indefinitely. I'm posting this to inform you that I'm reporting that edit. Rockypedia (talk) 22:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As this is not your first act of blatant image-related disruption, I am blocking you indefinitely as I have no confidence it won't happen again. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What evs devs, I'll just use my vpn, make multiple new accounts and 'unblock' myself that way. --Ritsaiph (talk) 06:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]