Talk:Aversives: Difference between revisions

Psychology Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Autism Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

can some one tell me da difference between risk averse and action oriented individuals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Wrong use of aversive, and talk pages aren't here to answer questions. Try the reference desk. WLU (talk) 15:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People have wildly edited this page with no discussion. The controversial aspects of using aversives on autistic people needs to be included. The previous sections were not NPOV. It's hard to be NPOV on a technique which many consider torture, but it is possible. I will attempt it. People who use Wikipedia deserve to read all aspects of a subject, whether practitioners like it or not. Berkeleysappho (talk) 05:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing without discussion is common when the edits are not challenged. Be sure to document any potentially controversial additions using relialbe sources. WLU (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]