User talk:Eagles247: Difference between revisions

Welcome to Eagles 24/7's Talk Page!

Please add your comments at the bottom of this page. If I leave you a message on your talk page and you reply there, please do not leave a {{talkback}} template on this page, because there is a good chance that I have watchlisted your talk page. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C)

Archives

May 2009–August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011

Eagles, 24.239.153.58 has decided to take his campaign to a new level. As you can see, I am not engaging him, and perhaps Magog will also get a sense of what is truly going on here.

The 24 IP address, which comes out of Queens Village, NY is impersonating me using other IP addresses in an attempt to get the attention of administrators. Today, he used 198.83.120.99 , based out of Rego Park, Queens, a short distance from Queens Village, NY, to impersonate me. The Rego Park address is likely his work address, for it is registered to ANS Communications. His 24. IP usually edits outside normal work hours.

He used the Rego Park IP to post a threatening message on his Queens Village IP Talk Page -- using language that suggested it was me -- likely in the hopes that you or Magog would see it and take action against me.

After work hours, he returned to his Queens Village IP and wrote on my Talk Page, attacking me for purportedly threatening him.

I am appealing to you in the hopes that I can make you aware of what he is doing (and what he has been doing) so you are not fooled by his latest game and end up blocking me. I am ignoring him; he is not only a vandal with too much time on his hands, but he is also a troll. Magog quickly reversed his recent edits to my Talk Page; I am hoping that he is also beginning to see what has truly been going on here for months. This sounds like Kindergarten stuff -- because it is. But I'm not playing the game, and as long as you know what's going on and will not block me immediately when you see his nonsense, I can continue to ignore.

Thanks. 97.77.103.82 (talk) 00:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the most curious pieces of information here is that he says "I'm gonna be off the block really soon" (which makes no sense since there are no current blocks on your IP and the indefinite blocks on your two registered accounts will not expire "soon"), and "we'll see who is gonna win this edit war!" is also curious since there is no recent edit warring going on, as you have ceased edit warring since your last block expired. I'm blocking the 24.x IP for disruption, harassment, and sockpuppetry. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless 97 is hatching a reverse plot by communicating with a friend in Queens to log into a public IP, and to purposefully type in a way that would be like 24. I doubt it tough. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, and I also notice the excessive use of exclamation marks by 24 in edit summaries and talk page comments, which also appears in the message by 198. 97 rarely uses exclamation marks in messages. Further, 24 adds new sections titled in lowercase instead of capitalizing the first word, while 97 capitalizes headings properly. I'm convinced that 198 is not 97. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Eagles, for looking into this. As I am sure you also noticed, 198 has been vandalizing and defacing numerous Wikipedia pages for the last five years. This new revelation tells one that 24 has been around for a long time and has been using similar tactics for almost half a decade. And one might only wonder how many other registered or IP accounts he uses or has used in the past. Thanks again. 97.77.103.82 (talk) 03:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If 198 is truly his work IP, that means he is not the only one with that IP address. Most likely, the unconstructive edits are from other people besides him. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)(edit conflict)Actually it seems more like the IP is shared amongst the entire company. I know my IP at my last job was. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eagles, I took a look at what has been going on; it seems as though you have caught several more sockpuppets (the newest 198 is also affiliated with ANS communications out of Rego Park, NY, which I am sure that you noticed).

I see that you blocked them, and I assume that you have confirmed them to be sockpuppets of 24? 97.77.103.82 (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to confirm, but I suspect they are sockpuppets/meatpuppets of 24. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not defend my warring with him in the past, for it was not right (I should have appealed to you and calmly explained the viciousness and ways of this individual). But there is some justice in the fact that you -- and I am sure numerous other administrators -- are seeing the type of individual with whom I was dealing. Again, I was wrong to engage him in the past, but I am glad that he has now exposed himself to all (and it seems like he is digging himself deeper as each day passes). 97.77.103.82 (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took the time to look up those IP address and there locations. They Geolocate to NY, NY and New Paltz, NY. One is a short distance from Woodbury NY. From where one of the 97's IPs were. I am also not going to edit war with user 97 or try to do the he said she said or say that this individual is "vicious" or anything of the sort since this would simply violate civility What I will do is continue on with my editing to paint a realistic and balanced article. I am also collecting evidence to post for later on. 24.239.153.58 (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A civil environment is a productive one, so as long as you don't bring out the personal attacks again (and edit with a neutral point of view), it will be alright. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll say it again. I was railroaded. I don't have a history of this while the other user did. My edits create a balance and are typically not about providing public relations. 24.239.153.58 (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at editing style and behavioral evidence in making my decision to block you. The IPs that infiltrated your talk page matched up perfectly to how you edit. The only piece of evidence in your favor was your lack of socking in the past, which did not outweigh the behavioral comparison against you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eagles -- 24, just off block, is literally re-making the St. John's page. He refuses to discuss any of his major changes, many of which are factually inaccurate, poorly written, and disingenuous. I ask for your immediate assistance. Thank you. 97.77.103.82 (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, 24 said above that one of his sockpuppets used last week was located near "where one of 97's (sic) IPs (sic) were." Magog determined that the IP was not connected to me and removed references to any possible connection. It was likely yet another one of 24's sockpuppets. 97.77.103.82 (talk) 23:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jeremy Kerley, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jeremy Kerley (pictured) was recruited by Texas and Stanford to play baseball and by Oklahoma to play college football, but he ultimately decided to play football for Texas Christian University? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

|unsigned doesn't seem to be working with Panthers... Pats1 ^T/C 00:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since he was drafted, can you undelete his article?--Yankees10 23:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 28bytes (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and I'm not sure why you not being an admin would matter if you are still a trusted member of the community. Non-admins can close RfAs per NOTNOW, and this appeared to be a similar case. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's just say he may not be fully aware of the community norms. I got a similar response from Baseball Bugs yesterday when I tried to close a pointless AN/I thread. Guess I'll have to run for adminship if I want to keep closing down threads that have served their purpose. 28bytes (talk) 20:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Please? Haha. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your comments about Mendenhall...would like to hear back from you to discuss why you think the way you do about the issue in more depth. Sleetman (talk) 00:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]