Talk:Crown Heights riot: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Clearly biased |
Akerensky99 (talk | contribs) unsigned comments have no effect |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It is clear that your article was biased. It makes absolutely no attempt at all to tell the African-American side of the riot. It tries to make it a black and white, Jewish= victim, Black= aggressor, situation when that belies in the face of the actual facts of the riot. Do more research and be honest with you assessment next time. |
It is clear that your article was biased. It makes absolutely no attempt at all to tell the African-American side of the riot. It tries to make it a black and white, Jewish= victim, Black= aggressor, situation when that belies in the face of the actual facts of the riot. Do more research and be honest with you assessment next time. |
||
== unsigned comments have no effect == |
|||
Perhaps if you signed your comments and actually made suggestions for improvement we would take you seriously.[[User:Akerensky99|Akerensky99]] 07:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:01, 27 February 2006
Merge Article
There are two articles that cover this event -- Crown Heights Riot and Crown Heights riots. Both articles should be merged and NPOV'd. --Micahbrwn 18:39, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- I've merged them both into this article, but someone wit more knowledge of the event should NPOV Saberwyn 03:48, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Clearly biased
It is clear that your article was biased. It makes absolutely no attempt at all to tell the African-American side of the riot. It tries to make it a black and white, Jewish= victim, Black= aggressor, situation when that belies in the face of the actual facts of the riot. Do more research and be honest with you assessment next time.
unsigned comments have no effect
Perhaps if you signed your comments and actually made suggestions for improvement we would take you seriously.Akerensky99 07:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)