User talk:KEmel49: Difference between revisions

This is KEmel49's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 8 days

Hi KEmel49! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

2024 North East Olympic Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Standing for election is not notable in itself - Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hafiz Rashid Ahmed Choudhury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KEmel49. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carrom Pool:Disc game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Little Danes experiment
(fa:آزمایش دانمارکی‌های کوچک)

Please be bold and help translate this article!

---

The little Danes experiment was a 1951 Danish operation where 22 Greenlandic Inuit children were sent to Danish foster families in an attempt to re-educate them as "little Danes". While the children were all supposed to be orphans, most were not. Six children were adopted while in Denmark, and sixteen returned to Greenland, only to be placed in Danish-speaking orphanages and never live with their families again. Half of the children experienced mental health disturbances, and half of them died in young adulthood. The government of Denmark officially apologised in 2020, after several years of demands from Greenlandic officials.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

---

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 Submit your nominations here • Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Contests • Mailing list • CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators: AssociateAffiliate and Vestrian24Bio •

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @KEmel49, thanks for noticing my changes. I am building up the page gradually and I always leaving it in a consistent state so if someone reads it, it is better than how it was in the previous version. I am saving as little as possible to avoid publishing the page in an inconsistent state. I don't agree that the changes I made are redundant. For example my changes added that the technology is now commoditized and is available on many devices (iPhone, meta quest, Apple Vision Pro) and I am adding a paragraph about the significance of the technology to the visual effects and movie industry - as multiple academy awards (oscars) were given to the developers of such technologies. Your revert happened just before I added the reference to this.

I am also depth that is missing in the current article about the importance of capturing micro expressions with motion capture (which is not easy to do with animation) and the concept of facial motion capture transfer - which is very important in the industry and doesn't appear in the page. On a next edit I will references to scientific article discussing both concepts.

The reason I don't want to use a sandbox is that I want to make incremental value immediately. If I wait until I have all the changes in, it will take longer for others to benefit from the contributions. This is why I always leave the page in a consistent state - which is better that the previous edit. Another challenge with working with a sandbox is that if I take several days or weeks to edit a page in the sandbox, the original page may change and merging my change will be more challenging. If I do smaller changed in the sandbox, the number of edits will still be high.

I am wonder what triggered your action - the number of changes, the small time between the edits, etc.?

I hope you will see the value in the changes I am doing and will allow me to continue my work. ThothOfTheSouth (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me understand what I did wrong so I don't do it again. I could not tell from your note. Your help is much appreciated @KEmel49 ThothOfTheSouth (talk) 05:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThothOfTheSouth, Please see WP:MOS, WP:ACM and WP:WBA. In your this edit, you have replaced whole section with non-cited texts which is against guideline of Wikipedia
Also i see that you are asking what had triggered me to take such action on your edit, well that's because your edit was against simple guidelines. still if you think i did something wrong feel free to ask me here. Thank you.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 09:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KEmel49 you removed my section before I added a the cited section. The previous section was really poor and I could improve it because it was really out of date and irrelevant. @KEmel49, I will get my section back with citations as a single edit. ThothOfTheSouth (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThothOfTheSouth In that case first gather all references and edit at your sandbox as it would be a testing edit. do not remove any content or replace anything without references. if you can't dedicate enough time at a moment, do edit at sandbox one by one then only apply at main article. Furthermore, any changes without satisfactory reason or citation would be reverted. if you think that any paragraph, section or whole article Facial motion capture have no references then you can add {{Citation needed}}, {{Unreferenced section}}, {{Citation style}} or {{More citation needed}} based on situation.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 15:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]