Jump to content

Talk:Christopher Fairbank: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Aredbeardeddwarf - ""
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
| blp=yes
| blp=yes
}}
}}

Why the hell is information on this article constantly being reverted because "IMDB is an unreliable source"? There's no better source than IMDB for the Clint Eastwood article rt say CLint Eastwood was in Dirty Harry. This is common, well-known information. What source other than IMDB do you think shopuld be used to list every well-known tv show this well known actor was in? This is childish adherence to the letter of the rules for no good reason.
14:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aredbeardeddwarf|Aredbeardeddwarf]] ([[User talk:Aredbeardeddwarf#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aredbeardeddwarf|contribs]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->




Line 29: Line 26:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


== Constant reversion of basic information ==
Why the hell is information on this article constantly being reverted because "IMDB is an unreliable source"? There's no better source than IMDB for the Clint Eastwood article say Eastwood was in Dirty Harry. This is common, well-known information. What source other than IMDB do you think shopuld be used to list every well-known tv show this well known actor was in? This is childish adherence to the letter of the rules for no good reason.
[[User:Aredbeardeddwarf|Aredbeardeddwarf]] ([[User talk:Aredbeardeddwarf|talk]]) 14:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:15, 10 May 2023


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christopher Fairbank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Constant reversion of basic information

Why the hell is information on this article constantly being reverted because "IMDB is an unreliable source"? There's no better source than IMDB for the Clint Eastwood article to say Clint Eastwood was in Dirty Harry. This is common, well-known information. What source other than IMDB do you think shopuld be used to list every well-known tv show this well known actor was in, and why does this article require it when other actor's articles do not? This is childish adherence to the letter of the rules for no good reason. Aredbeardeddwarf (talk) 14:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]