Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Mure: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
keep |
Piecesofuk (talk | contribs) →Andrew Mure: keep |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep''' I believe judges of the [[Supreme Court of Mauritius]] ''pass'' [[WP:JUDGE]], even those that served during the country's colonial period. Furthermore, this one has been knighted, which is almost invariably held as an indication of notability. At least two obituaries are available on Google Books: [https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Scots_Law_Times/EdQkZoszrtQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Sir+Andrew+Mure%22&pg=PA117&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Old_lore_Miscellany_of_Orkney_Shetland_C/g4jRAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Sir+Andrew+Mure%22&pg=PA116&printsec=frontcover] and there's coverage available in period newspapers. Seems like a clear keep to me. [[User:Jfire|Jfire]] ([[User talk:Jfire|talk]]) 21:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' I believe judges of the [[Supreme Court of Mauritius]] ''pass'' [[WP:JUDGE]], even those that served during the country's colonial period. Furthermore, this one has been knighted, which is almost invariably held as an indication of notability. At least two obituaries are available on Google Books: [https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Scots_Law_Times/EdQkZoszrtQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Sir+Andrew+Mure%22&pg=PA117&printsec=frontcover], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Old_lore_Miscellany_of_Orkney_Shetland_C/g4jRAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Sir+Andrew+Mure%22&pg=PA116&printsec=frontcover] and there's coverage available in period newspapers. Seems like a clear keep to me. [[User:Jfire|Jfire]] ([[User talk:Jfire|talk]]) 21:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. The rationale presented by [[User:Jfire|Jfire]] is convincing. [[User:BoyTheKingCanDance|BoyTheKingCanDance]] ([[User talk:BoyTheKingCanDance|talk]]) 04:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. The rationale presented by [[User:Jfire|Jfire]] is convincing. [[User:BoyTheKingCanDance|BoyTheKingCanDance]] ([[User talk:BoyTheKingCanDance|talk]]) 04:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Notable: he was [https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/27044/page/380 knighted in 1899]; [https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/search/results/1909-10-01/1909-10-31?basicsearch=andrew%20mure&somesearch=andrew%20mure&retrievecountrycounts=false plenty of coverage of his death in 1909] [[User:Piecesofuk|Piecesofuk]] ([[User talk:Piecesofuk|talk]]) 15:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:09, 13 February 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Andrew Mure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:JUDGE. One sentence in a book isn't going to do it. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Mauritius, and Scotland. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:48, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I can find some coverage through Newspapers.com: e.g. 1. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I believe judges of the Supreme Court of Mauritius pass WP:JUDGE, even those that served during the country's colonial period. Furthermore, this one has been knighted, which is almost invariably held as an indication of notability. At least two obituaries are available on Google Books: [1], [2] and there's coverage available in period newspapers. Seems like a clear keep to me. Jfire (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The rationale presented by Jfire is convincing. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Notable: he was knighted in 1899; plenty of coverage of his death in 1909 Piecesofuk (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)