User talk:TheGr8Scorpio: Difference between revisions

Hi TheGr8Scorpio! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 11:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Refrain from engaging in disruptive editing on Panjshir conflict.

India Today is a IFCN verified fact checker thus reliable whether you like it or not. Keep your vendetta against reliable sources just because they happen to be Indian out of Wikipedia. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 11:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgethedragonslayer: Nop, not reliable at all. Indian Media loves to peddle fake news when it concerns Pakistan, that's a fact. You've been repeatedly reverting the edit to make it seem like it's reliable. It's not, so stop it. :••TheGr8Scorpio ^{(Let's Talk? 🙂)} 12:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IFCN fact checkers like India Today are undoubtedly reliable and your absurd logic won't change it. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgethedragonslayer: Doesn't mean that it can't spread fake news, what bullshit is this? Indian Media is peddling in Fake news, once again, and Wikipedia is being used to spread that fake news. I'm not having it with your propaganda. Bring in an Admin if you really care. :•��TheGr8Scorpio ^{(Let's Talk? 🙂)} 12:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TolWol56 (talk) 12:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TolWol56: Quite surprising that only Indian Media is reporting on this, well not really. It's not disruptive editing, and I will continue to revert it until you bring a reliable source. In the same way, I'll also report you :) :••TheGr8Scorpio ^{(Let's Talk? 🙂)} 12:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]