39 reviews
A fine mist of the gothic lingers over The Lost Moment, as it would do in the following year's A Portrait of Jennie a mist that blurs the boundaries between past and present, between the quick and the dead. As it happens, Leonardo Bercovici adapted the screenplays for both movies, for The Lost Moment drawing (rather distantly) from Henry James' The Aspern Papers. And as in A Portrait of Jennie, his script made a haunting plunge into nineteenth-century romanticism, a rhapsody on obsession and loss.
The Lost Moment takes place (as all nineteenth-century rhapsodies should) in Venice, voluptuous and miasmatic. Arriving there incognito is a young New Yorker engaged in the literary trade (Robert Cummings), on the trail of love letters written by a poet who, after mysteriously disappearing decades before, has become a legend. Cummings knows that publishing the letters will make his name and his fortune, but he must be cagey about his purposes. The poet's mistress Juliana (Agnes Moorehead), is now a recluse of 105 living in reduced circumstances. Posing as a writer of means wanting to finish his novel, Cummings arranges to take rooms in her gloomy old palazzo.
Manderley was more inviting. The Mrs. Danvers of the piece proves to be Susan Hayward, the recluse's niece, grand-niece or even more distant kin. Draped in black with hair wrenched back into a bun, she dutifully carries out her aunt's wishes but makes it plain that Cummings' welcome will be chilly. The trappings are old-dark-house as well, with a servant girl who wanders the halls at night when she's not howling and whimpering, presumably from beatings by Hayward. Eventually Cummings meets the enfeebled Moorehead, whose dotage has not dimmed her mind or dulled her relish for the crafty games she plays; only she can lead him to the letters and shed light on the fate of their author. Events even stranger take place: At night, lured by ghostly piano music, Cummings finds Hayward, radiant in white, her tresses loosed, convinced that she is Juliana and he her poet-lover; as he phrases it, she's `walking dead among the living and living among the dead.' The claustrophobic menage-a-trois takes yet another Jamesian turning....
The Lost Moment is the sole directorial effort by Martin Gabel, a character actor who was married to Arlene Francis. Due either to his inexperience or holes in the script, some strands of the story lead nowhere, like that of the servant girl. Another concerns John Archer, whose aid Cummings enlists though he neither likes nor trusts him; his motives remain murky, and ultimately his sub-plot just fizzles out. Cummings proves another drawback. Always a weak actor, he sometimes (Kings Row, The Chase) rose to serviceable, and does here. Moorehead, buried under old-crone makeup and furlongs of black lace, is barely recognizable by visage or even by voice. Hayward's the surprise, negotiating the shifts from stern spinster to distraught damsel with grace and conviction.
Yet Gabel brings it off. Slow and resolutely low-key until it nears its finish, The Lost Moment stays compelling throughout, a literal-minded version of James' story that manages to maintain an languorous integrity all its own.
The Lost Moment takes place (as all nineteenth-century rhapsodies should) in Venice, voluptuous and miasmatic. Arriving there incognito is a young New Yorker engaged in the literary trade (Robert Cummings), on the trail of love letters written by a poet who, after mysteriously disappearing decades before, has become a legend. Cummings knows that publishing the letters will make his name and his fortune, but he must be cagey about his purposes. The poet's mistress Juliana (Agnes Moorehead), is now a recluse of 105 living in reduced circumstances. Posing as a writer of means wanting to finish his novel, Cummings arranges to take rooms in her gloomy old palazzo.
Manderley was more inviting. The Mrs. Danvers of the piece proves to be Susan Hayward, the recluse's niece, grand-niece or even more distant kin. Draped in black with hair wrenched back into a bun, she dutifully carries out her aunt's wishes but makes it plain that Cummings' welcome will be chilly. The trappings are old-dark-house as well, with a servant girl who wanders the halls at night when she's not howling and whimpering, presumably from beatings by Hayward. Eventually Cummings meets the enfeebled Moorehead, whose dotage has not dimmed her mind or dulled her relish for the crafty games she plays; only she can lead him to the letters and shed light on the fate of their author. Events even stranger take place: At night, lured by ghostly piano music, Cummings finds Hayward, radiant in white, her tresses loosed, convinced that she is Juliana and he her poet-lover; as he phrases it, she's `walking dead among the living and living among the dead.' The claustrophobic menage-a-trois takes yet another Jamesian turning....
The Lost Moment is the sole directorial effort by Martin Gabel, a character actor who was married to Arlene Francis. Due either to his inexperience or holes in the script, some strands of the story lead nowhere, like that of the servant girl. Another concerns John Archer, whose aid Cummings enlists though he neither likes nor trusts him; his motives remain murky, and ultimately his sub-plot just fizzles out. Cummings proves another drawback. Always a weak actor, he sometimes (Kings Row, The Chase) rose to serviceable, and does here. Moorehead, buried under old-crone makeup and furlongs of black lace, is barely recognizable by visage or even by voice. Hayward's the surprise, negotiating the shifts from stern spinster to distraught damsel with grace and conviction.
Yet Gabel brings it off. Slow and resolutely low-key until it nears its finish, The Lost Moment stays compelling throughout, a literal-minded version of James' story that manages to maintain an languorous integrity all its own.
"The Lost Moment" is one of the strangest films of the 1940s I have seen. I am not saying it's bad--just very, very different. The film is based on a story by Henry James ("The Aspern Papers") although like MOST films they liberally change the story. One of the most obvious is the character played by Susan Hayward. In the original story, she's described as plain and unattractive--something you could never have said about Hayward. In this film, she is gorgeous and is paired with an odd choice for a leading man, Robert Cummings. Now I am not complaining or saying Cummings was a bad choice--just an odd one since he was a bit older and not the dashing leading man you'd normally expect in a movie.
The story was originally based on a notion that some love letters from Percy Shelley were hidden somewhere and literary folks were drooling to find them. Here in "The Lost Moment", they use a fictional name for a guy who was clearly modeled after Shelley. But, unlike Shelley, this poet was an American and he simply disappeared in his prime! The only possible clue to his disappearance is the same woman who was in love with this man--and who supposedly has these love letters. But, she's an ancient recluse and has thus far resisted talking about her old lover and has refused to allow people to read these letters....if they even still exist.
Cummings plays a newspaper writer and an opportunist. His plan is to somehow get into this home with the old lady (who is now 105--played by Agnes Moorehead under a ton of makeup). When he learns she is greatly in need of money, he offers to rent out one of her rooms. While they receive him VERY coolly, he is able to secure a room and soon notices just how oppressively dismal the place is. It's like a morgue and a strong brooding sense of doom is well conveyed in the film. I won't discuss the plot any more--it would ruin the suspense. However, to me the plot, though interesting, isn't as important as the mood--which is really excellently conveyed. An interesting film--as there just aren't many like it.
The story was originally based on a notion that some love letters from Percy Shelley were hidden somewhere and literary folks were drooling to find them. Here in "The Lost Moment", they use a fictional name for a guy who was clearly modeled after Shelley. But, unlike Shelley, this poet was an American and he simply disappeared in his prime! The only possible clue to his disappearance is the same woman who was in love with this man--and who supposedly has these love letters. But, she's an ancient recluse and has thus far resisted talking about her old lover and has refused to allow people to read these letters....if they even still exist.
Cummings plays a newspaper writer and an opportunist. His plan is to somehow get into this home with the old lady (who is now 105--played by Agnes Moorehead under a ton of makeup). When he learns she is greatly in need of money, he offers to rent out one of her rooms. While they receive him VERY coolly, he is able to secure a room and soon notices just how oppressively dismal the place is. It's like a morgue and a strong brooding sense of doom is well conveyed in the film. I won't discuss the plot any more--it would ruin the suspense. However, to me the plot, though interesting, isn't as important as the mood--which is really excellently conveyed. An interesting film--as there just aren't many like it.
- planktonrules
- Dec 9, 2011
- Permalink
The Lost Moment is directed by Martin Gabel and adapted by Leonardo Bercovici from the Henry James novel, The Aspern Papers. It stars Robert Cummings, Susan Hayward, Agnes Moorehead and Eduardo Ciannelli. Music is by Daniele Amfitheatrof and cinematography by Hal Mohr.
Lewis Venable (Cummings) is a publisher who travels to Venice in search of love letters written by poet Jeffrey Ashton. Insinuating himself into the home of the poets lover and recipient of the letters, Juliana Bordereau (Moorehead), Venable finds himself transfixed by the strangeness of the place and its inhabitants, one of which is Juliana's off kilter niece, Tina (Hayward).
A splendid slice of Gothicana done up in film noir fancy dress, The Lost Moment is hauntingly romantic and ethereal in its weirdness. It's very talky, so the impatient should be advised, but the visuals and the frequent influx of dreamy like sequences hold the attention right to the denouement. The narrative is devilish by intent, with shifting identities, sexual tensions, intrigue and hidden secrets the orders of the day.
Cummings is a little awkward and his scenes with Hayward (very good in a tricky role) lacks an urgent spark, while old hands Moorehead (as a centenarian with an outstanding makeup job) and Ciannelli leave favourable marks in the smaller roles. Mohr's (The Phantom of the Opera) photography is gorgeous and bathes the pic in atmosphere, and Amfitheatrof's musical compositions are powerful in their subtleties. As for Gabel? With this being his only foray into directing, it stands as a shame he didn't venture further into the directing sphere. 7/10
Lewis Venable (Cummings) is a publisher who travels to Venice in search of love letters written by poet Jeffrey Ashton. Insinuating himself into the home of the poets lover and recipient of the letters, Juliana Bordereau (Moorehead), Venable finds himself transfixed by the strangeness of the place and its inhabitants, one of which is Juliana's off kilter niece, Tina (Hayward).
A splendid slice of Gothicana done up in film noir fancy dress, The Lost Moment is hauntingly romantic and ethereal in its weirdness. It's very talky, so the impatient should be advised, but the visuals and the frequent influx of dreamy like sequences hold the attention right to the denouement. The narrative is devilish by intent, with shifting identities, sexual tensions, intrigue and hidden secrets the orders of the day.
Cummings is a little awkward and his scenes with Hayward (very good in a tricky role) lacks an urgent spark, while old hands Moorehead (as a centenarian with an outstanding makeup job) and Ciannelli leave favourable marks in the smaller roles. Mohr's (The Phantom of the Opera) photography is gorgeous and bathes the pic in atmosphere, and Amfitheatrof's musical compositions are powerful in their subtleties. As for Gabel? With this being his only foray into directing, it stands as a shame he didn't venture further into the directing sphere. 7/10
- hitchcockthelegend
- Jan 24, 2017
- Permalink
No need to detail the plot since others have done it better than I can.
Once again I'm reminded that Susan Hayward was one of Hollywood's finest actresses despite her glamorous good looks. Here she does triple duty while under the spell of an ossified aunt (an unrecognizable Moorehead) and, of course, a darkly haunted mansion. One minute she's severely repressed Tina; the next she's a deluded but happy Tina; and finally she's a liberated Tina, who's happily her true self. The versatile actress manages all three persuasively, though repressed Tina in her severe hair bun almost had me under the couch.
If Tina's having trouble with her identity, so's Venable (Cummings) who's at the mansion under false pretenses. But once he's scoped out a flowing-haired Tina, he's having trouble deciding whether he's really a sneaky publisher on a lucrative mission or just another hormonally driven ankle-chaser. Sunny actor Cummings may seem an odd choice for roaming dark mansions, still he low-keys throughout, allowing the story's Gothic merits to remain uppermost.
And what great atmosphere the staging produces. Sure, events never leave the soundstage, yet that move allows full artistic control of visual effects, which are as much a movie presence here as the performers themselves. And, oh yes, mustn't overlook poor Joan Loring as the repressed servant Amelia. Hers is a movingly soulful performance that at times is almost tearful. Too bad her character- track just sort of vanishes to no conclusion. And that's a downside in the script, as John Archer's rather villainous character is also abruptly abandoned for no apparent purpose. It may be that the screenplay tried to adapt too much of the Henry James novel and ended up cutting some corners
All in all, this is vintage Hollywood hitting on at least seven cylinders despite somewhat derivative material. And a lot of that success I think is owed to outstanding producer Walter Wanger, a position in the production chain that's too often overlooked.
Once again I'm reminded that Susan Hayward was one of Hollywood's finest actresses despite her glamorous good looks. Here she does triple duty while under the spell of an ossified aunt (an unrecognizable Moorehead) and, of course, a darkly haunted mansion. One minute she's severely repressed Tina; the next she's a deluded but happy Tina; and finally she's a liberated Tina, who's happily her true self. The versatile actress manages all three persuasively, though repressed Tina in her severe hair bun almost had me under the couch.
If Tina's having trouble with her identity, so's Venable (Cummings) who's at the mansion under false pretenses. But once he's scoped out a flowing-haired Tina, he's having trouble deciding whether he's really a sneaky publisher on a lucrative mission or just another hormonally driven ankle-chaser. Sunny actor Cummings may seem an odd choice for roaming dark mansions, still he low-keys throughout, allowing the story's Gothic merits to remain uppermost.
And what great atmosphere the staging produces. Sure, events never leave the soundstage, yet that move allows full artistic control of visual effects, which are as much a movie presence here as the performers themselves. And, oh yes, mustn't overlook poor Joan Loring as the repressed servant Amelia. Hers is a movingly soulful performance that at times is almost tearful. Too bad her character- track just sort of vanishes to no conclusion. And that's a downside in the script, as John Archer's rather villainous character is also abruptly abandoned for no apparent purpose. It may be that the screenplay tried to adapt too much of the Henry James novel and ended up cutting some corners
All in all, this is vintage Hollywood hitting on at least seven cylinders despite somewhat derivative material. And a lot of that success I think is owed to outstanding producer Walter Wanger, a position in the production chain that's too often overlooked.
- dougdoepke
- Mar 4, 2016
- Permalink
Robert Cummings and Susan Hayward star in "The Lost Moment" also starring Agnes Moorhead, Joan Lorring, and Eduardo Cianelli.
Cummings plays Lewis Venable, a New York publisher visiting Venice with the goal of getting his hands on the love letters of a poet from the 19th Century, Jeffrey Ashton. The passionate letters were betwen Ashton and Juliana Bordereau.
Venable, under an assumed name, rents a room in the Bordereau house, a kind of grand guignol, dark place. Juliana (Moorhead) by this time is 105 years old and a recluse. She is being cared for by a niece, Tina, a woman who never smiles and is very strict. She obviously does not want Venable in the house. However, the family needs the money.
One night he hears music from somewhere in the house. Walking through the garden, he finally traces it to the embodiment of the young Juliana, a graceful woman with beautiful red hair falling around her shoulders, and she is wearing a beautiful gown It's Tina, who somehow steps into the past and becomes Juliana when she enters the room. To her, he is Jeffrey.
The family priest (Cianelli) warns Venable to ne careful rather than distroy Tina's loose hold on reality. But Venable wants those letters; he wants to know where they're hidden, and he plans on taking them.
I really enjoyed this. Robert Cummings is a lightweight and wrong for this - I would have loved to have seen Tyrone Power do it - but Susan Hayward was excellent in a dual role, and very beautiful.
Cummings plays Lewis Venable, a New York publisher visiting Venice with the goal of getting his hands on the love letters of a poet from the 19th Century, Jeffrey Ashton. The passionate letters were betwen Ashton and Juliana Bordereau.
Venable, under an assumed name, rents a room in the Bordereau house, a kind of grand guignol, dark place. Juliana (Moorhead) by this time is 105 years old and a recluse. She is being cared for by a niece, Tina, a woman who never smiles and is very strict. She obviously does not want Venable in the house. However, the family needs the money.
One night he hears music from somewhere in the house. Walking through the garden, he finally traces it to the embodiment of the young Juliana, a graceful woman with beautiful red hair falling around her shoulders, and she is wearing a beautiful gown It's Tina, who somehow steps into the past and becomes Juliana when she enters the room. To her, he is Jeffrey.
The family priest (Cianelli) warns Venable to ne careful rather than distroy Tina's loose hold on reality. But Venable wants those letters; he wants to know where they're hidden, and he plans on taking them.
I really enjoyed this. Robert Cummings is a lightweight and wrong for this - I would have loved to have seen Tyrone Power do it - but Susan Hayward was excellent in a dual role, and very beautiful.
'The Lost Moment' is worth watching - not too bad of a film. It's a romantic-drama (with a bit of a mystery and with a dash of thriller). I was hoping for a bit more with the ending I guess because I was left with a disappointed feeling at the end of the film.
Lewis Venable (Robert Cummings) is a publisher and he is after the love letters of an early-19th-century poet, Jeffrey Ashton, to his beloved Juliana Borderau (Agnes Moorehead). Lewis pretends to be a writer and rents a room from Juliana Borderau in hopes to gain the love letters. Juliana has a niece named Tina Bordereau (Susan Hayward). Tina has a split-personality: her real self, Tina, and that of her aunt Juliana. Tina thinks she is her aunt Juliana from time to time. Lewis finds himself in a mystery surround Juliana, Tina, and the love letters of Jeffrey Ashton.
I enjoyed the film - I was just disappointed with the ending because we never got a real explanation about Tina - an explanation for the split in her personality.
7/10
Lewis Venable (Robert Cummings) is a publisher and he is after the love letters of an early-19th-century poet, Jeffrey Ashton, to his beloved Juliana Borderau (Agnes Moorehead). Lewis pretends to be a writer and rents a room from Juliana Borderau in hopes to gain the love letters. Juliana has a niece named Tina Bordereau (Susan Hayward). Tina has a split-personality: her real self, Tina, and that of her aunt Juliana. Tina thinks she is her aunt Juliana from time to time. Lewis finds himself in a mystery surround Juliana, Tina, and the love letters of Jeffrey Ashton.
I enjoyed the film - I was just disappointed with the ending because we never got a real explanation about Tina - an explanation for the split in her personality.
7/10
- Rainey-Dawn
- Apr 23, 2015
- Permalink
This little film is bursting with atmosphere, brooding, wistful, corrupt, overflowing with decay, betrayal and regret. A studio better known for its westerns and horror movies is here responsible for a major gem of delicacy and suggestion.
What makes all this remarkable is that the screenplay is a classic example of Hollywood's idiotic dumbing-down of a major work of fiction, Henry James's novella "The Aspern Papers" (based in turn on the life of Lord Byron). To compare James's brief story with the film is so sad it's almost painful, yet the movie survives and succeeds through sensitive style and sturdy professionalism.
The studio sets are evocative of a time before Venice became an international theme park, and the director's experience in radio drama provides a more finely-judged soundtrack than was the norm.
If your nerve-endings are not already terminally blunted through today's cinematic overkill, this film will prove richly rewarding.
What makes all this remarkable is that the screenplay is a classic example of Hollywood's idiotic dumbing-down of a major work of fiction, Henry James's novella "The Aspern Papers" (based in turn on the life of Lord Byron). To compare James's brief story with the film is so sad it's almost painful, yet the movie survives and succeeds through sensitive style and sturdy professionalism.
The studio sets are evocative of a time before Venice became an international theme park, and the director's experience in radio drama provides a more finely-judged soundtrack than was the norm.
If your nerve-endings are not already terminally blunted through today's cinematic overkill, this film will prove richly rewarding.
- tonstant viewer
- Feb 9, 2002
- Permalink
American publisher Robert Cummings is in Venice. He is tracking down love letters written by a long-dead poet to his lover -- played by Agnes Moorhead with a creaky voice and made up as a horrific-looking 105. He inserts himself into her household as an aspiring novelist and searches for the letters. It's not only Miss Moorhead he must deal with, but Susan Hayward, Moorhead's.... great-niece? .... who during the day is a cold piece of work, but at night puts down her hair and believes she is her aunt, and Cummings is her lover.
Director Martin Gabel had never appeared in a movie before this, and never directed another. It contains the usual spooky-house look and lighting that Henry James' ponderous "The Aspern Letters", which I had to slog my weary way through in college, seems to demand, at least given the rather Gothic adaptation of the script. Apparently James had written it based on a story he had heard about about love letters that Shelley had written to Claire Clairmont -- who also had an affair with Byron, producing a daughter.
Some of the casting choices seem odd nowadays; making up Agnes Moorhead as a 105-year-old woman must have required hours in makeup, and the charm of Robert Cummings is lost on me; he always seemed to be acting, so his acting as an unscrupulous publisher acting the part of an aspiring novelist seems, except for a very few moments, rather monotonous. Still, the backlot Venice on view for a minute or two, and the lushness of the production and music score add a richness to this movie that Hollywood could impart when Tinseltown was dealing with an important work.
Director Martin Gabel had never appeared in a movie before this, and never directed another. It contains the usual spooky-house look and lighting that Henry James' ponderous "The Aspern Letters", which I had to slog my weary way through in college, seems to demand, at least given the rather Gothic adaptation of the script. Apparently James had written it based on a story he had heard about about love letters that Shelley had written to Claire Clairmont -- who also had an affair with Byron, producing a daughter.
Some of the casting choices seem odd nowadays; making up Agnes Moorhead as a 105-year-old woman must have required hours in makeup, and the charm of Robert Cummings is lost on me; he always seemed to be acting, so his acting as an unscrupulous publisher acting the part of an aspiring novelist seems, except for a very few moments, rather monotonous. Still, the backlot Venice on view for a minute or two, and the lushness of the production and music score add a richness to this movie that Hollywood could impart when Tinseltown was dealing with an important work.
I know I read this movie's source novella by Henry James many, many years ago and remember being intrigued by it then. As usual, for a movie adaptation, Hollywood made some changes to it, especially the ending, but otherwise I really enjoyed this Gothic-noir feature.
Robert Cummings plays the American publisher who's come all the way to Venice to try to track down and acquire the private love letters written by a long-dead famous poet, for Henry Ashton read Shelley or some other equivalent Romantic poet who came to a sticky end. It turns out that the object of the poet's affection, Juliana Borderau, played by an almost unrecognisable Agnes Moorehead, is still alive, if only just, living in seclusion in a rambling old house in the company of her very protective young ward Tina, played by Susan Hayward and also an Italian mother and daughter as household attendants.
Cummings wheedles his way into the affections of the young Italian maid before being granted an audience with Barrymore. She knows she's not long for this earth and suspecting his real motives, puts a high price on the letters, perhaps half-hoping to deter him in his search.
It all takes a turn for the weird when one night Cummings hears some haunting piano music from somewhere else in the house. He follows his ears and the household cat to the source and is amazed to find himself stepping back in time to encounter a younger version of Hayward at the keyboard. When he returns to the present, he finds the initially frosty Hayward has now warmed to him, although she is unaware of his ulterior motive in being there. So now he's conflicted between his desire to get his hands on the precious letters and his growing feelings for Hayward.
It somehow seemed appropriate to me that the film literally goes up in flames at the conclusion bringing to an end a very well made and genuinely suspenseful movie. Director Martin Gabel I'd not heard of before but he sure knows how to create an atmosphere, smartly inserting little shock moments to keep the viewer on their toes. Cummings was once criticised by Hitchcock, no less, for having too jovial a face to carry off serious parts but he's perfectly fine here even if he's outshone by the alluring Hayward and the versatile Moorehead.
On the strength of this, it's rather a pity that this director didn't get a shot at James's other great ghost story "The Turn of the Screw".
Robert Cummings plays the American publisher who's come all the way to Venice to try to track down and acquire the private love letters written by a long-dead famous poet, for Henry Ashton read Shelley or some other equivalent Romantic poet who came to a sticky end. It turns out that the object of the poet's affection, Juliana Borderau, played by an almost unrecognisable Agnes Moorehead, is still alive, if only just, living in seclusion in a rambling old house in the company of her very protective young ward Tina, played by Susan Hayward and also an Italian mother and daughter as household attendants.
Cummings wheedles his way into the affections of the young Italian maid before being granted an audience with Barrymore. She knows she's not long for this earth and suspecting his real motives, puts a high price on the letters, perhaps half-hoping to deter him in his search.
It all takes a turn for the weird when one night Cummings hears some haunting piano music from somewhere else in the house. He follows his ears and the household cat to the source and is amazed to find himself stepping back in time to encounter a younger version of Hayward at the keyboard. When he returns to the present, he finds the initially frosty Hayward has now warmed to him, although she is unaware of his ulterior motive in being there. So now he's conflicted between his desire to get his hands on the precious letters and his growing feelings for Hayward.
It somehow seemed appropriate to me that the film literally goes up in flames at the conclusion bringing to an end a very well made and genuinely suspenseful movie. Director Martin Gabel I'd not heard of before but he sure knows how to create an atmosphere, smartly inserting little shock moments to keep the viewer on their toes. Cummings was once criticised by Hitchcock, no less, for having too jovial a face to carry off serious parts but he's perfectly fine here even if he's outshone by the alluring Hayward and the versatile Moorehead.
On the strength of this, it's rather a pity that this director didn't get a shot at James's other great ghost story "The Turn of the Screw".
- mark.waltz
- Jun 22, 2012
- Permalink
- theowinthrop
- Nov 2, 2005
- Permalink
Desperate to buy love letters from a famous 19th century poet to his lover, a publisher discovers that she is now 105 and living in Venice. After an introduction he rents rooms in her house but her schizophrenic great-niece obstructs his search for the letters.
Atmospheric film which captures the mood intended but the storyline is somewhat slow. Robert Cummings stars as the publisher but is outshone by Susan Hayward as the girl, for whom he falls. Honours, however, go to Agnes Moorehead who is unrecognisable as the old lady.
Atmospheric film which captures the mood intended but the storyline is somewhat slow. Robert Cummings stars as the publisher but is outshone by Susan Hayward as the girl, for whom he falls. Honours, however, go to Agnes Moorehead who is unrecognisable as the old lady.
- russjones-80887
- Sep 30, 2020
- Permalink
As the great Frank Sinatra song says, "if you could survive to 105 look at all you'll derive out of being alive". Well in The Lost Moment Agnes Moorehead does survive to that advanced age, but she truly looks like she's not deriving much from her continued existence.
The Lost Moment casts Robert Cummings as a book publisher who goes to Venice on a mission to get some rumored love letters of a famed poet who mysteriously disappeared in the last century. The great love of his life was Agnes Moorehead and she's survived him considerably. She lives in a decaying mansion with a many generations removed niece played by Susan Hayward.
Cummings comes there with a ruse to rent a room from the ladies who are in genteel poverty, not that Moorehead is exactly a spendthrift at this point. Cummings pretends he's a writer trying to soak up some Gothic atmosphere, but he wants those letters to publish. The late poet wrote some of the best romantic words ever and these would be a find. Like a lost play of Shakespeare.
The film is based on a Henry James novel and James would have to wait a bit for The Heiress for one of his works to get a really great screen interpretation. Everyone tries hard, but the emphasis in this film is on atmosphere and that seems to overwhelm the players.
However fans of Cummings, Hayward, and Moorehead will approve.
The Lost Moment casts Robert Cummings as a book publisher who goes to Venice on a mission to get some rumored love letters of a famed poet who mysteriously disappeared in the last century. The great love of his life was Agnes Moorehead and she's survived him considerably. She lives in a decaying mansion with a many generations removed niece played by Susan Hayward.
Cummings comes there with a ruse to rent a room from the ladies who are in genteel poverty, not that Moorehead is exactly a spendthrift at this point. Cummings pretends he's a writer trying to soak up some Gothic atmosphere, but he wants those letters to publish. The late poet wrote some of the best romantic words ever and these would be a find. Like a lost play of Shakespeare.
The film is based on a Henry James novel and James would have to wait a bit for The Heiress for one of his works to get a really great screen interpretation. Everyone tries hard, but the emphasis in this film is on atmosphere and that seems to overwhelm the players.
However fans of Cummings, Hayward, and Moorehead will approve.
- bkoganbing
- May 24, 2013
- Permalink
The Lost Moment (1947)
A highly romanticized version of the dark and complex story by Henry James called the Aspern Papers. It's glorious in many ways, ultra moody and mysterious. It lacks some of the delirious gloss and superb acting of, say, "Rebecca" though the similarities are clear.
The leading actor, an American in Venice, is maybe the weakest link, because he comes off as more of a naive innocent than a slightly lost and duplicitous conniver, one who gets seduced by his own mission (a common James theme). But Robert Cummings has the advantage of letting the story and the scenes dominate. The leading woman, playing a complex role, is Susan Hayward, a better actor though the main side of her role is to be steely and lifeless, which she does very well. Agnes Moorehead plays the old woman, and you won't recognize her, she's so heavily made up.
It's 1947 and still the studio era, so the entire film was shot in Hollywood, but the sets are fabulous, and the photography and lighting makes the most of it. It's beautiful, above all.
But what about the story? A great and somewhat fantastic love story. Or is it so fantastic? It seems some of the time that there is something magical happening, a crossing of time zones. But our protagonist discovers the truth, and falls in love, and the problem gradually changes. The original goal, of discovering some key lover letters from fifty years earlier, seems secondary, though it rears its head (suddenly) at the climax.
Some people might find this film "old fashioned" or a little false, somehow, with the actors playing types rather than real people. I mean, they are convincing, and compelling for sure, but they only have the qualities needed for the plot. But other people will be able to buy into all this as style, which it is, and let it take over. It's a curious and beautiful enterprise, whatever its flaws.
A highly romanticized version of the dark and complex story by Henry James called the Aspern Papers. It's glorious in many ways, ultra moody and mysterious. It lacks some of the delirious gloss and superb acting of, say, "Rebecca" though the similarities are clear.
The leading actor, an American in Venice, is maybe the weakest link, because he comes off as more of a naive innocent than a slightly lost and duplicitous conniver, one who gets seduced by his own mission (a common James theme). But Robert Cummings has the advantage of letting the story and the scenes dominate. The leading woman, playing a complex role, is Susan Hayward, a better actor though the main side of her role is to be steely and lifeless, which she does very well. Agnes Moorehead plays the old woman, and you won't recognize her, she's so heavily made up.
It's 1947 and still the studio era, so the entire film was shot in Hollywood, but the sets are fabulous, and the photography and lighting makes the most of it. It's beautiful, above all.
But what about the story? A great and somewhat fantastic love story. Or is it so fantastic? It seems some of the time that there is something magical happening, a crossing of time zones. But our protagonist discovers the truth, and falls in love, and the problem gradually changes. The original goal, of discovering some key lover letters from fifty years earlier, seems secondary, though it rears its head (suddenly) at the climax.
Some people might find this film "old fashioned" or a little false, somehow, with the actors playing types rather than real people. I mean, they are convincing, and compelling for sure, but they only have the qualities needed for the plot. But other people will be able to buy into all this as style, which it is, and let it take over. It's a curious and beautiful enterprise, whatever its flaws.
- secondtake
- Jul 13, 2011
- Permalink
Henry James' masterful novella 'The Aspern Papers', inspired by the love letters of Shelley to Claire Clairmont, has here been given the classic Hollywood treatment, that is to say it has acquired a new title, been altered out of all recognition, is utterly devoid of its author's psychological depth, robbed of his finely wrought dialogue, peopled by one-dimensional characters who bear little or no resemblance to those in the original and has opted for purely sensationalist elements.
This is actor Martin Gabel's one and only stab at directing a film and he is blessed to have the services of one of Hollywood's finest cinematographers Hal Mohr who provides oodles of atmosphere whilst legendary Alexander Golitzen is responsible for the art direction. Mr. Gabel and his cast do their best with the material at their disposal. The character played by an impassive Robert Cummings is never delineated in the novella so one can give his casting the benefit of the doubt whereas Susan Hayward as Tina Bordereau is a much glamorised version of James' tremulous, middle-aged spinster and Agnes Moorhead's withered Juliana is far more sympathetic than the greedy and domineering ancient relic of the author's imagining. The makers have also invented a distinctly non-Jamesean villain played by John Archer and thrown in for good measure Eduardo Ciannelli as a priest.
Subsequent versions although truer to James' text are all alas unsatisfactory in their way and as for screen adaptations of his other works, William Wyler's 'The Heiress' is the only one, for this viewer at any rate, that ticks all the boxes.
This is actor Martin Gabel's one and only stab at directing a film and he is blessed to have the services of one of Hollywood's finest cinematographers Hal Mohr who provides oodles of atmosphere whilst legendary Alexander Golitzen is responsible for the art direction. Mr. Gabel and his cast do their best with the material at their disposal. The character played by an impassive Robert Cummings is never delineated in the novella so one can give his casting the benefit of the doubt whereas Susan Hayward as Tina Bordereau is a much glamorised version of James' tremulous, middle-aged spinster and Agnes Moorhead's withered Juliana is far more sympathetic than the greedy and domineering ancient relic of the author's imagining. The makers have also invented a distinctly non-Jamesean villain played by John Archer and thrown in for good measure Eduardo Ciannelli as a priest.
Subsequent versions although truer to James' text are all alas unsatisfactory in their way and as for screen adaptations of his other works, William Wyler's 'The Heiress' is the only one, for this viewer at any rate, that ticks all the boxes.
- brogmiller
- May 31, 2023
- Permalink
Robert Cummings is a literary publisher who would love to get his hands on the lost love letters of a famous fictional poet. The recipient of the letters is still alive, but at 105 years old, she's a recluse in her Venice home. Bob travels to Venice, pretending to be a mere lodger in their home, but secretly hoping to find the letters, steal them, and then publish them. The woman's young niece, Susan Hayward, is extremely strict, cold, and suspicious of Bob. There's definitely something strange about the house, which was the last place the poet was seen alive. . .
The Lost Moment is definitely creepy, a film to be added to Halloween movie nights for those of you who don't partake in the blood-and-guts franchises. Agnes Moorehead plays the old woman, and for most of the film, all you see of her are her ancient, gnarled hands. She's filmed in shadows or from behind, but the expression on Bob's face shows how decrepit and horrifying she must look. There's such an element of mystery and spookiness about the house, from the moment Susan Hayward opens the door. Prepare to get goosebumps! You won't know who to trust, or what they're hiding. For fans of Suzy, she looks very beautiful in this one; it'll come as no surprise she vied for Scarlett O'Hara!
The Lost Moment is definitely creepy, a film to be added to Halloween movie nights for those of you who don't partake in the blood-and-guts franchises. Agnes Moorehead plays the old woman, and for most of the film, all you see of her are her ancient, gnarled hands. She's filmed in shadows or from behind, but the expression on Bob's face shows how decrepit and horrifying she must look. There's such an element of mystery and spookiness about the house, from the moment Susan Hayward opens the door. Prepare to get goosebumps! You won't know who to trust, or what they're hiding. For fans of Suzy, she looks very beautiful in this one; it'll come as no surprise she vied for Scarlett O'Hara!
- HotToastyRag
- Oct 28, 2017
- Permalink
I now own this movie and can say it basically still stands up for me as an adult, with the caveat that I first saw it as a child, when it seemed wonderfully mysterious to me. Seeing it recently did not have quite the same effect, but I still enjoyed it very much. One reason is that as an adult I fell in love with Venice and found it to be the most beautiful and colorful of cities, whereas the film, though set in Venice, is dark and noirish. I am sure that has affected my appreciation of this movie. That aside, it is still an effective romantic mystery and manages not to be a tear-jerker. I loved Robert Cummings, both in movies and on TV, and this is one of his best. There was just something about those old-time actors that the new generation(s), by and large, seem to lack. I think maybe the old guys took their work more seriously and maybe the new guys are only interested in the big bucks, nose candy, fast cars, and you fill in the blanks.
- negevoli-44
- Jun 29, 2000
- Permalink
Robert Cummings (Lewis) is a crafty so-and-so. He's after some love letters that will make him a fortune and he's fully prepared to trick his way into their possession. However, we find that he does have a heart after all.
Susan Hayward (Tina) is a nutjob whilst Agnes Moorhead (Juliana) is the knowing old aunt. The setting of the film is memorable but the story is familiar. It combines elements of other films and there is no real surprise. It is ok entertainment but just lacking a scary twist.
Susan Hayward (Tina) is a nutjob whilst Agnes Moorhead (Juliana) is the knowing old aunt. The setting of the film is memorable but the story is familiar. It combines elements of other films and there is no real surprise. It is ok entertainment but just lacking a scary twist.
Very loosely based on "The Aspern Papers" by Henry James, it involves a publisher, Lewis Venable (Robert Cummings), who is obsessed with getting control of and publishing the love letters of poet Jeffrey Ashton, who disappeared in Venice decades ago. The love letters had allegedly been written to Juliana Bordereau, still living in Venice, now very elderly to the point that she cannot move from her chair and claims she never sleeps. Having written to Juliana, she claims that the letters do not exist, but Lewis is not satisfied. So he comes to the Bordereau household under a false name claiming to be a novelist who wants to write his next work in their home because of its atmosphere. The Bordereaus exact a steep price for the rent, but Lewis agrees to it. It seems like this would tip off the Bordereaus to possible ulterior motives, but I digress.
The house is largely dark and very uninviting, as is Juliana's niece, Tina (Susan Hayward), who runs the household with an iron fist and is too young to be an actual niece of Juliana's since Tina is only in her 20s. The rudeness and even latent anger of Tina, the weird piano music that plays at night from an unknown location, the haunting score, and even the fact that Tina, when signing the lease agreement with Lewis, signs for both herself and Juliana simultaneously, and does so with completely different handwriting, really stirred my interest. But then the explanations arrive and it is all very ordinary.
Still it is very atmospheric, and it was a new experience to see Joan Loring, often playing cocky cockneys, give a performance as a housekeeper in perpetual terror of Tina.
The house is largely dark and very uninviting, as is Juliana's niece, Tina (Susan Hayward), who runs the household with an iron fist and is too young to be an actual niece of Juliana's since Tina is only in her 20s. The rudeness and even latent anger of Tina, the weird piano music that plays at night from an unknown location, the haunting score, and even the fact that Tina, when signing the lease agreement with Lewis, signs for both herself and Juliana simultaneously, and does so with completely different handwriting, really stirred my interest. But then the explanations arrive and it is all very ordinary.
Still it is very atmospheric, and it was a new experience to see Joan Loring, often playing cocky cockneys, give a performance as a housekeeper in perpetual terror of Tina.
When opportunistic publisher "Lewis Venable" (Robert Cummings) sets out to track down some long-lost love letters from recently re-discovered poet "Jeffrey Ashton", he ends up in a Dickensian-style mansion house where the writer's former mistress, the very elderly "Juliana" (an almost unrecognisable Agnes Moorhead) dressed in black, sits in her chair most of the time with frustrated daughter "Tina" (Susan Hayward) tightly wound up living the life of a caged bird. Rather than come clean about his motives, "Venable" poses as a novelist to ingratiate himself with the women - but soon, is embroiled in a complex intrigue involving the two ladies and the letters. Hayward is super - she exudes an eeriness and almost schizophrenic charisma as the young woman who seems caught in a time loop unsure as to whether she is "Tina" or her own mother. The haunting music from Daniele Amfitheatrof (and a tiny bit of Caruso too) helps build the tension carefully and effectively as the significance of the letters becomes more evident and poignant to the predicament of the women - and increasingly, their guest. Cummings is OK, he has an innate blandness about him to watch, but he has a good script to work with and good to foil to act with, and the pot stays boiling til very near the end.
- CinemaSerf
- Jan 7, 2023
- Permalink
The muse of the great American poet Jeffrey Ashton (1797-1843) was his beloved Juliana Bordereau: they spent lovely moments at her palace in Venice, where the love-letters of Ashton should still be kept. American publisher Lewis Venable sniffs a best-seller item so he moves (presumabily in 1947, release date of the movie) to the gloomy Bordereau residence trying to find the letters and publish them.
Here, Venable meets the lady of the house, a Juliana Bordereau, aged 105 - who couldn't evidently have been Ashton's lover -, and her niece Tina. During the nights, Tina, dressed in old-fashioned dress, plays the piano in an abandoned wing of the palace, and immedesimates herself with Juliana (the poet's lover before 1843). Venable himself immedesimates with Ashton, and the two have a love-affair. No problem, they also have a love-affair during the day, when no one of them remembers what was happening in the nights.
Lulled by venetian gondoliers singing (neapolitan) songs, old Juliana Bordereau tells Venable that Tina uses to take her own identity, and, to top it all off, Juliana adds that she herself (Juliana, I mean) takes the identity of Rosa, an old house-keeper, nowhere to be seen or mentioned elsewhere in the film
Now... you get the idea?
Here, Venable meets the lady of the house, a Juliana Bordereau, aged 105 - who couldn't evidently have been Ashton's lover -, and her niece Tina. During the nights, Tina, dressed in old-fashioned dress, plays the piano in an abandoned wing of the palace, and immedesimates herself with Juliana (the poet's lover before 1843). Venable himself immedesimates with Ashton, and the two have a love-affair. No problem, they also have a love-affair during the day, when no one of them remembers what was happening in the nights.
Lulled by venetian gondoliers singing (neapolitan) songs, old Juliana Bordereau tells Venable that Tina uses to take her own identity, and, to top it all off, Juliana adds that she herself (Juliana, I mean) takes the identity of Rosa, an old house-keeper, nowhere to be seen or mentioned elsewhere in the film
Now... you get the idea?
- daviuquintultimate
- Mar 27, 2023
- Permalink
Publisher Robert Cummings is searching for love letters by a famous poet and writer. Agnes Moorehead was the objet d'amour in question. In his quest, he takes the cover of looking for a place to rent. As they are in need of money to keep their old homeplace and to keep away inevitable change, Agnes and daughter Susan Hayward charge an exorbitant amount, but he desperately agrees. In this otherworldly, haunting, and Gothic film, much of the film's appeal is its atmosphere and mood. But this has much to recommend it, the cast alone to begin with. In fact, this is one of those movies that film buffs go crazy over - the cast, the time and place, the search for love letters, the grasping for answers for things unexplainable. A true field day that delivers everything. Also, something else that was made a to-do over is the makeup Agnes Moorehead wears in this film that makes her look over 100 years old. Her subtle and understated performance gives the viewer just enough to want more. This was actor Martin Gabel's sole directorial effort, based on a Henry James novel. It was an exceptional tour-de-force for all and a true movie experience to behold. But what happens, you ask? It's just beyond your reach. We'll always keep reaching for things unattainable. The place has a hold on its inhabitants and the film has a hold on you. Don't you hear it? It's calling you....
- JLRMovieReviews
- Sep 14, 2014
- Permalink
This was better than i expected. A good drama/mystery movie with an original script, well written and well acted, especially Susan Hayward : So beautiful and so charismatic actress.
Of course, it is still a 1947 movie, so it's a bit pompous and definitely outdated. Still a breath of fresh air if you think about all those trash movies and tv shows of the last 5 years. Characters were likeable and magnetic, i empathized with them. Movies' mysteries made me curious to see where it goes. Of course, you should be a romantic soul in order to enjoy this. IMDB synopsis is crystal clear. If you read it and decide this is worth watching, be sure that you made the right choice. If you think it's a bit silly, then skip it.
It's not a great movie and some things didn't even make much sense but i enjoyed it all the way.
Of course, it is still a 1947 movie, so it's a bit pompous and definitely outdated. Still a breath of fresh air if you think about all those trash movies and tv shows of the last 5 years. Characters were likeable and magnetic, i empathized with them. Movies' mysteries made me curious to see where it goes. Of course, you should be a romantic soul in order to enjoy this. IMDB synopsis is crystal clear. If you read it and decide this is worth watching, be sure that you made the right choice. If you think it's a bit silly, then skip it.
It's not a great movie and some things didn't even make much sense but i enjoyed it all the way.
- athanasiosze
- Jun 4, 2024
- Permalink
New York publisher Lewis Venable (Robert Cummings) travels to Venice to acquire the lost love letters of poet Jeffrey Ashton. He rents a room from Ashton's former lover elderly Juliana Bordereau (Agnes Moorehead) and her niece Tina (Susan Hayward). They need money. One night, he finds the normally hard Tina with her hair loose and playing the piano. She seems to think that she's Juliana in love with Ashton. She doesn't remember the next morning. Juliana reveals that Tina sometimes loses herself believing Juliana as the hated maid Rosa.
Robert Cummings is rather stiff and he is exceeded by Susan Hayward's stoneface acting. When her character changes, she becomes the embodiment of melodramatic romantic acting. This kind of acting make it impossible to develop chemistry for the two leads. There is some atmospherics but there is little tension. Everybody is so mannered.
Robert Cummings is rather stiff and he is exceeded by Susan Hayward's stoneface acting. When her character changes, she becomes the embodiment of melodramatic romantic acting. This kind of acting make it impossible to develop chemistry for the two leads. There is some atmospherics but there is little tension. Everybody is so mannered.
- SnoopyStyle
- Jul 5, 2015
- Permalink