A count who ignores an infatuated secretary thinks he has met his match when an angel from Heaven shows up.A count who ignores an infatuated secretary thinks he has met his match when an angel from Heaven shows up.A count who ignores an infatuated secretary thinks he has met his match when an angel from Heaven shows up.
Ruth Adler
- Knight #1
- (uncredited)
Luis Alberni
- Jean Frederique
- (uncredited)
Rafael Alcayde
- Berti
- (uncredited)
Maude Allen
- Gossiper #3 at Reception
- (uncredited)
Sig Arno
- Waiter with Champagne
- (uncredited)
Evelyn Atchinson
- Marie Antoinette
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaOriginally planned as a vehicle for Jeanette MacDonald 10 years earlier, but the somewhat racy content put the musical on hold at MGM, until it was a hit on Broadway in 1938.
- GoofsWhen the count (Nelson Eddy) removes the feathers from his wife's new hat, the feathers are a different type and color, and attached differently, from the feathers on the hat shown to his wife (Jeanette MacDonald) seconds before.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Nelson and Jeanette (1992)
- SoundtracksI Married an Angel
(1938)
Music by Richard Rodgers
Added music by Herbert Stothart
Lyrics by Lorenz Hart
Added lyrics by Bob Wright and Chet Forrest
Played during the opening credits
Sung by Jeanette MacDonald
Reprised by Jeanette MacDonald and Nelson Eddy often
Played also as background music
Featured review
One used to say, concerning Nathaniel Hawthorne, that his failures were more interesting than his successes. I believe that the same remark could suit to McDonald-Eddy's pictures. And especially this one.
It apparently possesses many characteristics of a failed movie: it's kitsch, the script, because of censorship, sounds inconsistent Yet, this movie gets also some good points: good Rodgers-Hart's music ("I married an angel", "Tira tira tira la"), good acting with E.E.Horton and Reginald Owen.
Anyway, if you may dislike it, you can't forget it. This strange movie actually leaves a very strong, dreamlike, impression, and you are very likely to keep it in mind for days, maybe for weeks. Why? In the thirties and the beginning of the forties, movies didn't have the same mean than today: it aimed, like a dream, to divert the public in order to make it forget a difficult reality. Of all the the dream-movies that was made, in that time, this one stands as particularly powerful.
In short, let's say that the better way to appreciate this movie, is to watch it without wondering whether it's good or bad. To watch it, like you would watch a dream.
It apparently possesses many characteristics of a failed movie: it's kitsch, the script, because of censorship, sounds inconsistent Yet, this movie gets also some good points: good Rodgers-Hart's music ("I married an angel", "Tira tira tira la"), good acting with E.E.Horton and Reginald Owen.
Anyway, if you may dislike it, you can't forget it. This strange movie actually leaves a very strong, dreamlike, impression, and you are very likely to keep it in mind for days, maybe for weeks. Why? In the thirties and the beginning of the forties, movies didn't have the same mean than today: it aimed, like a dream, to divert the public in order to make it forget a difficult reality. Of all the the dream-movies that was made, in that time, this one stands as particularly powerful.
In short, let's say that the better way to appreciate this movie, is to watch it without wondering whether it's good or bad. To watch it, like you would watch a dream.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Hon var en ängel
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 24 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content