Talk:Paisley Underground

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rock music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Music/Music genres task force Paisley Underground is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles

Another L.A. band I remember in this genre was the Plimsouls. They were a throwback to the Stones. Not very psychedelic in the acid sense, but they sounded a lot like the Stones and Jefferson Airplane and the Kinks. Surprised they don't get mentioned here... (by the by they also titled one of their albums "Children Of Nuggets: Original Artyfacts From The Second Psychedelic Era 1976-1996")

For a sample see: http://www.ilike.com/artist/The+Plimsouls/most_played_songs --Smilo Don (talk) 05:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paging @Koavf: @SteveStrummer: I don't want to get into an edit war with the recent IP editor who incorrectly adds R.E.M. as a significant influence in this article. I figured you two would take an interest in the R.E.M. related revisionist history here. His source barely mentions R.E.M. and the mention doesn't support his claim; definitely undue weight in the lede. Thanks. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Never mind. Assuming a series of edits that I've made today remains in place, I think I've improved the article and its references in such a way that the mention of R.E.M. is OK now. Not really necessary, but acceptable in context. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job, and I'm glad you thought to include Dunedin! I think the new lead works well, although the parallel-genres info needs to be restated somewhere in the body, preferably with additional sources. Thanks for your work on this, SteveStrummer (talk) 23:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paisley Underground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.davis80smusic.com/davis80smusic%20steve%20wynn%20interview.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2008/may/13/rememberingtherainparade

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. by Lwarrenwiki (talk) 17:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]