User talk:75.108.94.227

• lastmod: User_talk:75.108.94.227 at 2015-12-09 @ 14:57 Z
• modWas: 8 years ago , based on page-reload at 2024-10-18 @ 10:14 Z
• version: mediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.27 (d521558)

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

File:OstrichHead.JPG

This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

We may, however, get a non admin next year. But what I would prefer is that decent and broadly based editors perform the task regardless of whether or not they are admins. There is nothing special about janitorial supplies. I have created a thing linked from my user page about why I will not be one. You probably understand this since you will not get an account. The questions are the same in each case, and, while important to the questioner, are not to the questionee.

Missed? I think not. No-one is missed on Wikipedia. If our esteemed founder upped and left we would not turn a hair. Unless we were Trump, of course. He turns several. I have the time to remain in the AfC pond, certainly in the shallow end. It is the extra time that I allocated that is curtailed. The former is fun, the latter is a kind of duty. If I would have had to cut down on th pleasant pastime to perform only the duty then the duty would soon become intolerable. We must always keep a balance. unsigned message from Timtrent ... reply still open in some other tab ... too many tabs! :-)

	Mandy, it's blowing!!!
	Mandy, it's blowing!!! Hafspajen (talk) 17:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• HI!! Hihi! Good bye! (A classic), see North's page. Hafspajen (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, nice goblet. But Mandy, how do you drink, without getting a little lizard up your nostril?  :-)     75.108.94.227 (talk) 11:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OH, lost my teaparty - nice to know it got in where it should be. OH, no, no lizzards, uhuuuhuh. WHY only the lead? Hafspajen (talk) 12:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy lazy , in the daisies , lolly-gag lolly-gag , all the way home  :-)     There is your reason, you brutal taskmaster!  ;-)     I also managed to mess up the infobox, though, that should count for something.... 75.108.94.227 (talk) 13:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MEEE?? Brutal? I am crying. We now can be proud, and chill out now, it's not blowing any more. Just be happy with the hard work. And hope and glory. Hafspajen (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are a delightful person, except when you are sending me and agent nejapsfaH out on some kind of a Mission! Then you turn from happy-nice-polite scandinavian artist-type, into Vicious Viking Va... Vu... oh crap, don't know any more good words that start with V. ...Nevermind that! Brutal indeed, vicious even!!11!! Think of all the dangerous wiki-tasks you have handed out! "Agent nejapsfaH -- take out that copyvio!" (pow zap) "Agent nejapsfaH -- somebody has sent in the WP:PEACOCK, time to cold cock it!!" (boom zing) "Agent nejapsfaH -- put some nice pictures on that page, stat!" (err...) Actually that last task is not so brutal and vicious. But the exception proves the rule, don't distract me, there is a WP:POINT to all this silly stuff, I'm sure.  ;-)     75.108.94.227 (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For your research, time, and response to the ACE template discussion. I will follow through on the links, and continue to value the input. — Ched :  ?  08:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What does the term "bangvote" mean? — Ched :  ?  15:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BANGVOTE aka WP:!VOTE. I'm actually surprised the former is a redlink!  :-)     In the case of arbcom elections, it is somewhat untrue to call it a WP:NOTVOTE, since the results *are* calculated by counting noses in supports-divided-by-sum-of-supports-and-opposes fashion with no leeway for the scrutineers to elide non-policy-backed bangvotes. But I still like to call arbcom-election-proceedings bangvoting, since it is "not voting" when compared to e.g. real world political elections. p.s. If your question was about the "bang" portion, that is programmer-speak for the exclamation-mark, see Jargon File for the putative origin of such cutesy terminology (e.g. the asterisk is 'splat' in certain circles). Specifically see sense one at http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/bang.html 75.108.94.227 (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mwuahahah I created WP:BANGVOTE, now you look crazy for suggesting it was a red link! Для Родины! -- samtar ^whisper 16:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Soviet Russia, arbcom bangvotes you!  :-)     Thanks, my friend. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:-D Thanks folks — Ched :  ?  16:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Filled out my survey. Nathan ^T 14:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. jps (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]