User talk:Lynbarn

Hello, Lynbarn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MBisanzBot (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The today article you edited isn't working right. There seems to be some sort of a caching issue with the way the page tells you the current date. When I first loaded the page it was 1 day late, but when I edited the page and clicked preview it gave me the correct date range. Refreshing the page doesn't help, only editing the page and clicking preview does.--71.194.190.179 (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to substantially whittle down the episode summary. I was working at another couple of articles, otherwise, I would have jumped on it. Lhb1239 (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was a nice improvement on the new lead. Thanks! --Pnm (talk) 01:19, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lynbarn, Automated is an official gender-neutral term used by NASA and other space companies. I like uncrewed as well. I just added a section to the article Unmanned resupply spacecraft to ask that the name be changed to Automated. Could you please join the discussion and get the name changed to either Automated or uncrewed. --Abebenjoe (talk) 00:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've added my comment to your section:) Thanks! Lynbarn (talk) 00:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:L&bCrest.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please make any comments related to the Raspberry Pi article here:

Hi. When you recently edited BBC Computer Literacy Project 2012, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IDE and Python (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

fixed (plus a few otherd the bot didn't spot!) Not seen this bot before - very useful! Lynbarn (talk) 12:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lynbarn. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amateur radio.
Message added 22:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I don't want to spam you, but I think this is important, and would like to know your opinion. Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 22:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chefham2004.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lyn locomotive may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• website|http://762club.com}} of the 762 Club - the team building a replica of the 1898 original}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Risten-Lakviks Museum Railway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• >[http://home.swipnet.se/risten-lakvik/ Museum website (in Swedish) ''retrieved 17 December 2013)'']</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rolling stock of the Lynton and Barnstaple Railway may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Restored 2006. Undergoing renovation/fitting for service use]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Woodhead Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re this, MOSNUM states:

Notes and exceptions:

• Numbers in mathematical formulae are never spelled out (3 < π < 22/7, not three < π < 22 sevenths).
• Comparable quantities should be all spelled out or all figures:

  •  five cats and thirty-two dogs, not five cats and 32 dogs.

  •  86 men and 103 women, not eighty-six men and 103 women

  •  There were 3 deaths and 206 injuries or Three died and two hundred six were injured, not There were three deaths and 206 injuries

• But adjacent quantities not comparable should usually be in different formats: twelve 90-minute volumes or 12 ninety-minute volumes, not 12 90-minute volumes or twelve ninety-minute volumes.

So while you are generally right, the series of numbers form part of the exception mentioned. Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame! 01:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know I was putting back in a bad edit earlier to the MH370 article ... the "undo" function didn't work like it should have. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 15:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the explanation - That's okay - undo does that sort of thing sometimes! :) Lynbarn (talk)[reply]

...for creating Towed pinger locator and for fixing links, etc.  ~Eric:71.20.250.51 (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For fixing that horrible Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 summary. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 02:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the guy reverted it again. Sigh. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 02:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the reference does have this line: "A memorandum of understanding on emergency response support services was signed by Tzu Chi and Malaysia Airlines in 2007, enabling Tzu Chi to provide support for family members of victims in times of crisis." [1] -- Fuzheado | Talk 13:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! thanks - I see it now -just above the photo. Thanks! Lynbarn (talk)

"Not relevant"? This is the first time an international search for an airliner has taken place in two hemispheres, to the best of my knowledge. kencf0618 (talk) 23:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

possibly, although there have been air-sea searches over the equator many times before - I remember an RAF Shackleton lost in the Indian Ocean in the 60s A friend of mine's father was lost on that occasion. It doesn't need to be in the sub-headers though. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 23:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure of your use of hypothesized either - not comonly used in British English, and I think estimated will be better understood, however, I'll leave that to other editors to consider. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lynbarn I posted my edit on the talk page as I am posting it below. If you dont want to Help me, I will release it to the international media and show wikipedia is wrong and making assumptions not factual as to how MH370 was found. Get your facts right, as I have already made Breaking news in this matter over 15 times and for more than 10 days straight.

Facts matter,not speculation, get it right or this entire page will be made a spectacle in the media as well. The following is True and Correct and needs to be applied appropriately. So plz help me as requested or be made a media spectacle for posting false information.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please be advised the MH370 page is dramatically incorrect, The inmarsat data report was incorrectly translated, A person from Pensacola, FL USA was responsible for re-translating correctly and reconverted the data in the appropriate mapping technology that is also know as the "Most creditable Lead we have" in the JACC press conferences. This individual gave approximate location as the inmarsat data was converted by him into Mapping technology and on April 8th gave the final coordinates to the JACC and prior assisted is ALL refined search area up to and identified ping location. He also was able to identify that the inmarsat Northern arc was misapplied and never existed as the arc diagram was also a mapping grid providing actual coordinates to MH370, additionally this individual also has identified the actual flight path from water entry point to the NE to North directly from Vanish point from Gulf of Thialandas showing all inmarsat data was actually a mapped diagram of distress calls monitoring MH370 from equipment malfunction or vanish point site as designed by the B777 as well as what occurred after the unknown incident causing MH370 to vanish from radar and travel from the Gulf of Thailand S to SE over Jakarta to water entry point. The Malay radar received a Radar reflection froma dramatic drop in altitude in which the B777 altimeter and Terrain mapping technology took over by default from point +0 to negative -0 by default of the geomagnetic mapping system upon default designed by the B777. Although, this information is being held closely to the vest of the JACC investigation it has all been verified by the JACC out of the respect for the families as they should be notified first and arrangements are currently being made to fly them in and discuss the memorial and wreckage questions as to their wishes for the resting place of loved ones and location of memorial and to say goodbyes from water entry point. Please advise as of additional information and to appropriate list Facts as to this matter and how MH370 was located.

(talk page stalker) Surely you can provide reliable sources that will allow our readers to verify these facts? Please do so at the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 23:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Huon, but this isn't really something I can help with - I don't have any knowledge of specific sources, but if the OP, Prose072, were to enter into discussion on the article's talk page as I suggested, maybe somebody could help. Frankly, after being threatened on my own talk page, I am rather disinclined to assist this particular editor any further. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I can restore the content to your userspace (at User:Lynbarn/CobolScript) should you wish to try and expand and bring up to notability guidelines? If this sounds acceptable please let me know. GiantSnowman 21:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please, much appreciated. Regards Lynbarn (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, seeing as this was a PROD I've restored the article in mainspace - voila. You might wish to deal with any issues to prevent it getting re-deleted. GiantSnowman 22:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I'll see what I can do with it! Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Exe (locomotive) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. No refs in > 4 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you deprodded it (which I would have done had you not got there first). It looked like a drive-by PROD anyway: the phrase "No evidence of awards, charting or ..." suggests a music album, not a railway locomotive. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redrose64, Thanks, I did wonder about the charting reference, although he does have a point. I think I'll merge this and the other similar articles into a single "Yeo Class locomotives of the Lynton & Barnstaple Railway" or similarly-named article. Regards Lynbarn (talk) 10:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edits to TS Royalist (2014) because they were in violation of WP:SHE4SHIPS. You may also be interested in the current discussion at talk:City of Adelaide (1864). Mjroots (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. Sorry, I wasn't aware of WP:SHE4SHIPS - the last time I remember looking into this on Wikipedia, I'm pretty sure the MoS suggested NOT using gender-specific terms for mechanical devices (although I may have been specifically looking at steam locomotives at the time). Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]