User talk:Gwen Gale: Difference between revisions
Onefortyone (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Onefortyone (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==Recent edit wars on Elvis-related topics== |
==Recent edit wars on Elvis-related topics== |
||
I am not so happy with the recent arbcom case, as I have been warned on my talk page, but my opponent, who was by far more disruptive, hasn't. As Checkuser has shown that User:Excelse and User:Related0877 are confirmed sockpuppets (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Excelse/Archive]) and it is likely that Excelse has also used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/182.77.82.62 this IP] in order to remove the same content, although he has explicitly claimed that they are different users (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=690078728]), I am of the opinion that the future edits of this user should be checked with care. He has only been blocked for two weeks for sockpuppetry. See also his unblock request [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Excelse here]. May I ask you to have a look at the recent removals from a neutral point of view. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Personal_relationships_of_Elvis_Presley&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Memphis_Mafia&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Adams_%28actor%29&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toilet-related_injuries_and_deaths&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Graceland&action=history]. The [[Graceland]] page may be a good starting point for reaching consensus, as [ |
I am not so happy with the recent arbcom case, as I have been warned on my talk page, but my opponent, who was by far more disruptive, hasn't. As Checkuser has shown that User:Excelse and User:Related0877 are confirmed sockpuppets (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Excelse/Archive]) and it is likely that Excelse has also used [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/182.77.82.62 this IP] in order to remove the same content, although he has explicitly claimed that they are different users (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=690078728]), I am of the opinion that the future edits of this user should be checked with care. He has only been blocked for two weeks for sockpuppetry. See also his unblock request [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Excelse here]. May I ask you to have a look at the recent removals from a neutral point of view. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Personal_relationships_of_Elvis_Presley&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Memphis_Mafia&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Adams_%28actor%29&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toilet-related_injuries_and_deaths&action=history], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Graceland&action=history]. The [[Graceland]] page may be a good starting point for reaching consensus, as [Talk:Graceland] is the only page where Excelse has cited some reliable sources in order to support his opinion. [[User:Onefortyone|Onefortyone]] ([[User talk:Onefortyone|talk]]) 14:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:25, 28 November 2015
| |
| bygone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
If I left a post on your talk page...
Please answer there. I'll see it, no worries.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit wars on Elvis-related topics
I am not so happy with the recent arbcom case, as I have been warned on my talk page, but my opponent, who was by far more disruptive, hasn't. As Checkuser has shown that User:Excelse and User:Related0877 are confirmed sockpuppets (see [1]) and it is likely that Excelse has also used this IP in order to remove the same content, although he has explicitly claimed that they are different users (see [2]), I am of the opinion that the future edits of this user should be checked with care. He has only been blocked for two weeks for sockpuppetry. See also his unblock request here. May I ask you to have a look at the recent removals from a neutral point of view. See [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The Graceland page may be a good starting point for reaching consensus, as Talk:Graceland is the only page where Excelse has cited some reliable sources in order to support his opinion. Onefortyone (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)