User talk:115ash: Difference between revisions

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Hi ash! Thanks for the welcome. I noticed many <ref> tags and links pointing to irrelevant content on many pages. Also there are { cites } which should ideally be in the ==External Links== sections, if at all. Can you please tell me how to mark them for review by admins/more experienced editors? TechXcell (talk) 05:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TechXcell! Sorry for not having responded earlier. Nevertheless, you can edit or delete the unrelated contents and links on your own. It isn't really required to mark them for review by reviewers or skilled contributors. If you have any difficulty, let me know or you might ask help here. I also suggest you to create your own userpage. --115ash^→(☏) 08:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Used Wikipedia for years, but never contributed before. Finding my way round the protocols - thanks for your welcome and I hope to contribute more in the future.Bedford67 (talk) 09:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not used to this, and so I appreciate any help you could give me. An editor indicated that my new citations on the Andrew R. Heinze page were messed up. I'm not sure what is wrong with them, but it's probably something for sure. Maybe I should have answered the person who flagged them, but I don't know if that's the way I should do it (and I don't know how to do that anyway). I DID read all about how to do all this stuff, but it seems so mysterious, I couldn't for the life of me figure it out. Thanks so much.EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @EastDimeBoxFrank. Most of your references were independent sources. Please read --> WP:RELY. I recommend you to create a new section to Talk:Andrew R. Heinze, so the problems may be resolved. --115ash^→(☏) 14:57, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (I couldn't figure out how to put your name in here), Thanks for your comment. I just did as you suggested and created a new section on the Andrew R Heinze talk page. As I said on that new talk section, I feel bad about messing up the Andrew R Heinze Wiki article because it didn't have flags on it before I added the new citations. An article with flags on it looks bad. (I guess it's true, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it.") In any event, now I want to make it good. So... can I take my mistakes one by one (on that talk page) and correct each one? You said that most of my references were independent sources... that's good, right? EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right now I am improving a bunch of the sources on Andrew R. Heinze... including sources that came from other people. They were probably good once, but when I looked, they were dead. EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 115ash, Could we move our conversation about improving the Andrew R. Heinze sources to the article talkpage? That way I won't miss anything. I just found out that would be a helpful thing for me to do. EastDimeBoxFrank (talk) 23:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I just wanted to say a quick hello and to tell you that I'm moving ahead and learning a lot from some wonderful Wiki editors. DimeBoxFrank (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any problem, don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! --115ash^→(☏) 13:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 115ash,

I need help in getting a photo I have already uploaded into Wikipedia Commons to show up on a Wikipedia page.

The page is for Leif Erland Andersson, planetary astronomer. It may be only because I have not yet been registered for ten days.

Thanks, Antynome112233 (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Antynome112233, as Ip 62.107.222.74 said, you forgot ".jpg" and "File". However, it wasn't enough. That article contains a lot of mistakes, and it must include the infobox. --115ash^→(☏) 09:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome !- I set up a complete new page about the story of a church ( all facts) and have been deleted for advertising, I have enquired of the person that deleted the page so I can review and correct, bit harsh as this is my very first go at Wiki and I cant see how the history of Church is advertising ! but perhaps this is the process to go through to learn how it all works but thanks to you for the welcome! Basilcat1 (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that works. I have. Been away for a couple of months, in the process of organising a remove to the other side of the planet. My library is at present somewhere on the high seas. I approach Wikipedia with a sense of trepidation after an absence. Leonardo da Vinci is a particular target. It is always good to return and find articles not simply intact but genuinely improved. Amandajm (talk) 02:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HEY I want you to became an administrator join a new community of smart =) http://fakpedia.ucoz.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikael Makzon (talk • contribs) 09:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ash

Thanks for Welcoming me and also giving me some tips. :)

Hope I learn more from you. :)

--talibong (talk) 09:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ash

Can you help me regarding the article that I created. It says it requires notability. Can you explain and help me to make it more informative and pass general guidelines.

Thank You.

--talibong (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @talibong. I just edited that article, which seems to be written as an advertisement. Someone can even nominate it for deletion. Try to find and add some reliable sources. --115ash^→(☏)

Hi Ash

Thanks for the help. I will rewrite this one.

Regards --talibong (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ash I have updated the ikoala page by adding more infos and business model. Can you have a look on it. Thanks

Regards --talibong (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Here User:RightCowLeftCoast asked me for assistance regarding what he described as "a potentially disruptive editor", speaking of your edits which are the topic of this talk page section. I have not looked at the edits themselves, but I do see (UTC times)

• 15:25, October 20, 2014‎: last of a series of five unexplained edits to the article by you
• 06:12, October 23, 2014: a revert by RightCowLeftCoast, saying "reverted bold edits per WP:BRD; no consensus to radically alter lead or infobox, lead and infobox represent all significant/largest population Asian American populations; edits had given undue weight to South Asian Americans"
• 08:36, October 23, 2014‎: last of a series of three edits by you with individual explanatory summaries
• 19:25, October 24, 2014‎ reversion by RightCowLeftCoast, saying "reverted bold change, no consensus on talk page, see consensus built here Talk:Asian American/Archive 7#Infobox ethnicity representatives)
• 19:31, October 24, 2014: creation of a talk page section by RightCowLeftCoast, at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes with initial content explaining his objections to your edits and asking that you discusss the matter there and not begin an edit war
• 19:33, October 24, 2014: an invitation here (above) by RightCowLeftCoast for you to join a discussion at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes
• 11:26, November 3, 2014: last of a series of three edits by you (two explained, one not)
• 00:08, November 4, 2014‎: revertion by RightCowLeftCoast, saying "reverted bold change, no consensus on talk page, see consensus built here Talk:Asian American/Archive 7#Infobox ethnicity representatives"
• 00:21, November 4, 2014: Request for assistance on my talk page RightCowLeftCoast

I have fumbled around a bit putting that timeline together, but I think I have it right. Please discuss this at Talk:Asian American#Radical infobox changes to build a consensus for your desired changes.

Please note, without accusing anyone of amything, I ask that both editors involved here review Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#Characteristics of problem editors. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo! Nice summary and one worth gazing in a figurative "objectivity" mirror! At any given time we can all plunge fromr objectivity, a fact based world, into passion or special pleading. It is to be feared! Palmeira (talk) 04:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

I created a page for architect/scholar A. Lawrence Kocher and it's now pending review. Is there any way I could get someone to check it out while I'm waiting, so I can continue to improve and edit the page?

Thanks so much! Lufiona14 (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lufiona14. That article is good enough and it has been created. Now you can start to ameliorate it. 115ash^→(☏) 11:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome!! Thanks! --Lufiona14 (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 115ash, I just created another page for a firm called STUDIO V Architecture. I have the same question - any way I could get feedback while I'm waiting in queue so I can continue to improve and edit my page? Thanks so much! Lufiona14 (talk) 23:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lufiona14. That article is better than the previous one, it contains several reliable sources. I think you could create it directly. However, something need to be improved. As regards this "Jay Valgora", it had to be created separately. I don't know why you have submitted it alongside "STUDIO V Architecture". 115ash^→(☏) 15:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 115ash -- Hm I actually only intended to create STUDIO V Architecture (Not the Jay Valgora) at this time, so posting only STUDIO V would be great. Could you tell me how to create it directly? I asked the wiki chatroom a few days ago but couldn't figure it out. Thanks again, so much! Lufiona14 (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just click here, and then you'll understand.115ash^→(☏) 12:28, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi so as I'm working on this article/biography of a popstar when I preview it, it doesn't look the it's suppose to please help!!!--Byron Carmello Inc (talk) 11:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Byron Carmello Inc That article should be improved. Click here 115ash^→(☏) 14:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ash

I have updated my topic Ikoala but still got errors. Can you help me to fix that

Regards

--talibong (talk) 09:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm slogging my way through, one at a time. Just discovered that one of them lit out for the California gold fields in '49 and became a well-known pioneer (and legislator) out there. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 115ash. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom (Beast Quest).
Message added 13:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

how to make my userpage like you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey786 (talk • contribs)

Hi @Mickey786. You could have a user page like my one by considering the source code of my user page, and setting it into your your. Howsoever, remember to sign you messages. 115ash^→(☏) 14:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @115ash. , I just make a newspaper article of wikipedia but now i get notifictions speddy deletion , why? this is real place and bussines you can confirm by visiting her office. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey786 (talk • contribs)

You need to add more reliable sources on that article. DO NOT forget to sign! 115ash^→(☏) 15:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend The page - Meghdad - where it is redirected to Meghdad Goharnia is a mistake is he is someone else and full name of my this person is Meghdad Mostafaei. Could you please change to Meghdad Mostafaei since I have more data from him to update the page .. Thank You! Maxmostaf (talk) 01:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)maxmostaf 1:07, 25 November 2014[reply]

Hey, just a friendly note I changed the markup/styling of your display title in /Bar to keep it from boldening the entire page. Hope this is okay :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 05:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@MusikAnimal, thanks. --115ash^→(☏) 09:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear 115ash, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Egorov Alexandre. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 15:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The article on Karl Hammer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Hammer is an excerpt from a Dutch wiki article http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Hammer_Kaatee But I can't figure out how to add this source to the English page. I noticed your contribution, so can you assist? thank you kindly Magister OFM (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Magister OFM, I am a bit unclear about what you intend to say. Where are you having problems? --115ash^→(☏) 10:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. I already figured it out. Thanks --Magister OFM (talk) 08:06, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this entry it is stated that the daily prayer is not mentioned in the Quran bit in fact Allah the Most High mentions salaat several times and refers to when they are too be offered. The specifics of how to pay were furnished in the sunnah. Surah 4:103 is just one example from the Quran. 2607:FB90:337:B0B6:1E74:9836:CFCA:2668 (talk) 04:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Abdul Wadud[reply]

Hi 115ash! I agree with your edit, I was just putting down all the information before I made it more concise, it is far too long! if you want to make it more concise please do implement the changes yourself too! Hope this collaborative effort makes great page! FilmLover91 talk) 12:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 115 Ash, Sorry to be so blunt towards the previous user who removed my post. But I am very proud about what I said, and I would love for the Internet users of the world to be aware of the physical obstacles that arise for beginners. Sorry if this seems a bit much, but I am quite hurt and mystified as to why I was not allowed to post an insightful comment. Thank you x Twerkobama (talk 14:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am welcoming you to make useful edits --115ash^→(☏) 15:37, 29 December 2014 (UTC)-[reply]

Sir, I am a war veteran cavalry officer, wounded and decorated for valour in war of which I have fought two, and have been actively involved in counter insurgency operations. I left service due to injuries sustained both during war and peace. I commanded an Armoured Regiment and resigned my commission. Part of the reason was the blatant way history was twisted with lies and half truths. List of true and unsung heroes is long. I want your views if, with the available new information from the media and now declassified information, it is time to rewrite History true to as it actually happened. You have recently removed small but very relevant changes I made on the Longowala operations and 1961 Goa Operations. regards Colonel Jai Jind (talk 15:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Colonel Jai Jind, on an encyclopedia like Wikipedia you should not include those things. The anti-vandalism tool has identified all of them as vandalism. Nevertheless. I am welcoming you to make worthwhile edits --115ash^→(☏) 16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 115ash,

Perhaps it could be better formatted to reference the comic book, but it seems appropriate to mention his newly acquired super powers under the 'powers and abilities' section. The incident of Damian fighting Kalibak with his superstrength is referenced in the plot summary in the wikipedia page.

The current write of the Batman and Robin comic book talks about Damian's new super powers in this article http://www.newsarama.com/23035-batman-robin-writer-why-he-s-back-why-with-superpowers-and-what-s-next.html

The powers will be around for at least the next few months, so I think it's worthwhile to mention them in the article.

62.31.215.203 (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You could add that reference.--115ash^→(☏) 10:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, 1962 Sino Indian war was a national disaster for India, for which Both Political and Military leaders were directly responsible. In order to cover up, they looked for Scalps from the junior leadership. The units fought under extreme hardship, specially the Tank unit that scaled the hazardous heights at great personal courage, without adequate administrative cover and Infantry support. Their rearguard action was not recognized. This needs correction, and also citations for those who laid their lives by keeping the enemy at bay and not allowing it to cut the roads at Bomdila, Chaka and Dirang Dzong. In Sino Indian war, tanks were employed under worst conditions than the epic battles of Zojila in J&K operations of 1948. In reference the book titled 'WE LEAD' by CL proudfoot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonel Jai Jind (talk • contribs) 01:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am redirecting those articles due to notability concerns. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for creating the article. I made some small edits in the article 'Mohammed Ebadur Rahman'. First of all, Mohammed is not part of his name. If you check all the cited references, nowhere he is addressed as 'Mohammed'. Secondly he writes in Bengali and English, and currently does not hold the French nationality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khkalachand (talk • contribs) 09:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seven Heartz Gaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MLG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	"The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar is awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked." Thanks for your appreciation and kind gesture. Faizan 19:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to revise the comment after, with some citation. It would be more appropriate in the NAND section. Yet it is the most aggressive use of multiple patterning, with the highest wafers per day still.219.85.224.184 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 115ash. You have new messages at OccultZone's talk page.
Message added 15:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Abfall Service AG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nate Bowie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Senior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your move of the List of French people made no sense, for more than one reason, I'm sorry to say.

First, your rationale was "This is article seems to be unnecessary, seen that Category:French people would be enough. Therefore, it's better to move to this name, rather than deleting." You misunderstand -- it is well settled at wikipedia that lists and categories are not considered redundant, even if they may cover the same articles. See, e.g., Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates.

Furthermore, if they were redundant, changing the name would not address any redundancy (but, of course, they are deemed synergistic and not redundant).

Third -- note the naming convention for similar lists. Note the absence of the word "notable" in the title. See Category:Lists of people by nationality. Please revert yourself. Tx. --Epeefleche (talk) 10:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{replyto|Epeefleche}} I went ahead and reverted that page move (along with similar ones) before reading this message; as said above, they violate the naming conventions for lists. Graham87 15:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I know exactly what a magistrate is and does. I am one. A barrister (like a solicitor) is a lawyer who represents clients. He is not a state appointee. A magistrate is a judge and is appointed by the state. You are totally wrong. Please read up on this, come to some understanding, and put it right. Meanwhile, I have marked your edit for confirmation, which you will not find, to avoid a 3RR conflict. Emeraude (talk) 13:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Are you a magistrate? Do you know the exact difference between a barrister and solicitor? Who do bring and present cases to the courts? Judges? Not. Nevertheless, as you should know, necessarily a magistrate do not have to be a lawyer. In fact, I am a magistrate too, although I don't possess any legal degree. But I won't include this--115ash^→(☏) 13:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is total bollocks. Emeraude (talk) 11:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GedUK  12:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Mate, stop editing for a while, especially reverting, 'cause you have violated the three revert rule, which is an absolute no-no even if you think that your edit was the correct one. Hear out the opposing party's POV, discuss the matter with him at the talk page of the corresponding article and reach a solution amicably. [[User:CosmicEmperor|CosmicEmperor}} you should do the same as well. – Soham (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]