User talk:Betafive: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:14, 19 August 2014

August 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Betafive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not really sure why I've been indef-blocked; doesn't seem appropriate. Requesting review by uninvolved admin. betafive 19:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block reason was rather clear and I am sure you understood correctly why you are blocked. Just to be completely explicit: your constant bickering and fighting about really minor things, amount to disruptive editing. As you don't seem to get the message: Unblock request denied. Regarding your continued wikilawyering in the section just below: stop that or your talk page access will also be removed. Randykitty (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you just miss that part where I requested review by an uninvolved admin? I understand why I've been blocked; I'm asking that it not be an indef block. betafive 19:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue why you think that diff indicates that I am involved. Apart from giving you a few warnings, I don't think I have interacted with you and I don't consider myself involved. Feel free, though, to file another unblock request. I'll let another admin tell you the same thing. --Randykitty (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, sorry, I had the wrong diff in my copy/paste buffer. betafive 19:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, so as I said, I gave you a warning. That doesn't make me involved at all. And I didn't advice you to file another request "such that it can be reviewed by a truly uninvolved admin", just another admin. --Randykitty (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting WP:UNINVOLVED: In general, editors should not act as administrators in disputed cases in which they have been involved. This is because involved administrators may have, or may be seen as having, a conflict of interest in disputes they have been a party to or have strong feelings about.

Given the above diff and the edit summary in this one, it appears that you have strong feelings about me, and hence are involved. betafive 20:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless, I don't consider myself involved and no matter how much you try pocking a fight with me, I remain uninvolved. Yjis kind of wikilawyering is not helping your case. --Randykitty (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Betafive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Randykitty suggested (above) that I refile my unblock request such that it can be reviewed by a truly uninvolved admin. To reiterate: it is my opinion that an indef block is inappropriately punitive.

Decline reason:

An indefinite block is just that, indefinite. The block could be forever or it could last for a couple of hours. If you genuinely wish to be unblocked, you need to address your conduct and the comments made here. The length of the block is the lesser concern right now. As long as you appeal in a civil and appropriate manner, I wouldn't worry about revocation of your talk page access. Mike V • Talk 20:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Betafive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will be less argumentative, I will take User:Writ_Keeper's advice, and I will stop ironically templating the regulars.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I will be less argumentative, I will take [[User:Writ_Keeper]]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADrmies&diff=621932262&oldid=621922576 advice], and I will stop ironically templating the regulars. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will be less argumentative, I will take [[User:Writ_Keeper]]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADrmies&diff=621932262&oldid=621922576 advice], and I will stop ironically templating the regulars. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will be less argumentative, I will take [[User:Writ_Keeper]]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADrmies&diff=621932262&oldid=621922576 advice], and I will stop ironically templating the regulars. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Revision as of 23:14, 19 August 2014 edit Betafive (talk \| contribs) 454 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:14, 19 August 2014 edit undo Betafive (talk \| contribs) 454 edits unblock request Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:
	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=[[User:Randykitty]] suggested (above) that I refile my unblock request such that it can be reviewed by a truly [[WP:UNINVOLVED\|uninvolved]] admin. To reiterate: it is my opinion that an indef block is inappropriately [[WP:PUNITIVE\|punitive]]. \| decline = An indefinite block is just that, indefinite. The block could be forever or it could last for a couple of hours. If you genuinely wish to be unblocked, you need to address your conduct and the comments made here. The length of the block is the lesser concern right now. As long as you appeal in a civil and appropriate manner, I wouldn't worry about revocation of your talk page access. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> [[User:Mike V\|<font color="#151B54">'''Mike V'''</font>]] • [[User_talk:Mike V\|<font color="#C16C16">'''Talk'''</font>]]</span> 20:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed \| 1=[[User:Randykitty]] suggested (above) that I refile my unblock request such that it can be reviewed by a truly [[WP:UNINVOLVED\|uninvolved]] admin. To reiterate: it is my opinion that an indef block is inappropriately [[WP:PUNITIVE\|punitive]]. \| decline = An indefinite block is just that, indefinite. The block could be forever or it could last for a couple of hours. If you genuinely wish to be unblocked, you need to address your conduct and the comments made here. The length of the block is the lesser concern right now. As long as you appeal in a civil and appropriate manner, I wouldn't worry about revocation of your talk page access. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> [[User:Mike V\|<font color="#151B54">'''Mike V'''</font>]] • [[User_talk:Mike V\|<font color="#C16C16">'''Talk'''</font>]]</span> 20:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)}}

	{{unblock\|I will be less argumentative, I will take [[User:Writ_Keeper]]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADrmies&diff=621932262&oldid=621922576 advice], and I will stop ironically templating the regulars.}}		{{unblock\|I will be less argumentative, I will take [[User:Writ_Keeper]]'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADrmies&diff=621932262&oldid=621922576 advice], and I will stop ironically templating the regulars.}}