User talk:Hiding: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:10, 14 June 2009

NOTE I'm getting grouchy. My first response may not be my true response. I'm also getting terse. I'll happily clarify. I'm working on it.

This talk page is automatically archived by Miszabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User_talk:Hiding/Archive 2024. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Thanks for the redirect

It is that article,but I disagree with the current name it should be called fata mosque bombing,FATA is arge area,it just like saying 2009 Punjab sri Lankan team attack.will discuss on article talk page.yousaf465'

Graphic novel Delisted

An article you significantly contributed too, Graphic novel, has been delisted as a Good Article following an individual WP:GAR as part of the GA project quality task force GA Sweeps effort. This reasons this article was delisted have been detailed at Talk:Graphic novel/GA1. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Word before last.

Hello,

I was looking at an edit you made to the game Word Before last [[1]], where you reverted an edit by a user, stating that only one word should be played at a time.

You're welcome to correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears that the user only added one word to each game, and placed two words to start a new game, both of which are allowed. I originated the game a couple of years ago so I've clarified the rules to say that users should only place one word per game.

Thanks,

Knaw (talk) 23:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 It is that article,but I disagree with the current name it should be called fata mosque bombing,FATA is arge area,it just like saying 2009 Punjab sri Lankan team attack.will discuss on article talk page.[[User:yousaf465|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9B30FF">'''yousaf465'</span>]][[User talk:yousaf|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#63B8FF"></span>]]
-== Fict mediation ==
-I just don't think mediation is an appropriate tool in this case. I think we need to face the reality that fiction notability, as such, is a no consensus issue. [[User:Phil Sandifer|Phil Sandifer]] ([[User talk:Phil Sandifer|talk]]) 13:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
-:I don't think an [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Notability and fiction|RFC]] to get mediation is appropriate either. It seems to me you are attempting to escalate the discussion, but without a constructive proposal to justify this flapping arround, this will lead nowhere. --[[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin Collins]] ([[User talk:Gavin.collins#top|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Gavin.collins|contribs)]] 12:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
-::Once again I politely request you stop your character assassination and your attempts to second guess me.  Please learn to comment on the content rather than the user. [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 12:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
-:::I am commenting on the content of the RFC. There is no proposal contained in it that would requires any change to [[WP:FICT]]. --[[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin Collins]] ([[User talk:Gavin.collins#top|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Gavin.collins|contribs)]] 13:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
-::::Your words belie the truth of the statement "I am commenting on the content of the RFC": "It seems to me you are attempting to escalate the discussion" and "this flapping arround". Like I say, comment on the content rather than the user, or don't comment at all. If you are unable to refrain from commenting on the user, I will consider re-factoring your comments in line with guidance. Thanks.  [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 13:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 == [[Graphic novel]] Delisted ==