User talk:StarHOG: Difference between revisions

Archives

1

Nice job fixing up the trek articles!! Live long and prosper, Qapla'! Starspotter (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. One more episode and I'll be done with season 2. I wish there was more stuff on the production of each episode. I bought at auction a few years ago some production memos from Bob Justman to Gene Roddenberry about "The Enemy Within" and they are a fantastic read, I am sure notes and memos were probably sent for all the episodes if only we had access to them all electronically.@Starspotter: StarHOG (Talk) 20:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the ref you broke with this edit wasn't the YouTube clip, but rather the Encyclopedia reference used elsewhere in the article. Fortunately, a few hours later a bot came by and corrected the error. --EEMIV (talk) 00:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Cheick Sanou, from its old location at User:StarHOG/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance ^{talk/contribs} 22:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheick Sanou, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mahveotm (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm pleased you like my additions to The Empath page. All the info I added comes from the same chapter in the book (These Are The Voyages TOS: Season Three), although I felt it might be confusing and unnecessary to include specific page numbers. Yes, I tried to simplify and use my own words, rather than just lift them directly from the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeywa (talk • contribs) 18:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

" ... it first aired on September 8, 1966" is literally incorrect, and the addition I made to indicate that September 8, 1966 was its first airing in the US was not redundant, despite the earlier mention of Star Trek being an American show. The knowledge that it is an American show does not automatically impart knowledge that the show actually first aired in Canada two days before, which isn't mentioned until two paragraphs later. Kubrickrules (talk)

Discussions about an article's content should be held on that article's talk page. Let's move it there, please. StarHOG (Talk) 16:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Abby Johnson (activist), you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Easy there, I'm the one trying to make your watered-down statements into something neutral. Yes, I used pro-choice and I recognize that was an error, but your warning is bullying and frowned upon by Wikipedia. StarHOG (Talk) 15:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your attempts at compromise. Elizium23 (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for posting this warning, and I do not intend to intimidate or bully you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StarHOG-

I have obtained copies of the Paramount Television Daily Production Reports from the UCLA library special collections (Roddenberry collection) for Star Trek production no. 60043-58 (originally titled “The Paleface” when filmed but changed a month later to “The Paradise Syndrome.” These reports state that this episode was filmed either on the Gower stages (June 11, 17, 18, 1968) or at Upper Franklin Canyon (June 12-14, 1968). It was not filmed at the Hollywood reservoir. I’ll be making a correction to the Wikipedia production section to this effect as the issue is now definitively settled.

Best,

— Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfanson (talk • contribs) 23:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jfanson (talk) 23:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Hello, StarHOG-[reply]

I have obtained copies of the Paramount Television Daily Production Reports from the UCLA library special collections (Roddenberry collection) for Star Trek production no. 60043-58 (originally titled “The Paleface” when filmed but changed a month later to “The Paradise Syndrome.” These reports state that this episode was filmed either on the Gower stages (June 11, 17, 18, 1968) or at Upper Franklin Canyon (June 12-14, 1968). It was not filmed at the Hollywood reservoir. I’ll be making a correction to the Wikipedia production section to this effect as the issue is now definitively settled.

Best,

— Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfanson (talk • contribs) 23:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm moving this discussion to the episode's Talk page in hopes other editors may have some references that can help resolve this. StarHOG (Talk) 14:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what I wrote on Talk:Addiction:

Note: I moved my response to StarHOG's reply to this RfC because I think they (StarHOG) has a good point about the purpose of an RfC (see below, "I came to this page as a result of an RfC ..."). My intention is to keep their (StarHOG's) RfC reply "pure" so to speak and move the debate, which they did not seek, down here.

Are you okay with my edit (diff) wherein I moved the "debate" text down to General Discussion? - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 02:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get the information that "Mudd's Women" is the sixth episode of Star Trek? It is the seventh episode on Netflix, so if you are right then Netflix has for some reason inserted something else into the sequence, perhaps a later episode which they have decided to move, which seems very odd. JBW (talk) 11:49, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has now occurred to me that Netflix may have included a pilot episode. I'll check when I get a chance. JBW (talk) 12:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have now confirmed that Netflix counted a pilot as episode one, and then the subsequent episodes were all pushed back by one. Not a helpful way to do it, in my opinion. JBW (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Netflix isn't responsible for documenting which episodes were aired first or being helpful in this regard. That's not their job. I'm glad you figured this out on your own and that you did some fact finding and research about it. A lot of people come onto wikipedia and change the episode numbers because of Netflix! Thanks for working it out and understanding. Some people aren't as inquisitive as you are! And please don't let this dissuade you from making edits on Star Trek articles that you find fault with. I get things wrong all the time. StarHOG (Talk) 22:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, of course they aren't "responsible" for documenting which episodes were aired first, but I still think it would be less likely to cause confusion if what they called, for example, "episode 1" were what everybody else calls "episode 1". They could give the pilot some other name than "episode 1", such as, perhaps, "pilot episode". JBW (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...and perhaps the most important point of all is thank you for correcting my mistake. JBW (talk) 20:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Climb (2023 TV show). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Climb (2023 TV show), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gross National Product (Comedy group). Thanks! Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gross National Product (Comedy group) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StarHOG! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]