Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 January 30: Difference between revisions

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: changed to fair use without prejudice if anyone would like to nominate it at IFD or another fair use review process. --B (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:JovinPoliceSketch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Open availablity does not mean it's not copyright, However I can see this might qualify as fair use, it being released by an official law enforcement body connected with the relevant case Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The entire reason a law enforcement agency releases a public sketch is because they want the public to see it and help solve a murder. I can't think of any better example of fair use.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Most yearbooks didn't follow formalities at all in this time period, let alone renew them. I would be very surprised to find this was renewed. Anyone with contrary evidence may of course present it in a new discussion. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marrs High School.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• All items are generally copyright unless some other exemption applies.

Would a yearbook be considered Not-Renewed? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_September_5#File:Aldine_High_School_Facade_1961.jpg where the uploader said in a discussion about another photo from another yearbook in the same school district that the yearbook had no copyright notice. I'm betting $eleventy billion that if a 1961 yearbook from this school district lacked a copyright notice, a 1940 yearbook didn't have one either. --B (talk) 22:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• There is presumably no commercial value in a high school yearbook 28 years after it was published, so regardless of whether it has a copyright notice or not, it is very unlikely that the copyright was renewed. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI, I sent an email to this user asking them to check for a copyright notice on the yearbooks in question. (I'm batting o'fer on my recent efforts to email uploaders in some of the deletion backlogs, though, so I wouldn't hold my breath for a reply.) --B (talk) 23:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corbet family emblem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I am not aware of English Heratige releasing images under a 'free' license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Seven Words from the Cross in a Church Bulletin for a Good Friday Tenebrae Service (Faith Lutheran Church).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Whilst the hymn is public domain, I'm not so sure about a particular typesetting... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visual Collaborative.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derived photo of 2D artwork,no indication of statuys of Artists work vs photo of it. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SYMBOL BELTATREZ.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo, above threshold of originallity. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henricoflag.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Flag design is not own work of uploader.... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 16:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarasidle.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like a screenshot or promotional pic, I fail to see how it can be CC-BY-SA. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, this pic it's from a Sara Sidle promotional pic from Season Five of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, I edited the file with more information of Source and their use. These pics are important to do more visual the article of the fictional character. --DM-AVENGER (talk) 11:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Obviously non-free, and it seems to meet WP:NFCC. I've changed the licence to non-free. The image already has a fair use rationale, although the rationale looks a bit messy and might need some cleanup. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Optik.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is clearly a screenshot of a UI , No indication Telus released this under a free license Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maidenerlegh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly a logo, so I'm skeptical about the GFDL claim... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:LakeManapouri-PowerStationDiagram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a musuem display... The photo is derivative of it... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:KRL Model College logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly a logo, so I am skeptical about the self claim. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shanaya Fastje portrait.Jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIF data does not support iPhone claim. Found similar images on Google (crops of this image). Eeekster (talk) 03:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aloha and thanks for your concern this picture belongs to AMB publicity in other words, to myself. It was edited and now in circulation apparently after being deleted the first time in late 2012 I have released it to the public on the creative commons and would like to use it for the wiki if this is not acceptable please let me know and I will create a new photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mishka7 (talk • contribs) 09:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The EXIF does not say what camera model the photographer used. Image editing software sometimes remove the EXIF, so that is perfectly natura. Due to the other images elsewhere on the Internet, I think that you should send an e-mail to OTRS to prove that you are the copyright holder to the photo. See WP:IOWN for instructions. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Audrey Bitoni 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Watermarked image which the uploader claims they have permission to post but have not supplied it. Dismas|^(talk) 04:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 16:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of Maury County Tennessee.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is highly unlikely to have been created before 1923. Probably it should have another license type and a fair-use rationale. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alton Shops flagpole.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a plaque from 2002 in the United States. See Commons:Template:Drfop. Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ripper Crew Mugshots.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source is {{bsr}}, so it isn't possible to tell whether the mugshot was taken by the federal government or by a state government. One of the men was executed at Tamms Correctional Center which appears to be state-run, suggesting that the mugshots might not be federal works. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xpressions 2011 saw Lucky Ali enthrall the audience with some of his best numbers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lucky ali.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michie Hospital Staff.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to the licence, this was published before 1923, but there is no evidence of publication. Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skyrim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image looks like character artwork, Artist signature in bottom right of image does not match uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 17:10, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conifer High Lobo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Too complex for PD-textlogo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azrieli model.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is not the creator of the model shown. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto-Hahn-Medal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No indication given that uploader owns right in the medal design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhotoshoppedShep2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like it's a retouched version of computer game artwork, no indication of where it's from, or if the uploader owns the rights in the source. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonic Reality Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is clearly a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This should be acceptable under a fair use claim. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This is a logo owned by Dave Kerzner, the owner of the company Sonic Reality. It is his property, and has given permission for it to be used for the Wiki article. --Carter336 (talk) 9:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.93.11 (talk)

Do you have confirmation of that in a form that can be put on the talk page?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rutherford museum christchurch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is poster art, and as such there is not usally FoP for 2D works.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • What does FoP mean? I took this photo myself, but of course I didn't design the $100 bill or the poster. Yogi de (talk) 09:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: I now read up on Freedom of panorama and if I understand it correctly, this photo may indeed be unfree in some countries because I don't hold the copyright to the poster itself (I only took the photo of it). What do I need to do, delete the image from Wikipedia? It appears that it's currently unreferenced, anyway. Yogi de (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • FoP = freedom of panorama. In some countries, you are allowed to take photos of copyrighted buildings, statues, posters and other works without permission from the copyright holder, and that's what we call freedom of panorama. In other countries, you can't take photos of such works. For example, this section mentions a lawsuit where the US post was fined for depicting a national monument on a stamp without permission from the sculptor, and this newspaper article mentions a lawsuit where a Korean bank was fined for depicting a building without permission from the architect. The image in this nomination appears to have been taken in New Zeeland. The copyright law of New Zealand allows you to take photos of most copyrighted 3D works such as buildings and statues, but you can usually not take photos of 2D works, and posters are not OK. Thus, delete. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MartinJuan2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User has never met Juan, therefore cannot be the photographer. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fun at Center Stage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Also here in smaller resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZZ Ward at Vinyl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Also here in smaller resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.