View source for Talk:Raffles Junior College

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 50.17.0.0/16 has been blocked by ‪JJMC89‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 05:21, 2 April 2025. Your current IP address is 50.17.108.138.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
This IP address range has been globally blocked.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

This block affects editing on all Wikimedia wikis.
The IP address or range 50.17.0.0/16 has been globally blocked by ‪AmandaNP‬ for the following reason(s):

No open proxies

This block will expire on 17:15, 2 November 2026. Your current IP address is 50.17.108.138.

Even while globally blocked, you will usually still be able to edit pages on Meta-Wiki.

If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

Other useful links: Global blocks · Help:I have been blocked

You can view and copy the source of this page:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Schools|importance=Mid|needs-infobox=no}}
{{WikiProject Singapore|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{Old merge full |otherpage= Raffles Institution (Secondary)|date=January 2011 |result= '''Do not merge''' |talk=Talk:Raffles Institution (Secondary)#Time to merge?}}

{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[Stamford Raffles#Coat of arms|Raffles coat of arms]]</nowiki>  The anchor (#Coat of arms) is no longer available because it was [[Special:Diff/407807481|deleted by a user]] before. <!-- {"title":"Coat of arms","appear":{"revid":330645609,"parentid":329926766,"timestamp":"2009-12-09T10:52:02Z","replaced_anchors":{"Coat of Arms":"Coat of arms"},"removed_section_titles":["Coat of Arms"],"added_section_titles":["Coat of arms"]},"disappear":{"revid":407807481,"parentid":405497571,"timestamp":"2011-01-14T08:04:33Z","removed_section_titles":["Coat of arms"],"added_section_titles":[]}} -->
}}

==Notable Alumni==

The Venerable Shi Ming Yi is currently under trial in the Subordinate Courts of Singapore
 
on charges of conspiracy, misuse of funds and forgery. Should he still be listed even if he is "notable" in a negative sense?

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi_Ming_Yi#cite_note-2  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/218.186.12.230|218.186.12.230]] ([[User talk:218.186.12.230|talk]]) 14:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->



==Redundant info==

Following is info which i deem redundant for the Wikipedia purpose, and which i have therefore removed:

===Under Facilities section===

'''Block A'''<br>
Lecture Theatre 3 (200 Seats)<br>
39 Tutorial Rooms<br>
AV Projection Room<br>
MEP Room<br>
Music Library<br>
Theatre Study Room<br>

'''Block B'''<br>
Lecture Theatre 4 (200 Seats)<br>
Lecture Theatre 5 (200 Seats)<br>
14 Tutorial Rooms<br>

'''Block C'''<br>
Lecture Theatre 1 (850 Seats)<br>
Lecture Theatre 2 (350 Seats)<br>
6 Tutorial Rooms<br>
Amphitheatre<br>

'''Block D'''<br>
10 Seminar Rooms<br>
8 Computer Laboratories<br>
14 "Chat Rooms"<br>

'''Block E'''<br>
6 Physics Laboratories<br>
6 Chemistry Laboratories<br>
4 Biology Laboratories<br>
Life Science Laboratory<br>
Research Laboratory<br>
Project Workroom<br>
Students' Council Room<br>
Bookshop<br>

'''Block F'''<br>
Parade Square<br>
Canteen<br>

'''Block G'''<br>
Tennis Courts<br>
Basketball Courts<br>
Indoor Rifle Range<br>

'''Block H'''<br>
General Office<br>
Deans/HODs Office<br>
Staff Room<br>
Media Resource Library<br>

'''Block J'''<br>
Performance Arts Centre (396 Seats)<br>
Lecture Theatre 6 (200 Seats)<br>
4 Seminar Rooms<br>

'''Block K'''<br>
Indoor Sports Hall<br>
Dance Studio<br>
Chamber Ensemble Room<br>

'''Block L'''<br>
Multi Purpose Hall<br>
Health Fitness Studio<br>
Chinese Orchestra Room<br>
CCA Rooms<br>
Spectators Gallery<br>
Track and Field<br>

===Under Students' Council section===

The 25th Students' Council was officially invested into office on 18 May 2005 with fifty-two elected individuals taking over the roles held by the 24th Students' Council. The councillors were elected into office by their peers after a vigorous week-long campaigning process involving speeches, posters, bio-data boards and display boards in the amphitheatre.

Executive Committee of 25th Students' Council<br>
President: Zhang Junli<br>
Vice-president: Amanda Zain<br>
Secretary: Daryl Poon<br>
Treasurer: He Kangya<br>
Communications Department Head: Senthilkumaran S/o Sabapathy<br>
Welfare Head: Junghans Tasani<br>
CCA Department Head: Mohd Ilman

--[[User:Plastictv|Plastictv]] 04:01, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

== Wee Shu Min ==
See archived page at [[/Wee Shu Min Inclusion Debate]].

There does not seem to be a consensus that we are heading towards, I have archived the discussion as it was taking up a whole lot of space on the main talk page. If you must, post new points below this post.  - [[User:Fiveless|fiveless]] 16:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
* A consensus has been reached to include, under "Notable Alumni" - [[User:Fiveless|fiveless]] 09:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Till now, ryand's silence on my point (1) and (3) which I reproduced below is deafening :

1) Your offer to work together being civil, which everybody know is the case, and it is what every body is doing here (or else probably you will see all sorts of foul languages being used). However, you still did not address the issue of why it should be your version that remains until a consensus is reached? By always insisting that your version should be the standing version until a consensus is reached, I am not sure if it is the "consensus" way. So why not delete AC from RGS page until a consensus is reached?

2)Thanks for pointing out that "notable" can be used in a negative way, I learned something new today. Do you care to give me the name of the linguist?

3) Back to my point above, since there is no consensus on AC case, then why not delete AC from RGS page until a consensus is reached? [[User:Icecold1|icecold1]] 03:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

:Why are you still ''on'' about this? Anyway, take the issue up on the RGS talk page if you're that bored. It doesn't belong on this page. -[[User:Ryan-D|'''<span style="color:#4e6172;">ryan</span>''']][[User:Ryan-D/Talk|'''''<span style="color:#92906b;">d</span>''''']] 09:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

That is because your silence on this is deafening.......[[User:Icecold1|icecold1]] 01:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Whoever deleted the WSM inclusion, please stop doing that.This only contribute to the impression that RJC is trying to whitewash the whole episode.

By the way, ryand has still not reply to my point above either over here or in RGS page. [[User:Icecold1|icecold1]] 03:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
:That ''might'' have been because I've been away in Taiwan for the past week or so, if you'd bothered to check my user page. At any rate, I didn't reply to your points because I thought the incident had already been settled. Wee Shu Min's in the article, under the notable alumni section. I'll address your point on Annabel Chong on the RGS talk page, but I'm not expecting the discussion to go anywhere. -[[User:Ryan-D|'''<span style="color:#4e6172;">ryan</span>''']][[User:Ryan-D/Talk|'''''<span style="color:#92906b;">d</span>''''']] 19:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

::Whatever Wee Shu Min did, it has absolutely no relation to the article. Why then do we not include her in the article [[Singapore]], just because she is a Singaporean? Or should we not include her in [[girl]], because she is a girl? Why do we not include her in the article [[elitism]], because it is an elitist statement? Is it not the same as including it in this article just because she is a student of this school? ''[[WP:POINT|Disclamer: Please do not edit the articles to include this.]]'' --[[Special:Contributions/165.21.155.91|165.21.155.91]] ([[User talk:165.21.155.91|talk]]) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

== Time to clean up the article ==

It is rather difficult to read the article on RJC. The article is not comprehensive enough unlike that of [[Raffles Institution]] and it is not coherent enough. I think that we should start to re-organise the materials in there and add in more facts to make it more detailed. It is rather embarrassing that the standard of this article cannot match up with that of RI! --[[User:Russianroulette2004|Russianroulette2004]] 14:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
:While I agree with the coherence (the article needs to be tidied up a bit), it most certainly does ''not'' need to be cluttered with useless information like the RI article. Any expansion of the article should focus on verifiable things like the history of the college, and all information added need to be [[WP:V|sourced]]. -[[User:Ryan-D|'''<span style="color:#4e6172;">ryan</span>''']][[User:Ryan-D/Talk|'''''<span style="color:#92906b;">d</span>''''']] 15:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
::Haha maybe not the standard of the article on RI as of now. It was pretty good if memory serves me but currently they have added too much stuff on facilities. Who in the world really bothers on the nitty-gritty of the Hall or Boarding Complex! I think we need slightly more description on facilities and tiding up on the culture of RJC. --[[User:Russianroulette2004|Russianroulette2004]] 11:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

== Inappropriate tone and style ==
when reading the article i get the impression that parts of it are written by disgruntled college students or non-college students. There is a personal tone to the article which is most unencyclopediac. Statements such as "At present, Moor-Tarbet has the most number of points but the competition is fierce" would better be replaced by "___ were the first ever house champions in 2005".
The "notable alumni" section also appears to be written by a politically ignorant person.
[[User:121.6.201.152|121.6.201.152]] 11:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

:Please sign up as a user and identify yourself on the talk page so as to avoid vandalism. Anyway you mention a good point and that the tone in most sections of this article is inappropriate. I made a little amendments to the Student Council section, and I hope to make the other parts of the article as objective as possible. --[[User:Russianroulette2004|Russianroulette2004]] 14:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This article seems to be fine and good in terms of providing the bare facts of the school and its operating system - but one wonders if the tone of the article is slightly biased in favour of the RJC school administration. Changes to reflect the operational difficulties of the air-conditioning system has been constantly deleted - even though effort has been made such that each successive edit has become more watered-down in tone and neutral. While the article needs to remain objective, one wonders if this comes at the expense of reflecting commonly held school opinions - would it be permissible to list certain criticisms of the student council for instance?

:Yes, if we had citations. Aha. '''[[User:Ariedartin|Ariedartin JECJY]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Ariedartin|Talk]]</sup> 16:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
== WikiProject class rating==
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 10:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

== Removal of content ==

Content under the "Recent News" section on the page [[Raffles Junior College]] is un-encyclopaedic. '''[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia Is Not#Wikipedia Is Not A Directory|Wikipedia is not a directory]]'''. The actions of certain individuals of the school should ''not'' be included as they were ''not sanctioned'' by the school, nor did they take place during the course of school events, nor did they occur within the school premises.

In fact, the only link is between the events in the "Recent News" section and the school is that they happen to be students of the school in question at the time that event occured. --[[Special:Contributions/121.7.32.204|121.7.32.204]] ([[User talk:121.7.32.204|talk]]) 15:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

== dead link / inappropriate citation ==

'A' Level Results
In the 2007 Revised GCE A Level Examination, Raffles Junior College's first cohort of Raffles Programme students did exceedingly well with about three in four students scoring distinctions in at least 3 content subjects while about one in two scored distinctions in at least 4 content subjects. In addition, RJC produced 6 top students scoring the maximum of 9 distinctions in the examination. [4].

and

The first batch of Raffles Programme students received their A Level results on 7 Mar 2008. They have done exceedingly well. [9]

This information is lifted directly from the RJC website itself. The citations are linked to pages on RJC's own website: http://www.rjc.edu.sg/newrjc/admin/document/TopStoryForWebsite2.pdf
http://www.rjc.edu.sg/newrjc/admin/document/TopStoryForWebsite5.pdf
(both dead links)

I believe that an organization is not its own impartial judge. Using RJC's own website as a citation for proof of RJC performing "exceedingly well" (a phrasing which in itself carries certain implications) is akin to stating that Apple Inc is doing well and using a website on Apple's own homepage to confirm that. The judge of whether RJC has performed well or not cannot be RJC itself, '''[[WP:SOAP|Wikipedia is not a soapbox.]]''' See [[WP:Conflict_of_interest#Examples]] for more details.

Furthermore, the citations lead to dead links.

I believe that inclusion of these paragraphs is in violation of existing Wikipedia policies and have hence taken steps to remove it. The batch of 2005 achieved about two in three students scoring distinctions in at least 4 content subjects - the batch of 2007 clearly pales in comparism. I do not have a citation for this, but I need not have one. 


'''It is true that three in four students scored distinctions in at least 3 content subjects while about one in two scored distinctions in at least 4 content subjects and that RJC produced 6 top students scoring the maximum of 9 distinctions in the examination. However, this does not conclusively prove that RJC did exceedingly well (compared to who? against which benchmark? even the phrase is loaded with ambiguity akin to an advert.)''' The point i am trying to prove is that a clear citation from an unbiased source (e.g. MOE, Singapore or a Singaporean newspaper / research agency) is needed to confirm the fact that Raffles Junior College did "exceedingly well". Unless one can provide me that citation (which, for obvious reasons, should NOT come from the Raffles website), such wording is akin to advertisement, and is in violation of wikipedia policies.

[[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 14:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

== Merger and Transfer of Info to [[Raffles Institution]] article ==

I know there is controversy with the merger, but facts will be facts. It's our duty to present things in their objective manner. So with the merger becoming official in January 2009, it's time to slowly transfer some of the information there while RJC article will become that similar to [[Hwa Chong Junior College]]. --[[User:Russianroulette2004|Russianroulette2004]] ([[User talk:Russianroulette2004|talk]]) 07:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

:Strong objection to merger ''as per definition''. Transfer of information, yes, but this junior college has (had) a significant enough history to be regarded a separately notable entity prior to the merger. The articles should thus remain separate. And since you appear to be pushing for a transfer, rather than a true merger, the template is unnecessary. '''[[User:Ariedartin|Ariedartin JECJY]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Ariedartin|Talk]]</sup> 11:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

:Agree with objection to merger as per definition. A transfer is something I think we can all agree with. RI(JC) and RI's articles should remain separate, even though they are officially part of the same school, their hierachies, histories, and even policies remain rather different.[[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 17:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== Why I have removed the 'A-level results' section ==

==='A' Level Results===

In the 2007 Revised [[General Certificate of Education|GCE]] [[Advanced Level (UK)|A Level]] Examination, (then) Raffles Junior College's first cohort of Raffles Programme students did exceedingly well with about three in four students scoring distinctions in at least 3 content subjects while about one in two scored distinctions in at least 4 content subjects. In addition, (then) RJC produced 6 top students scoring the maximum of 9 distinctions in the examination. [http://www.rjc.edu.sg/newrjc/admin/document/TopStoryForWebsite5.pdf].

This section was removed for a few reasons.

1. If we are to report on the cohort doing 'exceedingly well', then we will have to have multiple sections each for every time RJC (or RIJC) does 'exceedingly well' - for example my own batch had a record of 13 students scoring maximum distinctions, and the batch before mine had a record of 59.2% distinctions in 4 content subjects. As those are school records but are not put in (if you really need to, I can get a citation for what I've just said), this non-notable snippet of information does not belong either.

2. In actual fact, the 2007 A level examination results are poorer than that of the preceding batches. The batch of 2006 had 52% scoring distinctions in 4 content subjects and the batch of 2005, 59.2%. This is well in excess of the batch of 2007's. Interested people can drop by my user talk page and request citations. I do my research. Why do I state this as an argument? Well, it means that the 2007 results are even more non-notable.

3. The citation given for the statement that the students did 'exceedingly well' is found only from the RJC website itself: self-aggrandizing, similar to McDonald's saying its food is tasty and citing that in a statement "McDonald's released its new tasty Superburger." Also, the citation link is dead and no longer exists. Hurrr hurrr.

4. A similar edit of this sort was removed by me earlier. Refer to two sections above and why I removed them. The reasons are similar to those I am giving now. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raffles_Institution_(Junior_College)#dead_link_.2F_inappropriate_citation]]

[[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 19:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

== Removal of a previously added statement and my reasons (apart from those I gave the last time I removed them) ==

The first batch of Raffles Programme students received their A Level results on 7 Mar 2008. They have done exceedingly well <ref>http://www.rjc.edu.sg/newrjc/admin/document/TopStoryForWebsite2.pdf"RJC CELEBRATES THE OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE OF THE CLASS OF 2007, [[2008]]</ref>. The second batch of Raffles Programme students, the class of 2008, have "raised the bar again", producing RI(JC)'s best results in 28 years <ref>http://www.rjc.edu.sg/new/news1.asp?nid=247"Rafflesians raise the bar again with stellar performances by Class of 2008", [[2009]]</ref>.

1. 'Exceedingly well' as defined by RIJC's own website being the citation - well done! [[WP:SOAP]] Not much explanation needed here; if you are still confused, read two sections up.

2. 'Best in 28 years' - the source quoted does not mention this anywhere. ALSO: I will give some of my own research, taken from RJC's own website! So now you cannot say that I am quoting biased sources - I am using their own sources against them!

[http://www.rjc.edu.sg/new/news1.asp?nid=55 Class of 2005]

"59.2 per cent or 504 students scored 4 A-level distinctions"

[http://www.rjc.edu.sg/new/news1.asp?nid=247 Class of 2008]
4 H2 Distinctions
577      (45%)

[http://www.rjc.edu.sg/new/news1.asp?nid=247 Class of 2007]
4 H2 Distinctions
536   (43%)  

[http://www.rjc.edu.sg/new/news1.asp?nid=88 Class of 2006]

'Thirteen students from the RJC Class of 2006 emerged with top scores at the A-Level 2006 examinations' (equivalent to 13-unit all distinctions)


[http://www.rjc.edu.sg/new/news1.asp?nid=247 Class of 2008]
4. 4 students offered 13 units of study, above the norm of 10 to 12 units prescribed by the Revised ‘A’ level Curriculum. Ming Quan, Yong Jin and Milashini had distinctions in all their subjects. (that means only three had 13-unit distinctions... versus the class of 2006's THIRTEEN...)

Dear me, dear me. 

A drop in the number of top scorers, and a drop in the % 4 As. Maybe they meant that their SPORTS did exceptionally well? ;)

Seems like RJC's sources contradict the proclaimation that the Class of 2008 is the best in 28 years, and that the class of 2007 did 'exceedingly well'. Any other questions? I believe I've provided sufficient evidence against inclusion of that paragraph.

[[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 20:12, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

== Impending name change. Rename article? ==

An impending name change of this to simple Raffles Institution. We may be looking at a forced merger of the two articles, or at the very least a name change of this one. Discussion welcomed. [[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 11:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
i think we can just name it Raffles Institution (Year 5-6), no need to merge both articles :)  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Listentomepeople|Listentomepeople]] ([[User talk:Listentomepeople|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Listentomepeople|contribs]]) 13:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== G20 ==

this line is not factually correct:

"Raffles Institution is Singapore's only member of the [[G20 Schools]] Group, which represents 20 of the most elite high schools in the world."

there are fundamentally two things wrong with this line:

1.) The G20 has more than 20 members, so, "represents 20" is wrong.
2.) The G20 is simply a group of schools sharing knowledge, and though membership criteria may be tough, it is by no means "the most elite schools in the world", many schools from the UK which consistently top the 'a' levels are not even in the list of members.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Langqourth|Langqourth]] ([[User talk:Langqourth|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Langqourth|contribs]]) 09:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Stop with the "best in 28 years" as well as repeatedly adding in each cohort's results ==

Achieving a school record is not notable news. If every year RI(JC) broke its own records, you would have to list its results every year, which turns this article into an archive.

The website used for citation http://www.ri.edu.sg/main/rafflesnewsdetail/?id=167 also makes no claims as to being best in 28 years.

Besides, I have already presented fact in my comment above as to why that claim is patently false, with evidence from RI's own archives.

With that in mind, do please stop uploading every year's results. Unless they broke some sort of national record, they are not noteworthy enough.

[[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 01:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

== Curriculum ==

==Curriculum==

===Raffles Academy===

===Enrichment Programmes===

===Raffles Science Institute===

===Raffles Institute for Experiental Learning===

===Raffles Diploma===

Empty headers moved from the original article, feel free to restore once there is actual content under them. [[User:Overmage|Overmage]] ([[User talk:Overmage|talk]]) 03:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

== Distinguishing Article as "Raffles Junior College" ==

Hi all! The edit as of 9 Jul (GMT) is to distinguish out the Main Subject: Raffles Junior College, from its counterpart [[Raffles Institution]], as what this article is meant for. Since the article [[Raffles Institution]] already covered both the High School and the College sections, letting this article to remain in status quo will only overlap and mislead readers on the whole topic. It is more appropriate to independently present the existence of the former RJC, which functioned as a Government-aided JC with separate administration before 2009, as a piece of history.

Also, to better link up the history of RI, I will be dedicating a section for RJC (to show the history of RI's college section), and insert a link to this full article for RJC.

Will appreciate for any forms of support to help to sort out the history of RI and RJC, and to present their heritage in a more reader-friendly manner. [[User:Lyg 2001|Lyg 2001]] ([[User talk:Lyg 2001|talk]]) 13:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Raffles Junior College (edit)
Template:Broken anchors (view source) (extended confirmed protected)
Template:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Template:Check talk wp (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:Nowrap (view source) (protected)
Template:Old merge (view source) (extended confirmed protected)
Template:Old merge full (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Plainlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist-talk (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reflist-talk/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Side box (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talkspace detect (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Template link (view source) (protected)
Template:Tl (view source) (protected)
Template:Tmbox (view source) (protected)
Template:Void (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:WikiProject Schools (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:WikiProject Singapore (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:WikiProject banner shell (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:^ (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Banner shell (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Banner shell/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Banner shell/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/tmbox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/rfd (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/s (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Side box (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Side box/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Template parameter value (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:WikiProject banner/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Talk:Raffles Junior College.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raffles_Junior_College"