User talk:Voyager

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your categorization work on the pictures of the ski world cup in Megève ! Pleclown (talk) 11:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

[edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Voyager, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Umbenennen meiner Fotos

[edit]

Lieber Voyager ich habe festgestellt, dass Du begonnen hast einige meiner Fotos zumzubennennen (zuletzt "File:2012-04-26 Sense-Sarino (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 301.JPG") in Kirche Gurmels. Dabei entfernst Du insbesondere meinen Namen als Fotografen aus dem Dateinamen (die Namensnennung ist aber im Prinzip ein Teil der Lizenz). Eigentlich ist diese Umbenennung vollkommen unnötig und im vorliegenden Fall sollte dann zumindest eben mein Name als Urheber erhalten bleiben... - Gurmels liegt ja im Einzugsgebiet der Sense (auf Esperanto Sarino) und dass es sich dabei um die Kirche handelt sieht man ja auf dem Gebiet, die Fotos gehören ja zu einer Serie. Gruss DidiWeidmann (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Didi. Ich muss dir widersprechen, und zwar aus mehreren Gründen.

  • Die von dir gewählten Dateinamen entsprechen nicht der Hauptanforderung von Commons:Dateibenennung. Sie sollen nämlich "beschreiben, was auf dem Bild dargestellt wird" (Zitat). Je genauer, desto besser. Insbesondere eine präzise Ortsangabe als Teil des Dateinamens halte ich für unerlässlich. Dass Gurmels zum Saanebezirk gehört, wissen die allerwenigsten - ebenso wenig, was Sarino eigentlich bedeuten soll (ich persönlich denke dabei an einen italienischen Vornamen).
  • Der Dateiname hat rein gar nichts mit dem Urheber, der Lizenz oder mit irgendeiner Auslegung derselben zu tun. Wer wissen will, wer der Urheber ist, kann die entsprechenden Informationen in der Bildbeschreibung nachschauen. Und ausschliesslich dort gehören sie hin.
  • Dass auf deinen Fotos erkennbar sein soll, was dargestellt wird, stimmt leider in den allerwenigsten Fällen. Wie es scheint, sind sie einfach nach Region geordnet und durchnummeriert, was jeweils zu sehr grossen Serien führt. Das mag zwar auf deiner Festplatte sinnvoll sein und ordentlich aussehen, aber Commons-Nutzer können nur selten etwas damit anfangen. Häufig fehlen in der Bildbeschreibung ausreichend genaue Angaben. File:2012-07-18-Regiono Arbergo (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 280.JPG zum Beispiel soll irgendein Gebäude in Kerzers zeigen. Was für ein Gebäude das sein soll, steht dort nicht. Dass jemals ein Ortskundiger die lückenhafte Bildbeschreibung ergänzen wird, ist höchst zweifelhaft. Das Foto ist somit für Commons-Nutzer, die sich in Kerzers nicht auskennen, unbrauchbar.
  • Meine Umbenennungen geschehen nicht aus Willkür, sondern sind mit den Vorgaben in Commons:Dateien verschieben konform. Ich beziehe mich dabei insbesondere auf Regel 2: "Änderung komplett bedeutungsloser oder zweideutiger Namen in sinnvolle, die beschreiben, was auf dem Bild zu sehen ist." (Zitat) Gemäss Punkt 2 der Fussnote trifft dies unter anderem bei folgendem Fall zu: "Die einzige aussagekräftige Information ist der Name des Fotografen oder des Rechteinhabers." (Zitat) Beim Beispiel Kerzers kommt noch Punkt 4 der Fussnote hinzu: "... ist die Ortsangabe so weit gefasst, dass die meisten Nutzer daran ohne Hilfe eines Ortskundigen nicht erkennen könnten, wo das Bild genau gemacht wurde oder was das Bild zeigt." (Zitat)
  • Deine Dateinamen verschwinden nicht, sondern bleiben als Weiterleitung erhalten.

Vielen Dank für dein Verständnis. Gruss --Voyager (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boniswil-blason.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.85 16:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Midland Scottish Rly 1935 Map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Shiranuka Station (Hokkaidō) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


そらみみ (talk) 05:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hypothetical Northwest Territories Blue Ensign.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:KCR System Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boswil StPankratius Fenster1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boswil StPankratius Fenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Voyager,

ich fürchte, bei der Bildbeschreibung hat es einen Fehler gegeben.

Im Jahre 1856 hätten die Herren zu solch feierlichem Anlass wohl eher Zylinder als Strohhut getragen. Stammt das Bild eher aus dem 20. Jahrhudert?

Gruß, Norbert — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.249.166.124 (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich sehe hier nichts von einem "feierlichen Anlass", sondern ganz einfach die im Bahnhof beschäftigten Personen, die sich zu einem Gruppenfoto zusammengefunden haben. --Voyager (talk) 20:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Aarau Stadtkirche Chor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tokachi-Mitsumata station 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

毒島みるく (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lenzburg bahnhof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A00:23C4:D880:1F01:834E:DD65:12F4:FDAA 15:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hypothetical Northwest Territories Blue Ensign.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GPinkerton (talk) 17:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Villigen-blason.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Villigen-blason.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 15:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bremgarten Bruecke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Muvon53 (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villigen-blason.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Athens Olympic Aquatic Centre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Buildings in Interlaken has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rectilinium (talk) 02:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ehemaliges Progymnasium (Bern) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Enhancing999 (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]